SkyDekker

Members
  • Content

    21,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96
  • Feedback

    0%
  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. 1) Because the emotions Trump is tapping into and rhetoric he is using has lead to millions of deaths in history. 2) because toddlers with guns have killed more Americans than terrorists.
  2. http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/john-gizzi-orrin-hatch-obama-will-nominate/2016/03/13/id/718871/ Wonder how Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) is going to backtrack from this one.
  3. Because I believe there are safeguards in the system. For the same reason I don't believe that what candidates claim they can actually deliver. I am assuming you can see a difference between thinking somebody would be willing to do something and stating somebody will be doing something? If not, then I can thoroughly understand why few things make sense to you.
  4. Then your reasoning for not watching main stream media doesn't make any sense. But you also don't like liberals. And your reasoning for staying away from main stream media is that they are biased. How do you determine between biased news sources which one you should avoid and which one should be used to help form an opinion?
  5. But you stay away from the main stream media because you think they are biased. Shouldn't you stay away from Breitbart for the same reason? Or do you believe Breitbart isn't biased?
  6. Breitbart's own employees have left because it has turned into a Trump superpac. Yet, you feel this is a news source worth quoting and basing an opinion on? Interesting.
  7. Not at all. And I do believe Trump is using tactics very similar to Hitler and tapping into very similar emotions. However that is not the same as: "You wholeheartedly agreed that Trump is the beginning of a new Era" I said that in my opion more than a few proud gun owners would be more than happy to use their arsenal to help round up Mexicans and muslims. Again, that isn't the same as saying that: "proud gun owners will start rounding up Muslims and Mexicans" You are using all kinds of logical fallacies to try and manufacture something. Yes. And how that says more about the people than the candidate. The red herring comes into play when you make up some position for me and then suggest the comment reflects on me.
  8. The main stream media outlets don't post here on dz.com. Right, like the Trump mouthpiece Breitbart, which you have previously held in high journalistc regard.
  9. main stream media CNN ABC CBS NBC FOX I watch none of them anymore So I have no idea what reports you refer too How do you go from stating: "That is what the lame stream media wants you to think so" to: "main stream media CNN ABC CBS NBC FOX I watch none of them anymore " If you don't watch them, then how do you know what they want their audience to think?
  10. Either a straw man or your reading comprehension is a little off. Red herring.
  11. That doesn't reflect badly on the candidate, it reflects badly on the people believing the candidate. Like you? Sure, whatever makes you feel better!
  12. That doesn't reflect badly on the candidate, it reflects badly on the people believing the candidate.
  13. This. Good thing we have all those guns. . . So did Iraq. Plus I have a feeling more than a few proud gun owners would be more than happy to use their arsenal to help round up muslims and Mexicans.
  14. Couple more options, but none are very pretty: a) racist b) ignorant of Trump's racism c) indifferent to Trump's racism but like something else about him (god knows what) which is ignorant d) don't think Trump is racist Crazy which is ignorant
  15. That is what Bush said yes. That was the lie part. ***but we do know that once things quieted down, he was going to ramp up his program No, we don't know that. Are you mind reading again? no, that was not a lie Read the article in the link I posted it years ago when it came out and you ignored is then too they had stock piles of yellow cake Then intended to buy more both are facts Sigh... Well they do say Trump supporters skew to the low educated side.
  16. That is what Bush said yes. That was the lie part. No, we don't know that. Are you mind reading again?
  17. No it doesn't. The article claims, that somebody else claims that in the Wikileaks documents there is reference to yellowcake being removed from Iraq. That still doesn't answer the Yellowcake from Niger allegation. It just obfuscates with lots of claims of hearsay and third hand info.
  18. But was there Yellowcake from Niger? Pretty simple question really. Why are you dodging it? Did you not read the link??? It rambles on, but never claims that there was Yellowcake from Niger. (Never mind the website, won't even go into that) So, was there Yellowcake from Niger?
  19. But was there Yellowcake from Niger? Pretty simple question really. Why are you dodging it?
  20. probably some......but not all you can't have a conversation if you label everyone that does not agree with you as an ignorant racist True, though those who support Trump have to be either a racist or ignorant. If they don't believe his racist comments, they have to be pretty ignorant to support a guy who is very openly making racist comments.
  21. Moveon.org George Soros Now the following is from Snopes NOTE: Snopes posts that the claim Soros is funding the protestors is UNPROVEN but, in the article they have the following What a fine example of Rush once again not understanding what he reads.
  22. Yes, we know that. Even Trump knows it. See Jerry He keeps repeating the same lie He cant help himself Even Trump walked that one back Warrantless wiretaps - even GWB walked that lie back. WMDs - "We found the weapons of mass destruction.", GWB May 2003. GWB himself admitted later (2006) that there weren't any. Yellowcake from Niger - there wasn't any. Just another lie. See You just cant help yourself anymore You really need to find someplace different to give you your opinions So there was Yellowcake from Niger?
  23. Correct. Just like all Nazis weren't in favour of exterminating Jews.