SkyDekker

You are comparing people who prepare for something that is likely and probable to happen with people who prepare for something that is unlikely and improbably to happen. Then you act all confused as to why those people aren't treated the same. Funny stuff.

I don't understand how you constantly rail against "alarmist" for using biased information, by posting from a heavily biased site. Actually, I do understand it. What I really don't understand is how you don't see how moronic it is.

It is what you support Climate alarmism....... Uhmmm no. But I can see how in a world here everything is "us vs them" you would think that.

Maybe it is really the drugs who cannot handle you?

You alarmist? lol

Scientists....maybe. Climate scientists, not a chance. In some cases they certainly don't support the predictions made. But that doesn't invalidate the science. It actually helps improve it. Regardless of the validity of your claim, 17 years is nothing more than a fraction of a fraction, of a fraction of a blink of an eye.....in fast forward.

Yes, I am sure she is very happy she has had to go through this.

Is that like 20/20 vision for a rifle?

This is why Voter Registration is SO important!!! http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/apr/15/virginia-hacking-voting-machines-security . . . . Ohhh wait....

So that would be a war on those who war on war on wars? I knew a kid named onwar in grade school... Onwar or Anwar? Anwar is a pretty common Muslim name. What turle meant to say was to start Anwar on wars. Like get his opinion...

Tennessee is preparing for sure!! http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2015/04/15/house-makes-bible-official-state-book/25811959/

There aren't enough, if any people like that. Greed is the reason both capitalism and communism don't work without a (metric?) ton of regulation.

Like you? No, no, he did god's work...it is all very different....now where did I leave my government cheque?

Here is the part many of you refuse to see ***Berkowitz notes that Libby did not leak Plame's identity in retaliation for her husband opposing administration claims that Saddam Hussein had sought to purchase uranium from African sources. Plame's name was leaked by Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage to columnist Robert Novak. "From the moment he (Fitzgerald) took over the FBI leak investigation in December 2003, he knew Mr. Armitage was the leaker but declined to prosecute him…because the disclosure of Ms. Plame's identity wasn't a crime and didn't compromise national security," Berkowitz writes. "Mr. Fitzgerald, who had the classified file of Ms. Plame's service, withheld her State Department cover from Ms. Miller and from Mr. Libby's lawyers, who had requested Ms. Plame's employment history. Despite his constitutional and ethical obligation to provide exculpatory evidence, Mr. Fitzgerald encouraged Ms. Miller to misinterpret her ambiguous notes as showing that Mr. Libby brought up Ms. Plame." http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Judith-Miller-Scooter-Libby-trail-false-testimony/2015/04/07/id/636958/ Funny how you take the word of a reporter over the ruling of the justice system when it suits you. Other times they are all all scum under the influence of the democrat controled lamestream media.

Marc, I am but a simple man and am not a scientist. When an overwhelming number of actual climate scientists are convinced that man has influenced climate, I see no reason not to believe that. To me it is similar to the overwhleming number of doctors stating that smoking as bad for you. I believe them, even if there are a few doctors who claim different....and there are some lifetime smokers who die of old age.

Very simple I do not believe that the worlds climate changes becaue of man Simple enough for you? the other bs you keep bringing up just depends on the context of the coversation at the time pars it if you want but hopefully the line above is simple enough for even you Exactly 8 days ago you posted that there has been no warming for over 20 years. 8 Days later you now seem to believe there is warming, but it isn't because of man. No that isn't simple enough for me, cause it simply doesn't make any sense. Dude, you are all over the place, whats up with that?

Water http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/31v96m/

The guy who shot the video is in the media saying that there was a struggle on the ground before his recording started. Not sure how that changes anything, specially considering it will be hard to explain how this guy was going to be a threat running away without a weapon.

Thanks Jerry and Andy, Always good to learn something!

What about felony murder charges for the officer who was present when the taser was planted? That's what a civilian would get charged with. Unless that state doesn't have felony murder?

Is there a point here somewhere? Is this a grand victory for the oil industry?

I'm wondering - If the cop honestly believed that the guy took his taser, would he've been legally justified shooting the suspect? The video showed something falling on the ground - presumably the taser? Perhaps the cop thought the guy had possession of the taser and then shot him - but when he couldn't find it by the body, he was like "oh, shit" and then searched for it and planted it near the suspect? Maybe that will be his defence. My understanding is that a cop is justified shooting somebody in the back if they have reason to believe the individual poses a significant threat of death or serious injury to the officer or others. IMHO that would be hard to argue even if the guy actually had taken the taser and is running away.

Yes I am sure they will be very thankful.

But this guy should have been aware he was dealing with a cop who was going to shoot him in the back and then plant the tazer beside his dead body? By the way, shouldn't the second officer be charged with felony murder? That's what they do with civilians. Lastly, the whole issue is that cops have shifted the assumption of risk for their job. It used to be that cops assumed the risks of their jobs. They took responsibility for their actions. Now, they feel that the public should assume the risk for their job. We have seen it in actions and we have seen it in the justifications for those actions after the fact. Lastly, when a cop plants "evidence" that easily and calmly, he certainly creates a perception that it wasn't the first time he had done so.

Running towards you = running away = semantics Taser over here + taser right beside the body = semantics CPR + no CPR = semantics