SkyDekker

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    21,691

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96

  • Feedback

    0%

  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. SkyDekker
    That outcome simply isn't supportable by evidence. If that is hiding, at least I am not hiding behind fallacies.
  2. SkyDekker
    The discussion was about preferences between wealth tax and income tax. The argument was made that wealth tax was unfair, because it would tax assets paid with money that had already been taxed. All I did was point out such a tax already exists. Tax is tax is tax, whether it is federal or state or municipal. The narrowing to only federal tax was a construct made by you and your cohorts after finding the error in your argument. Right. Just like you can make a million a year and not have any assets. If you think about it, that was the crux of kallend's argument. Somebody who loses $60,0000 in a year, but still has a billion dollars in assets is richer than somebody who made $100,000 but has no assets.
  3. SkyDekker
    So far a slew of judges are not agreeing with you. I do wonder though, is the account of the cop listed in the court files not correct? The two 911 calls are lies? You did inform the cop of all 5 firearms and not just of the one in the trunk? You know what...don't answer. I don't care. I am done with this.
  4. SkyDekker
    Look what up? Which democracy will fail in the future? Still refuse to answer my question I see. Which once again has nothing to do with the discussion. Which is why the right to vote is more important that the right to free speech? I am still waiting for answers from you too....going to provide them? Il give you a hint though. The Magna Carta was enacted before the Declaration of Independence.
  5. SkyDekker
    Right, which means the argument that a tax on assets which have been paid with money that has already been taxed is unfair, is disingenuous at best. It already exists.
  6. SkyDekker
    Yup, everybody ever found guilty claims innocence. You lost the case, the appeal and the appeal to the state supreme court. Guess all those judges were all idiots. As far as those thinking I broke some unwritten rules for bringing this into this forum. Winsor said I obviously didn't know who or what he was. True, I didn't. So, I googled his name. I didn't reveal any secret information, or anything that was confidential. It is all part of the public record. Christel going after JR is just insane.
  7. SkyDekker
    What does older have to do with this? You claimed that without guns democracy would eventually fail. Hence, I asked my question above. Can you answer it? Once again you don't actually answer the question. You seem to have a habit of doing this. But, I'll answer yours, hopefully you will return the favour. Pennsylvania.
  8. SkyDekker
    Right, like property tax, which is a tax paid on assets which have been paid with "after-tax" dollars. And there you go making stuff up again. It would be no more of a "Wealth Transfer" than any other form of taxation. My property taxes go towards an ever growing municipal government, which has been mismanaged for years. I find that our Federal Government has been better managed over that same time period.
  9. SkyDekker
    1) Don't know, I am suer when/if it happens it will end up in the courts to establish that. 2) Don't know. That too I am sure will end up in the courts.
  10. SkyDekker
    Yet they exist everywhere. (and if you want to call me an idiot, at least have the balls to do it in the thread you are referencing. Specially if you decide to mischaratarise it) Ohh, you also owe me a bicycle.
  11. SkyDekker
    Yes, lawful users of MJ under State Law. However, the letter is explaining that no such thing exists under Federal Law and goes on to state that uner Federal Law these people are not eligable to own guns.
  12. SkyDekker
    And there you go making stuff up again. There already is a wealth tax. Just because you pay it to a local government doesn't make it any less of a tax.
  13. SkyDekker
    Actually the author states that federal law does not have an exception for medicinal use and therefor any use is unlawful, regardless of any state laws, for the purpose of establishing lawful ownership of guns under federal law.
  14. SkyDekker
    They certainly don't belong to the group of law abiding gun owners.
  15. SkyDekker
    Interesting. Wonder what the risk/reward equation is like for issuing that statement.
  16. SkyDekker
    Now that we have clearly established who and what you are. I am done with you. Go forth and prosper.
  17. SkyDekker
    Just make sure you keep your fingers down when you drive.....
  18. SkyDekker
    Really? There appear to be quite a few countries which do not have a equivalent of the US right to keep and bear arms, yet have democratically elected countries. Do you think they will all eventually fail, but the US will not? Why is it that you aren't upset about the limits put on free speech at voting locations? I think that many people would be in a complete uproar if the same limitations were put on the 2nd amendment at the same locations.
  19. SkyDekker
    And for once the inverse is true as well. Saying it is, does not make it true either.
  20. SkyDekker
    Are you the same Winsor Naugler as the Winsor Naugler III in: State v. Naugler, 2005-Ohio-6274? If so, wow, a liar, criminal and irresponsible gun owner. And then you call other people stupid....
  21. SkyDekker
    Since you are alone, that indeed would make it unanimous. He was administering last rites in the lobby of the north tower as the NYFD Chaplain. Why don't you go and call him a "dumb son of a bitch"? Was he "too stupid to live" as well? Was his death "vastly amusing" to you as well? In that case, go to a local fire hall and make the statements outlined above about Father Mychal Judge. Au contraire, it is fully on display for all to see.
  22. SkyDekker
    Simple, it isn't. It just isn't. Though, if it is in your mind, go fill your boots.
  23. SkyDekker
    Property taxes are pretty common and are a Wealth Tax.
  24. SkyDekker
    Explained above. If you can't see relevance after several explanations, I cannot help you.
  25. SkyDekker
    It isn't. Now care to answer my question? Why is the right to vote more important than the right to free speech? (and more importantly, why do you think all these rights should be the same?)