SkyDekker

I did not see any battery in the video. How about you? I saw him doing in the video exactly what he said he wasn't doing.

Was there a multi-million dollar inquiry that took 700 days to complete so far, even though 7 previous investigations turned up nothing, with a report released right before the election 8 years ago? Which report was this?

Nah, this whole thing just shows what low-life assholes these pseudo patriots are. This isn't about dead Americans, or doing what is right. This isn't about holding people accountable or making sure a wrong is righted. This whole exercise has been started and timed with only one thing in mind: an election campaign. It shows the lowest of the low, cockroaches should get more respect than these people.

Kind of like you having already convicted Hillary. She have convicted herself more than once...... Is that spelling or grammar?

Don't think you got it. The level of scumbag has nothing to do with the party they belong to. If doing something makes you a scumbag, then you are a scumbag. When you try and make that action illegal for political gain, all while doing the same scumbaggy thing and worse....that makes one a bigger scumbag in my eyes. Regardless of party affiliation.

As a matter of fact, I have. Republicans are better, though, because they espouse "law and order", "personal responsibility" and "family values" so loudly that when their hypocrisy is exposed it makes it so much more interesting. So does that mean we should expect democrats to be scumbags because they don't espouse "law and order", "personal responsibility" and "family values" ? Not really. Let's look at the Bill Clinton case. Bill was a dirtbag cheating on his wife getting fucked and sucked all over the place and then lied about it when questioned. The Republicans went after him with full force fully condemning what he did, impeaching him and trying to criminalize his behaviour. While the Republicans were trying to regulate other people's lives like that, the people most active in trying to accomplish this and going after Bill Clinton were: Getting fucked and sucked all over the place and were lying about it. Liked little boys. Even though they are all dirtbags, I see some significant differences.

Completely different issues, which is probably why standard programs aren't working.

Can I vote that you all just leave? You most certainly can. We understand that we do not have allies. We have to protect ourselves, if it comes to that. Our blessed hope is in Jesus Christ. We anticipate the rapture before God's wrath. But, we do not know God's exact timetable. Guess Allah is beating Jesus.

Bullshit.

How so? I don't see them as prone to violence. Well, they used to get beat up quite frequently by fine Christians. If they hadn't been gay, those fine upstanding Christians wouldn't have had to beat some sense into them. Clearly gays have been a source of quite a few violent actions.

You kept saying your "feelings" were the truth. Now you are saying they are feelings. In response to this you will call it something else. Anything to get a reaction and keep some attention on yourself. There is a word for that, trolling.

It's not, it's dehumanizing all people. Kind of my point. They did this back then, now they don't do that specifically, they've extended it to everyone. We're just trading cards. Except we have, granted limited, control over the role we play in the deck. Black people at the time had no control over that at all and also had absolutely no representation. I don't see it as being equivalent to what is happening now.

Yet rush will continue to do so... Yet funny enough I don't see that as being the same as dehumanizing black people.

No, that's not it either. The reality is that the slaves were not considered fully human, and therefore not really people. It was simply a way for the northern and southern states to divide up power in a way they could both agree on. No one gave any consideration at all to the worth of slaves as people. you are as wrong as the rest of them The reasons are in the google link I posted You prefer not to learn The fact they are being bartered with as a political ploy indicates they aren't seen as equivalent to a white person.

Yes, he is trolling and knows that abortion will get a big reaction.

Don't you? You think we're all condoning and encouraging murderers. Are you OK with that? If you are. Yes. I'm not necessarily trying to change you, or your thinking. The question was asked how I considered the situation. Then I answered, and BOOM - but hey - glad y'all can keep your emotions out of it. Lol priceless shit in SC. An established troll in SC makes a statement indicating all abortion is murder and those who have had abortions are murderers. And then complains that people react with emotion.... Some priceless shit. I am actually trying the veal right now, but won't be here all week.

Sure it is. They would have to work harder and put less effort into partying and give up time - That is the biggest convenience excuse there is. It's the easy way out, thus more convenient. There is a lot of assumptions happening there.

This is so easy, that it is embarrassing. I'd challenge anyone to attempt to endure some of Obama's father's preaching or Obama's preacher's preaching and believe Obama to be sane. Yes, it's embarrassing how badly you botched that. Obama wasn't raised by his father, therefore the sanity or otherwise of his teachings (which are insane how, by the way? I really don't know what they are.) are irrelevant to how Obama turned out. Except for his communist mother and mentor, Frank Davis. I equate communist leanings with romantic attraction to barnyard animals. If you have the demonstrated capacity for either, it is immaterial whether or not you claim to have gotten over it. Meh, communism and capitalism are no different. They are both effective ways to ensure power and wealth is contained within a small group.

Actually I think the first step is on you to indicate the research and subsequent results in that table are valid. Just because people answer a questionnaire doesn't make the answer valid.

How many?

Why the obsession? We get it. You love abortions. Enough already. Why do you hate liars unless the tell lies you agree with? No one is obsessed like anti-choicers and others who feel the need to control women are. Opinion, not fact. You got it This is a long way from over but, they will use this to destroy this person and then scare the hell out of anyone else who may try something that is a holy alter to the left I predict, in the end, this person will win and get retribution But it will take years and have a great cost. Of course you were the first here to post about how these videos were absolute proof that all kinds of illegal things were happening. When you finally figured out that you were wrong again, as usual, you went very quiet on the thread.

the north did not want the slaves counted because it gave the south more power by the number The north did not want to count them at all so, in an attempt to get the south to come along the north offered the 3/5s of a person count The south accepted this because they believed that the south would grow the fastest and then therefore have the power they needed to keep more of their reps in office to maintain slavery. But this did not happen The north grew faster and then were able to get more reps in congress and that is when the votes started to end slavery and history was made Wendy It is not about agreeing with anyone It is about knowing history the left has distorted this story so as to make it look like the Dems ended slavery. Which is NOT the case So, if I am wrong, WHY would the south want to count every entire slave? If what I posted is not correct, what would that gain the south? If you don't know, pick your own site to learn about it https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#safe=active&q=the+reason+for+the+3%2F5s+slave+count So slaves weren't equal to white people, who automatically got counted as 1. They were barter chips in a grander scheme, of lower quality, ability and worth.

The bait? What the fuck are you talking about? You think somebody took a case all the way to the Supreme Court in such a way that they could bait an opponent with the decision by the SC? Are you on drugs? kallend ran with the liberal twist on the ruling Are you on drugs? wow! Bait means something was specifically put somewhere to get a reaction. Are you saying Breitbart baited people?

The bait? What the fuck are you talking about? You think somebody took a case all the way to the Supreme Court in such a way that they could bait an opponent with the decision by the SC? Are you on drugs?

Looks like FBI/DOJ should maybe look at their own issues first: https://motherboard.vice.com/read/fbi-flash-alert-hacking-group-has-had-access-to-us-govt-files-for-years?utm_source=mbtwitter