SkyDekker

Is that the same imagination that dreams up an all Republican Deep State fighting against a Republican? Or the text messages that are just going to destroy the Democrats? Or, the Memo that is just going to destroy the Democrats? Or the 2.5 year investigation that will put Hillary in jail? Imagination like that?

From the story YOU linked to: Your lack of adequate reading before posting and drawing incorrect conclusions is on a par with the your usual posts. His staff emails show that not to be true. He's just trying to cover his ass now Cover his ass? If that is what you think then you must have a major problem with Trump Jr and cohorts meeting with Russians in Trump tower and then have Trump Sr. who supposedly knew nothing about the meeting, draft the response lying about it... But if that isn't a big deal in your world, then why is a prank call now worthy of CYA?

Looks like the GOP is claiming things not really based on facts again: https://democrats-oversight.house.gov/news/press-releases/justice-department-contradicts-republican-claims-on-uranium-one

It isn't new. That criminal referral to the FBI has been around for a while. Just because Hannity calls it memo 2.0 doesn't make it true. Actually that is a pretty good indication it is false.

Hey did you read that part where they reported it to appropriate law enforcement? Trump Jr. did that too right? That's why Bannon basically called him an idiot right?

Jesus got her back and started fucking a prostitute though.

That's the dude who rant he 2.5 political witch hunt right? The one where you didn't complain about the length of the investigation or any political bias in the investigation. That one right?

Considering the first FISA warrant was issued in 2013 that is clearly false. Unless time travel is now part of your conspiracy theory?

Just like the Taliban. And in Pakistan. And ISIL. Yeah, that's good company to be in. This is completely different though. This is Jesus and not Mohammed. Completely different.

Yes, but only in a footnote. Nobody could be expected to read a footnote. Those things aren't really important are they? Can't expect a judge to read any of that stuff.

Good question. And how is it that an independent Senator can run for a major party nomination? You would think some term of party membership would be a requirement. I heard in an NPR news story that the GOP wasn't acknowledging him as a Republican candidate, wouldn't give him any money, and the local chapter was trying to get his name off the GOP primary ballot. Yes they tries through legal proceedings and failed. Which baffles me and hence why I asked the question.

I have a feeling that inflation is probably a concept a bit too difficult for the majority of your news sources.

In Canada people can be expelled form a political party. Why is that not an option in the US?

Its not that hard to connect the dots. Start at 1:20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtqIiYRm0XI I gotta ask because I don't know you but is that joke? I don't know you either. Was it Saturday Night Live? Then, it wasn't a joke. Ok, this was the same source a friend of mine used trying to make a point and I traced the reporter and it turned out he was a 22-year-old Russian writer of RT. The guy in the one you posted looks he's shooting from the basement of his frat-house and had to scramble to wipe the sharpie marks off his face before they rolled video. Edit: And by the way, not being on SNL isn't a very good metric for proving truth or falsehood. Considering the troubles Trump supporters have with facts, I am happy to see that one at leasts understand that SNL isn't a great source for facts.

Considering what is happening to your markets today, that statement is very correct. Just not how you intended it.

Yeah, back to how it used to be. Of course you knew it was gender neutral before right?

Its not that hard to connect the dots. Start at 1:20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtqIiYRm0XI Takes a special kind of stupid to believe the Uranium One "scandal" too.

And that the guy who investigated Clinton also investigated Trump. That shows that clearly their political bias corrupted the FBI's ability to do their job.

That's right. School shootings are an unfortunate side effect of the wonderful freedoms American offers. Like any culture, blood offerings are simply a requirement. Now, seeing a nipple will scar a young boy for life. One cannot imagine the untold horrors and scarring this boy will have. While I cheer with my boy seeing the opponent getting his head bashed in and creating the next murderer through CET, I cannot cope with having him see a nipple.

Lastly, the author can't get some basic legal issues correct, so not sure why we should have any faith in any of the more difficult concepts this memo is supposed to broach.

Stated in the memo is confirmed. A fisa warrant would not have a bit issued if not for the Steele dossier. The fisa judge was lied to or he would have never issued it. I truly believe there's much much more to come on this. But all your spin on this so sure as hell fun to watch Then why would Trey Gowdy, who actually is one of two people who read the FISA warrant not support your assertion? Nunes never read the underlying material. I think because the unmasking debacle cost him his clearance.

So basically this memo says: 1. Carter Page is/was likely a Russian spy and has been under investigation since 2013. 2. Papadopoulus screwed up enough to trigger his own counterintelligence investigation in 2016. We already know that Flynn was a foreign agent. That Trump guy only hires the best people. Maybe he meant the best people foreign governments have to offer?

Right before trump decided against implementing the sanctions, approved by a veto proof vote in Congress, the three Russian spy chiefs were in the US. One of whom is supposedly barred from entering the US. I am sure that is all one grand coincidence too. The State Department referred any questions to their management, also known as the Russian Embassy. That's right American reporters asking questions of the American State Department were referred to Russia.

I am sure Hook will send flowers to thank them for their selfless contribution towards his right to have lots of guns.

This doesn't make any sense. If it is already known, then there really is no need for investigation anymore. My understanding is that special counsel can be appointed by AG or DAG. The second option is through Congress, which was the case with Starr. You'll have to point me to the law that states that SC appointed by DAG can only happen when a known crime has taken place. My understanding is that appointment through AG or DAG is not reviewable. I have a feeling you are just parrotting some right wing website or talkshow and have done absolutely no research yourself. But feel free to prove me wrong. No, we don't know that. We also don't know if it is true at this point. We know that two separate people have come up with similar allegations. Both are however uncorroborated at this point. At least as far as we know. Funny you should say that, because it certainly seems that is exactly what you are doing. So you know the dossier is a lie and the memo is the truth. All without investigation and in the case of the memo, never even having seen it. But you feel comfortable accusing others of spewing talking points. You really should try a little bit of independent thought and not automatically see everything "your side" does as true and factual and everything the "other side" does as lies, deception and bullshit.