DaVinci

As long as a persons use does not hurt others, I don't care. Tax it. Do not allow people to sue over the damage done to their lungs. It would reduce the jail population and increase tax revenue.

So you think it being an emotional position makes bigotry OK? Do you see me supporting them? No. See you seem to support bigotry as long as YOU are being the bigot, but cry about it when anyone else it one. And you are willing to do the EXACT same when you feel like it. You are acting like a bigot while crying about others acting like bigots..... You don't see the irony there huh?

Got it you can't find facts so you go personal. He claimed that the "Father and Son appointed justices" handed Jr the office. The FACTS are that only one Justice was appointed by a Bush (Thomas) and that the Justices ruled pretty much like most SC decisions.... Divided down "party" lines. And the chances that the two Obama appointees will support 2nd Amendment rights is also NIL.... Your point? You can take the overly simplistic "The Justices gave back". OR, you can look at the more complex situation that Justices normally decide based on their leanings and how they interpret the Constitution. But to claim the Justices threw the election to Bush is just a lame Bumper Sticker BS slogan. And a serious case of not understanding the SC and a serious case of head in the sand pure political BS.

You should read this like 10 times and then read your first post to this thread again.

I have plenty of weapons C&R, Title II...ect. But part of Capitalism is price v. worth. I will not pay more for something that is worth less just because. Added Supply will reduce prices. Now, other than the "I already have mine" response... Do you have a rational explanation on the opposition to allowing the import of these weapons?

Yes, but when a guy in charge of keeping it clean is the very guy not following the rules.... It is funny.

Does the VP appoint Justices? If not, then only one was appointed by a Bush and that was Sr. So, "a Court packed with father & son appointees" would be incorrect... Unless: 1. The VP appoints to the SC (they don't). 2. One is considered "packing" (it isn't). And you out of all of us should know a SC ruling is often down party lines.

I never said that. I just showed that the Obama administration is preventing the import of these guns. And the Obama administrations position on firearm ownership is not exactly a secret. Do you have a relevant point here?

Hell, I'd like one. I tried to get one before, but the Civilian Marksmanship Program does not have many in stock. "SINCE OCTOBER 2008, WE HAVE BEEN OVERWHELMED WITH ORDERS FOR ALL PRODUCTS, ESPECIALLY RIFLES AND AMMUNITION. AS A RESULT, IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO PREDICT DELIVERIES FOR ANY OF THE ITEMS THAT CMP SELLS." And many of the popular items are sold out or only available in a bidding war.

Remember when personal attacks were not allowed? Like it or not MOD... The STATE department knows about this issue. "A State Department spokesman said the administration's decision was based on concerns that the guns could fall into the wrong hands. "The transfer of such a large number of weapons -- 87,310 M1 Garands and 770,160 M1 Carbines -- could potentially be exploited by individuals seeking firearms for illicit purposes," the spokesman told FoxNews.com." And in other news: Asked why the M1s pose a threat, the State Department spokesman referred questions to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. ATF representatives said they would look into the question Monday afternoon, but on Wednesday they referred questions to the Justice Department. DOJ spokesman Dean Boyd referred questions back to the State Department." So the State Department, BATF&E, and the Justice Department all kn ow about them. AND "The White House referred questions on the issue to the Pentagon, which referred questions to the U.S. Embassy in South Korea, which deferred back to the State Department." So.... The State Department, BATF&E, the Justice Department, the White House, the Pentagon, and the US Embassy in S Korea all know about it. Lets see.... White House.... Obama State Department... Hillary Rodham Clinton Appointed by Obama Justice Department... Eric Holder, (legal advisor to Senator Barack Obama during Obama's presidential campaign and one of three members of Obama's vice-presidential selection committee.) Pentagon... Controlled by the Sec of Def, Robert Gates. Who was appointed by Bush, but Obama kept him. US Embassy in S Korea... Not much that ties her to Obama, but Obama did pick her as part of the Presidential Delegation to the Republic of Korea to Attend the Seoul Liberation Commemoration Ceremonies. So to claim that Obama did not know.... Yeah sure. And you have said before that the man at the Top of the Administration is responsible for the actions of his administration.

Yes, you calling someone out for misspelling a name IE "RePUBICans" You doing that *IS* irony

So you are claiming YOUR bigotry is OK???? That you THINK is obviously motivated on hate..... You are pointing out bigotry and hate.... But not in the way you intended.

Yawn.... so 2000. And STILL totally made up. 1. "Court packed with father & son appointees" Your math is not very good: Ginsberg selected by Clinton. Scalia by Reagan. Kennedy by Reagan Breyer by Clinton Sotomayor by Obama Kagan by Obama That leaves 3, 1 by HW, 2 by W Bush. 2. "which in fact "elected" the son" Your history is not very good..... "W" could not have appointed any until AFTER he was elected. Typical... and totally wrong.

This is bigotry: "Is it true that not all right wingers are racists, but all racists are right wingers" I once got jumped for being white in the wrong part of town... How was that not racist? And I very much doubt they were right wingers.

I'd really like to see you answer this one

Yet you will start a fight and insult people. That is funny. "You should probably have an understanding of something before spouting off about it" And what about not playing the player? "Oh gee, Larry the Cable Guy chimes in."

Yeah, the nerve!!!!! Hard to imagine!!! http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/003481.html Oh Crap!!! Your guy did it too!!!

Does not matter. Totally different society, totally different beliefs, totally different situation. But comparing a single variable on the same group IS a valid test.

Well if guns cause crime... Then spoons do make people fat.

Then you seem to support the idea of Americans shooting illegal mexicans on site if you don't have a problem with Mexicans shooting Americans.

The economy and unemployment numbers not to mention the polls do not support your rant.

Then your whole race issue is gone based on your own information. The "data" you have presented *might* (and I mean might) be used to claim a financial difference in the justice system.... But if Whites or "others" get treated the same, then it is NOT race based.

Weak even with your standards. Saying what you need is not insubordination. Notice which is in quotes and which is not.... You are not doing well here. Biden != the President. You have now struck out. You claim to have been in the Military, but it is pretty clear you have no idea what you are talking about here.

That does not fit with you normal ranting. So you are OK with the rich not paying taxes as long as they are tricky????? Yet you are for higher capital gains taxes..... One does not fit with the other.

Sure how about every thread you blame the 2001 recession on Bush? You mean the one where you jumped on folks for not calling it a recession before the NEBR did and then compare those to the ones where you jumped on folks for calling it a recession before the NEBR did? You have a double standard and use the NEBR to defend BOTH positions.... That is pretty slick.