SkyDekker

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    21,691

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96

  • Feedback

    0%

  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. SkyDekker
    Vote tampering is part of this to some degree. If you convince the public that your democracy can be controlled and that your press is always lying to you, it becomes much easier to force the country in a different direction. This play book is as old as time.
  2. SkyDekker
    Wow, I am sure those idiots at CIA and FBI never thought of that.... So is your point then...Nobody knows who did it? Uhm no. I would think that the CIA and FBI were smart enough to think of this type of false flag and wouldn't simply disregard their opinions based on this scenario. Would be great to see the actual evidence, though I doubt that for a lay person like myself it would shine much light.
  3. SkyDekker
    Wow, I am sure those idiots at CIA and FBI never thought of that....
  4. SkyDekker
    If it is a false flag operation, James Clapper would have to be in on it. What would be in it for James Clapper? Doesn't make much sense.
  5. SkyDekker
    Not sure how Americans could be surprised that Trump is going to use the Federal budget to greatly enhance his family's wealth.
  6. SkyDekker
    Jesus Christ, people actually believe this shit?
  7. SkyDekker
    Could you imagine the ranting Rush would e doing on here if HC had won and she had given a cabinet position to somebody who gave $6 million to her campaign? He would have been calling for investigations. He would have been calling for jail time. Lock her up, lock her up. Now....crickets.
  8. SkyDekker
    Yeah whatever. If I had know he was going to send that tweet I could have easily made a million dollars without leveraging myself. With some leverage I could have made enough to retire....off one tweet. And if you think none of his cabinet picks are donors then you are just wilfully ignorant. I mean, just a little bit of reading would tell you otherwise. You may want to keep in mind that Breitbart not reporting it doesn't mean it isn't happening.
  9. SkyDekker
    Animals love him! Wait till you see what Dodo has to say about him.
  10. SkyDekker
    How would you know? You have already told us that you believe all media lies to you. How do you establish when their motives are true and when they are not? You seem to very arbitrarily decide when to believe the media and when to call them liars.
  11. SkyDekker
    Climate deniers and generals. Of course you would think that is outstanding. A National Security Advisor who believes in conspiracy theories. Nothing but the best.
  12. SkyDekker
    Yeah so none of them are even close. Not a great surprise. I didn't think you would know the difference between somebody saying "we know", and "I don't understand how anyone".
  13. SkyDekker
    And Trump's brown shirt twitter army was quick to threaten his kids, his family and him. The New America.
  14. SkyDekker
    Goes right along with that old adage about the beauty of democracy: One acre, one vote. LMAO
  15. SkyDekker
    NO. The more you read, the more you are filled with false information.
  16. SkyDekker
    Easy solution, end the program Save billions and nobody will be on foodstamps anymore. People are only using them cause they are too lazy to find a job. Americans are getting lazier and lazier. Get a job. If it wasn't so easy to get welfare, people would go to work. Nobody wants to fight for the American Dream anymore. Capitalism says: find another job. If the company cannot find employees at the current wage levels they will have to increase their offerings. Are you some kind of socialist?
  17. SkyDekker
    The New America. No wonder you believe the Media is lying to you. That whole sentence makes absolutely no sense. We know that facts are indeed not very welcome with you. Well, one thing you say is true. So far a stopped clock is beating you though.
  18. SkyDekker
    Exactly!!!! Next thing you know the media will be telling you there is no Pizzagate. Could you imagine?
  19. SkyDekker
    Seriously, you need an explanation? It is for the same reason Trump's 1991 Boeing 757 is worth multitudes of a run of the mill 1991 Boeing 757. And the $4 billion number is just grabbed out of thin air. But clearly you don't need an explanation for that. That shit we take as gospel!
  20. SkyDekker
    People in general ARE assuming he's stupid. The thing is, we also know he's a con-man. I don't think it's a stretch to consider Trump has recognized the power making a tweet and the effect it can have on the market. To say the least, the potential is YUGE. Your side assuming he's stupid is what got you into this mess. That's not true. Assuming he was stupid didn't get anybody in any mess. Assuming there wouldn't be that many stupid people to vote for him is what did it. Turns out there really are THAT many stupid people.
  21. SkyDekker
    Parroting bullshit does not make it true. http://www.snopes.com/trump-won-3084-of-3141-counties-clinton-won-57/ Using this map, I counted ~40 blue counties just in CA, WA, and OR: http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/results/president Please it was on Facebook and it agrees with my viewpoint. Why would I give a shit about your facts. Facts don't matter anymore. Texas does this shit right: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-abortion-booklet-debunked-cancer-link-suicide-risk-claim/ Facts....nah, just tell them what you want them to hear. Repeat often enough and people will believe you. People really are that stupid.
  22. SkyDekker
    Interesting. Can you link to serious scientists who have stated this? Well there's Fred, and he's pretty serious. Siegel & Howell's work "Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer," ISBN 0-07-057316-6 covers the fundamentals pretty well. Mind you, it might be good to be at least at the Master's level in an appropriate discipline to tackle it, but YMMV. BSBD, Winsor A Master's level in a related discipline is required to read that they state it is a foregone conclusion that CO2 is the single determining factor in climate science? Seems odd that a high level of education is required for a foregone conclusion.
  23. SkyDekker
    Interesting. Can you link to serious scientists who have stated this?
  24. SkyDekker
    Technically that is undecided at this point, but one can safely assume Trump. The country doesn't vote. The presidency was won by Trump in an election that saw him secure a majority of Electoral College votes. However, he did lose the popular vote by a significant margin, with more people voting for Clinton than for Trump.
  25. SkyDekker
    This is a pretty stupid thing being argued about. Trump has won the election (assuming the EC votes that way in the upcoming vote. I have no reason to believe that won't be the case) More Americans voted for Clinton. Trump won the EC votes required, but lost the popular election. None of that is really up for debate is it?