SkyDekker

Members
  • Content

    21,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96
  • Feedback

    0%
  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. That's not weird spin, that is what the report says. It is pretty logical to assume that if there was absolutely no evidence of obstruction, the report would have clearly stated the President did not commit obstruction of justice.
  2. I guess I would expect some integrity to not welcome help from an enemy nation to get myself elected.
  3. Right. So there is definite evidence that there was obstruction, but deemed not enough to get a conviction. How do you see that as completely clearing someone? Never mind some one in the highest office possible.
  4. Also from the report: "The presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump ("Trump Campaign" or "Campaign") showed interest in WikiLeaks's releases of documents and welcomed their otential to damage candidate Clinton". In other words, the current president of the United States welcomed the interference of an foreign nation, a foreign nation generally seen as an enemy to the US, to help him win the election.
  5. from the report: "If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment"
  6. With the exculpatory factor being the people involved were too stupid to understand they were committing crimes. https://twitter.com/ashleyfeinberg/status/1118903244774883328/photo/1
  7. And Brent also left out the beginning of the statement he was responding to, since it was regarding reputable scientists making this prediction. I doubt he thinks AOC is a reputable scientist, but he had to eliminate wording to fit his narrative. Pretty much standard fare for any climate change denier.
  8. Yes "these people". If you don't understand the difference between referring to people as "these people" due to a characteristic they have no control over and referring to "these people" for a characteristic they have full control over, you are one of those people.
  9. Must have missed something. Didn't see trump release his tax returns and Democrats claim they are fake.
  10. These people simply don't live in any version of reality. Only feelings of fear, revenge and anger matter.
  11. Ahh the turtle special. Change some words and claim it is all the same. Your understanding of English is either extremely poor, or you are trolling.
  12. Ah, so you don't understand the difference and you think that the difference between temperature and weather is just semantics. Sounds like you are making my argument for me.
  13. Bill's comment was about "temperature". You changed that to "weather". Not a failure to communicate at all. More either a failure to understand the difference, or another attempt at trolling.
  14. Somebody clearly forgot to rake the Notre Dame.
  15. Now when you figure out the other term for hashtag it gets even funnier....
  16. And yet you weren't able to understand it.
  17. That wasn't the hypothesis. The change in wording also shows you have a severe lack of understanding of even the simple terms and concepts used. Makes it highly unlikely you have any understanding of the more difficult concepts.
  18. A very regular US-based dropzone.com poster and fellow skydiver committed suicide and not a single dropzone.com Republican stood up for spending billions to provide proper healthcare to their fellow countrymen and women. I feel for the suffering of your friend's family, however the heartstring post feels a bit hollow. Crime by illegal immigrants is much less of a concern than crime by American Citizens. Under Obama illegal immigration was at an all-time low. Under Trump's policy that has turned into a clusterfuck.
  19. Don't know I didn't claim it. I had assumed you were smart enough to read and understand two different names.
  20. And that should be completed to find out if anything happened and how it could be avoided in the future.
  21. Why would the investigation stop because she retired?
  22. Only one real way to find out. Release the report.
  23. No genuflecting at an altar. Just trust the consensus of scientists more than I trust your cherry-picking of comments from non-scientists.
  24. Wasn't your post before this about how snark wasn't required? I don't think anybody here thinks the Green New Deal will fix that. At least not in the sense you mean. The Green New Deal does appear to have restarted a conversation. It has brought conservatives to the table with a counter proposal. Having these discussions and finding a way forward could at least partially "fix things".
  25. Yeah....that quote doesn't say that will happen in 2000. The year refers to the reversal part, not the disaster part. Pretty basic English grammar.