SkyDekker

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    21,691

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96

  • Feedback

    0%

  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. SkyDekker
    Wat if the forceful theocracy is democratically elected?
  2. SkyDekker
    Wow, the Irish are muslims? The US is mostly christian. You're right, World Law says you have to be Muslim to be a Dictator, or the World Police will come and arrest you.
  3. SkyDekker
    Really? How big a number?
  4. SkyDekker
    Nice of you to admit you are a bigger whore, worshipping one of the biggest whores. But in stead of all this time wasted on this petty stuff....how about some answers on questions on the subject of the thread. Or, are the two of you really just trolling?
  5. SkyDekker
    You....the american voting public, are what make the system work or not work. Lobbyist are allowed by politicians...which you elect. Media is supported by advertising $$$, nobody watches or reads or listens, no income, that station dies. I know its more fun to blame other's though..... If you (personally) think the system has failed then you (generally) have allowed it to fail.
  6. SkyDekker
    Then you don't have much to worry about. Texas isn't known for being overly politically correct or a strong aversion to nigger.
  7. SkyDekker
    Then you will have to do a better job of electing school trustees and parents will have to parent.
  8. SkyDekker
    Its just you, if it wasn't you would answer the questions on the subject...
  9. SkyDekker
    Right, and what does that have to do with this? The original text remains and I am sure will be published again with nigger in it. As a side note, interestingly enough to this thread the American Version of Huckleberry Finn (yes it was first published in Canada and England) was delayed because of obscenity. Though in that case it was with an illustration. Have you read the zombie version yet? Somebody changed all the "niggar" to Bagger" and published it and made some money that way.
  10. SkyDekker
    Through your elected representative. That's how the system is supposed to work. You seriously thought that was a good point?
  11. SkyDekker
    I doubt you notice much more than your post count.
  12. SkyDekker
    Then don't buy the book. This is non-copyrighted text, anybody can use it, nobody owns it. It's just capitalism at work, also why I don't understand why the right wingers on this site have a problem with this.
  13. SkyDekker
    Not about making me happy, about following up on your word. That's why I asked if you intended to do so. If you don't, that's fine too. Some people don't follow through on their word.
  14. SkyDekker
    That's pretty odd. You said they were good questions, you would think about it and report back. I never mentioned a schedule, just asked two weeks later if you had any intention of responding, to which you answered you did not.
  15. SkyDekker
    You aren't making sense turtle, try again
  16. SkyDekker
    Me.
  17. SkyDekker
    Just trying to have a conversation on the topic. Is that not what this forum is for? If it isn't and it is just to irritate eachother, wouldn't my post still not be entirely on topic?
  18. SkyDekker
    Since you claimed that you would respond publicly, you should respond publicly. If not you are nothing more than a simple liar.
  19. SkyDekker
    Its been two weeks, do you have any intention of responding?
  20. SkyDekker
    It is when you say you don't have an opinion. You can't honestly disagree with some body's POV when you claim not to have a POV on the issue. Makes it pretty clear that you are attacking the poster.
  21. SkyDekker
    Guess we can't expect much else from you either, since you comment on this, yet make absolutely no comment on the subject...... Clearly this is an indication that more people need to be put to death and sooner too. That way no money gets wasted on appeals, further research or anything like that. Just call them guilty and kill them....
  22. SkyDekker
    What an insane leap of logic. Plus, you are forgetting some labels. You want fairness, there is finally fairness. No sexual activity for anybody, gays and straights can discuss their relationships. What exactly isn't fair? And, if you want more fairness you should be lobbying for the restriction on males baring their chests. Why is it that gay men and straight women are allowed to get all excited by men walking around without tops, but straight men and gay women do not get to look at topless women in public? Clearly this too needs to be addressed!!!
  23. SkyDekker
    Funny shit. In the same post you get pissed about the non-equal treatment and then you propose non-equal treatment.
  24. SkyDekker
    Fair enough, so do you agree with his decision or not? Do you think he made the right decision or the wrong decision? Why do you think that it is beneficial to have somebody in power who never changes his mind? What do his OWN standards have to do with this? He has been elected to do what is best for the country. I am sure that often those two concepts are not the same. I would prefer somebody in power who decides base don wat is best for the country, not just stubbornly upholds his OWN standards.
  25. SkyDekker
    What a fine example of the big lie theory.