SkyDekker

And don't forget, is also funding all right wing violent protests as a false flag operation.

Yup, all being organized out of the basement of a pizza restaurant.

Thinking you are superior because you are white is not an exchange of ideas Marc. No, I am sure the majority do not and are disappointed by it. I know I am. Sometimes, sometimes not. The world isn't binary.

This has been speculation for quite awhile. It may hurt them quite a bit to accept the pardon. I know you know this, but accepting the pardon is an admission of guilt and can be used in civil court.

Oh a climate study from a biologist and a chemist funded by the B Macfie Family Foundation. Dr. G Bryant Macfie is a medical doctor and a known climate sceptic.

Was also very nice of Trump to pay some respect to the missing US sailors. He may have been too busy referencing himself almost 250 times in the speech.

Same reason I throw a ball for my dog.

Just because one thing happened doesn't mean that something unrelated happened. You are creating an argument nobody has made and are arguing against that. Why are you doing this? Well, because you clearly were wrong as usual. Nobody is arguing that what people through 50 or 100 years ago as a Democrat or a Republican is relevant today. Only you are making that argument, because you heard on some idiotic radio program or (much more unlikely read) on a website that back then they were called Democrats. So that is all you have been doing since then is spewing: Democrats, Democrats, Democrats. When people tried to explain that those people switched to the republican party in those days you kept mumbling Democrat, Democrat, Democrat and asked for peer reviewed studies backing up that assertion. (Never mind that anybody with half a brain could have looked it up) You were presented with that. Ever since then you have gone back to what you always do, mumble something unintelligent and make up something nobody is arguing.

Also from my link it talks about Southern Social Conservative Democrats switched parties and joined Northern Civil Rights Republicans. You asked for printed history that the dixiecrats became republicans. Then you supply a link yourself that clearly shows this to be true. Your response: the link also says something unrelated.

I am asking you for your opinion on something. Are you saying your opinion is too simplified to state? FYI, from your link:

Yes it is pretty clear. Why did the Dixiecrats break from the Democratic Party? Held their own convention, supported the Republican Presidential candidate etc. Why do you think that happened?

Why, would be rather useless for you wouldn't it? There is more than enough evidence to suggest that the Dixiecrat movement broke the traditional allegiance to Democrats and helped start the rise of the Republican Party in the south. Your inability to find written support for this just bolsters my first statement.

Some more: Of course Obama was able to get 60 Democrats and 2 independents to vote for a healthcare bill.

Come on, this is rush we are talking about. Guaranteed he didn't make it past the first paragraph and that is stretching it.

Here is some more honesty:

Here is a quote from your very fact oriented president last night:

I know English is difficult for you, but those words meant that you are a liar as well since you have shown not to care to wait for facts before making a judgement.

Actually. I didn't state whether I thought it was a fact or not. You made that judgement all without watching any of it. Yes 4.9 false claims a day since inauguration is all because Hillary lost. Makes perfect sense. Just like you

Gee, I wonder You are making this too easy So you have made up your mind without actually looking at any facts, such as the speech the comment was based on. Aren't you the one who always says you don't make any judgements until you know all the facts, like simply watching the speech. Sounds like you are a liar then, no better than Hillary Clinton.

Then how would you know what was normiss posted isn't true? How would you know that Trump didn't come across as unhinged last night? It would appear that you are the one going by speaking notes from your favourite websites as opposed to going by actually watching something.

You must have watched the CNN Twilight version. .....again.... Does CNN change the words during a live broadcast? That's quite a feat. Was Trump's speech different on Fox?

I give credit to BLM for bringing awareness to the issues of police brutality, excessive force and the killing of unarmed suspects, but the sole focus on perceived racism does nothing to address the real problem. The fact is that there has been a significant increase in unarmed shooting deaths by police in the last few years, regardless of race. Why? What are we going to do about it? Let's say that we deal with the fraction of instances that may actually be racist. Ok, great, then what? The problem of increased unarmed shootings still exists. What are we going to do about it? The recurring theme seems to be that black people want to be treated just like white people. Well guess what, shit happens to white people too - especially poor white people living in the inner city, because that's just where shit's mores likely to happen. We keep comparing blacks to whites, but you have to understand that the majority of whites are dispersed throughout the entire country, many of which live in less populated areas with fewer police. The majority of blacks live densely populated in areas where there are more police - do the math. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. Do you really think things would be any different if a million unemployed gun-toting rednecks were crammed together with thousands of cops? The solution to the problem is to address our violent culture and start allowing blacks to disperse throughout the entire country just like the white folks - True integration. We are still a severely segregated country, and that's wherein lies the racism. . . Your insight and understanding of this problem is too adept for the SC. Black males with some exceptions have extreme difficulty to elevate themselves above the victim mentality. When I worked with the court ordered drug offenders the blacks always blamed their plight on some aspect of the white society. Blacks who supervised these programs would mentally dominate the clients and try to get them to "man up." The black women that I worked with were generally Christian, understood the problem and tried to reason with the males. Sometimes both approaches seemed to work. Blacks tend to group together and IMO, they tend to pull themselves down instead of pulling themselves up. It is a cultural phenomena. The only thing I can do is love and respect them individually. I have a beautiful bottle of wine reserved for the day I don't see this bullshit posted by you anymore.

Probably not base my decision on a 1972 picture of women in skirts. If part of this story is true.... https://finance.yahoo.com/news/h-r-mcmaster-reportedly-gave-051814902.html

Apparently you are only able to know the real history when there is a statue. Most of us are able to read so can use other resources, like books and written text.

I thought it was interesting that both Pakistan and India were indicated as high risk areas where terrorists could travel from. Of course neither country is on the travel ban list.