SkyDekker
-
Content
21,691 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
96 -
Feedback
0% -
Country
Canada
Everything posted by SkyDekker
-
I don't think at all it sucked the air out of their argument at all. Nor do I think the Justice Department would have ever pursued this to the end. The ability to threaten long legal battles is much more important to the government. The reason for the lawsuit wasn't to get a decision, it was to show other companies they can and will fight them. They will even fight a monster company, of course until conveniently somebody else comes around. The government was never going to risk their ability to "bully" over this case. AT least not in my opinion.
-
Do I deride any sites worse than you do those I link to? I could try and explain it further but (I heard this one the other day) But explaining it to you would be like trying to explain fire to a fish. You deride Huffington post for not doing exactly what you just posted they did. You made your own argument invalid. If you want to invalidate my arguments with Whattsup or Breitbart, please do wait until I post a link to their sites showing that they are doing what I say they are not.
-
What is it that I am not getting?
-
Best part is that almost 45 thousand people signed a petition to have the government force a property owner to do something against his will, because it is against their rights. I guess that many people truly are that stupid.
-
The true irony is those like you not being able to condemn the source In any event I will still not prefer Trump But even he is better than Hillary Why would I condemn the source of an opinion piece? People are allowed to have their opinions, whether I agree with them or not. The irony is you holding up Breitbart as this big bastion of wonderful journalism, while deriding biased media such like Huffington.....and then you post this.
-
-
I think it was very important for the government that this case never made it through the judicial system. If the ruling had gone against the government, it would have lost the ability to "bully" smaller companies without the cash flow to fight them. And it it had for for the govt, it would have set a precedent. I've read articles arguing this was the real goal. If that was the real goal, it doesn't make sense they would have found a way to get out of the litigation.
-
I think it was very important for the government that this case never made it through the judicial system. If the ruling had gone against the government, it would have lost the ability to "bully" smaller companies without the cash flow to fight them.
-
LMAO
-
That is way too reasonable, please remove yourself from SC immediately.
-
It wasn't a grab and dash, and some locals had time to be ready when he tried to get away. The perp was dispatched by service 7.5mm rifles, not concealed carry sidearms. Since it was in 1992, it may be inaccessible via the interwebz. At the very least, it got a lot of attention in the Kanton at the time. I have been going to that country every year since the mid 70s and have multiple family members living there. I am still calling bullshit.
-
I think it should be allowed. Don't understand why the pro-gun rights party would not ensure that people can carry while attending their convention.
-
Well said.
-
People will always have silly thoughts. Like when those founding fathers figured that allowing everybody to walk around with guns would make for a peaceful society
-
Fully agree. Just noting that Ron uses the term thug to indicate something a bit more specific.
-
Yes you do, just not muslim ones. Thugs is his word for black people. Not exclusively, however that appears to be the regular scenario in ATL. Right, and you know a retired guy, who has it on good standing that he knows a guy with a friend who is black and not a thug.
-
SCOTUS Unanimous in Support of Stun-Gun Rights
SkyDekker replied to ryoder's topic in Speakers Corner
Well, it's official. A stun gun is a gun, so if they ban all other firearms, it does not violate your second amendment rights. Not sure I fully understand what you are trying to say here. Are you suggesting SCOTUS unanimously decided so that when guns are banned stun-guns are banned as well? -
Usually black on black violence, at least that seems to be the situation in ATL. A friend of mine, retired LEO, said we should just think of it like a self cleaning oven. Thugs just fight and kill each other. I don't like them. On the upside, Channel 2 and 5 News are guaranteed stories for 6 o'clock. One day we will hear of your Essie Mae.
-
Yes you do, just not muslim ones. Thugs is his word for black people.
-
That's the job I want!! Off with their heads. An Axe is waaaaayyyyyy cheaper than cancer drugs.... Trigger finger amputations are cheaper than trauma care too
-
But one Trump protester is definitely all Lieberals!! They are bought and paid for by Moveon.org And only groups of liberals act that stupidly QED
-
But one Trump protester is definitely all Lieberals!!
-
Don't forget the death panels.
-
Were the perps refugees? "Refugee" has a very specific meaning. Maybe they were just illegal immigrants. You know, like here in the U.S. Ours are just sleeping now. Probably just lived in the Belgian mountains with like minded people.... I love how y'all bash on Ron while defending the terrorists to do so. Who is defending terrorists? I simply see very little difference between Ron's mindset and that of extreme Muslims. Neither are acceptable in my opinion.
-
That's funny Little creative liberty...Belgium is pretty flat.