SkyDekker
-
Content
21,691 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
96 -
Feedback
0% -
Country
Canada
Everything posted by SkyDekker
-
There IS a problem with global warming... it stopped in 1998
SkyDekker replied to rushmc's topic in Speakers Corner
I predict you won't post an acknowledgement of how incredibly wrong you were. -
You realize the article calls it a delusion political belief right? The "rational" part is imagining an evil agent to deal with your own fear.
-
Those were the same candidates who had an opposite stated position when the public voted for them? When the vote took place, the position of these politicians was that they should not confirm a SC candidate in the run up to an election. How do you gather that those same politicians, now changing their minds are fulfilling what they were elected to do? When comparing popular vote with composition of the SC, you quickly start to see that what has happened and what is happening is not supported by the population, but rather a designed outcome.
-
So no direct evidence. Just your feels. Isn't that what you are objecting to above? That Trump is getting blamed without evidence, but just based on how people feel about him?
-
British Columbia provincial election in October 202
SkyDekker replied to riggerrob's topic in Speakers Corner
Agreed. This will be my first BC provincial election since moving here, so some homework will be required.... -
Nothing in that article says that Obama himself knew or was told or approved any of the changes or anything like that. Remember up above you want evidence of Trump himself being involved. Not his campaign, not his administration, not people around him. Trump personally. So, this is a big bone of contention for you with Obama, so live up to your own requests. Show where Obama himself is responsible and prove he himself knew it to be false. Not his administration, not his campaign, he himself. You know the same expectation you have of Trump.....
-
British Columbia provincial election in October 202
SkyDekker replied to riggerrob's topic in Speakers Corner
Though it would appear the BC Liberals are more aligned with Federal Conservatives than with Federal Liberals. -
Clearly your understanding of this subject is the same as your understanding of your constitution. One sided and extremely limited.
-
Good of you to prove my point. Other than “I get to have guns” you have absolutely no clue about your own constitution. If you truly care about the 1st Amendment you may want to get more upset about your President calling a journalist getting shot “a beautiful sight”.
-
People can make all kinds of accusations. That still doesn’t determine if an actual rape took place.
-
We were talking about rape. We weren’t talking about rape accusations. Even without accusations a rape takes place. The idea you and Coreece seem to have that somebody can decide if they were raped after the fact is pretty offensive.
-
Did he know it was false? Did anything change with the bill after he said it? How do you know he knew at that time? Who told him? What specifically was he told?
-
How the hell is this a 1st amendment issue? Other than “we get to have guns” you guys really don’t understand your own constitution very much. Like the female GOP politician making statements about how the constitution doesn't get rewritten.....she wouldn’t even get to vote if it didn’t. The stupid is strong.
-
Because a Trump nominee being the deciding vote on a Trump presidency wouldn’t bring about any issues.... my guess on timeline is confirmation hearings before the election and vote after hearing. Many GOP senators will be caught between short term and long term considerations.
-
That wouldn’t be rape. Concept really isn’t that hard.
-
Doesn’t answer the question. What exact decision did he make. Same question you are asking above.
-
Ron has used the "I have a black friend" commentary for quite some time. He seems to think it somehow makes people forget the endless supply of racist commentary and statements made by him.
-
After decades and decades of subsidies they now not need them, yet continue to get them in various forms. You somehow think that is a straight comparison to the renewable energy industry. And then you somehow conflate that with subsidies given to Tesla...... Never mind that you stated that currently the fossil fuel industry net net net does not get subsidies. You still haven't explained that one, even though you keep saying how simple that is going to be......
-
Which the fossil fuel industry is getting in much greater numbers and has been getting for decades. Haven't you figured out yet this part of your argument is stupid? Never mind that tax policy has been used for centuries to shape and guide society, weird to only use it here as reasoning the industry is not viable.
-
That’s pretty much the entire marine corpse. Imagine if an incident took out the entire marine corpse, their would be no doubt the US would have a unified response.
-
You are the one that indicated subsidies are a sign of nonviability. Then you argued "net net net" the fossil industry isn't subsidized. You have been completely unable to support these assertions. You asked for specific examples of subsidies so you could easily show that "net net net" they are not subsidies. You have been running around in circles ever since then.
-
What is fucked up is you thinking the crime of rape is based on the victim's decision.
-
That's pretty fucked up.
-
We have been through this before. I will take it you are not a man of your word. Can't say I am overly surprised.
-
Looks like they actually start with steakhouse gift cards.
