DaVinci

What is it about you guys and liking folks that commit perjury? Clinton lied under oath. Point is, IF YOU CLAIM TO HAVE ANY FAITH IN POLITICIANS... MAYBE YOU SHOULD VILIFY CLINTON FOR LYING UNDER OATH!!!! Or, you could say that while you might disagree with Clinton on that one issue, that you still think he was a good President..... Just like people can disagree with Reagan on that issue and still think he was a good President. But that MAY not fit into your black and white views. But still.... then you of all people should hate Clinton for lying under oath.... you almost being a real lawyer and all that.

It WAS.... But just this year my insurance has started to get bills. The majority of the paperwork people I have seen are vets. But that does not change the rules. The *people* have been pretty good (a few exceptions) but the PROCESS is what is messed up. I have to go to the VA 2-3 times a year (according to them). But if I want to go see a Dr, I have three choices personally: 1. Call up my buddy and say: Hey, I have "X", need "Y". Costs me lunch and I get to hang out with a friend. 2. Call up my Primary care doc off my insurance. I get an appointment that day or the next and he spends time actually knowing my issue. Costs me 20 bucks. 3. Call the VA. I'll get an appointment within a week (3 days seems the norm). My appointment is not personal and the Dr spends no time with me. I pay nothing, but my insurance gets charged. Several times my personal private Doc(s) have asked me why I was on the regimen I was on.... When I told him VA he told me that it was a stupid plan that did nothing. Checking with my buddy Doc, the private guy was right, the VA was totally off. This has happened more than once.

Yes, if you READ those exchanges, you see you throwing insults more than anyone else. The only irony here, is you bitching about people who throw insults. But, let the readers decide. The example of this thread is perfect... Your first post to the thread: My first post to the thread: Now class.... 1. Which is inflammatory? 2. Which uses name calling?

Point to mnealtx.

I already own several items that the police can ask for registration to prove I can own them. I currently have to provide an DL if asked (in most States). And the AZ law allows a DL to be used. Also, the AZ law only mirrors the Federal Laws.

Or nothing will happen since you are wearing running apparel. Now, try running in jeans and a jacket with a ski mask and the result might be different.

Tier I over 50%. Or they don't know you have private insurance, or you didn't make enough that year to be required to pay anything. Your opinion... mine is my private HC is faster, better, and less BS than the VA.

And I had a cop friend tell me that when criminals suspect a house has a gun in it, that they leave that house alone. And that gun owning citizens are less likely to be hurt during a home invasion. So, does my anecdotal evidence equal yours?

translation: I can't back up my ranting, yet you have been able to back up your positions and have been able to prove mine as false. translation: I am tired of being made to look silly by being proving incorrect when I make statements, and I am unable to defeat your positions with logic, so I will just stop playing.

And would you also agree that there is a lot of data that shows a lawful gun owner protecting themselves with a weapon?

None... .the thought would never cross my mind.

1. The watch removes the ability to really be concealed. 2. What happens in the middle of the night when I don't normally wear a watch? 3. It adds a complex technical solution to a simple problem. 4. It is not considered safe enough for the police, so it should not be mandated for civilians.

Then you can't single hand, or offhand shoot the weapon. I would have the same argument against airbags that only work with a certain butt print.

Got it.... You are unable to discuss a topic and must result to lame insults.

Not 100% correct. I have a service connected disability and the VA is charging my private insurance for "co pays". Now if I didn't have HC, they would not charge me. But they are charging my insurance company and that is taken into consideration when I buy insurance.

The law in most States (TX for one) require that you identify yourself to a cop if they ask for ID. That is even if they just walk up to you because you are present. And the AZ law does not allow a cop to just pull up and ask for ID... It has to be during a "lawful stop, detention or arrest made by a law enforcement official".

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=foo+bird+joke

Still waiting on you to provide your proof on your claims of phony quotes. You know... Like I did when you claimed Jesus, Gandhi, and Mandela did not approve of guns.

The proof is in your posts.

Got it... you are NOT a lawyer. Big whoop.... You think you are the only one?

This from you is hilarious: And a perfect example of your double standard on the Constitution is here: Yet you rally around the 1st and the 4th. Hello double standard!!!!

Just read your own posts over just the last week and most would see the examples.

You say the same about the Dred Scott case? Was that legal and fair as well?

That is a dangerous opinion.... IMO

Made sense to a lot of people...... Based on an old joke. But good job actually avoiding the topic and playing the poster!!!! I thought was a banning offense BTW?