jakee
-
Content
25,001 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74 -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by jakee
-
That's exactly the kind of intellectual honesty we've all come to expect from the new Right.
-
Well that's obvious bullshit. That's definitely a lie. And that's for sure something you just made up. And um, the misheard lyric you were after was 'cavalcade'. Now 'scuse me while I kiss this guy.
-
As if on cue. Right - you believed Trump was the one man with a solution but really he’s just crazy. When the rest of us all knew that in advance I’m not quite sure why you’re bragging about being so clueless.
-
Winsor’s defining political characteristic has always been that he’s a massive racist and sexist but doesn’t want to admit it. Everything else he says is just cover for voting for the guy who will bring back white make privilege.
-
Lol, yes. As long as you have the razor sharp insight of Rich to sustain you, what need have you of other drivel?
-
So everything you’ve said so far about voting for the economy was a lie. Ok fine. Pretty obvious given you voted for the guy with THE WORST track record for decades. Then were just left with you hating anything that makes the country any less racist. Quelle surprise.
-
I saw a Russian exile explaining why Putin still goes through the play acting of holding elections. If you’re a pure dictator, the resistance can coalesce around the hope of democracy. If you hold elections that everyone knows are rigged, you teach the people that democracy can’t save them. This is why the Republicans have never shut up about election security for the past ten years. A big part of it is appeasing the giant orange man-baby’s ego, but a bigger part of it is conditioning enough people to believe that there is no real democracy. Then when they’re finally in a position to really, truly, blatantly steal an election enough people will collectively shrug and say ‘well that’s what they were already doing anyway’.
-
Pretty much guaranteed at this point this is all leading to a huge ICE and military deployment to police polling stations in ‘problem’ districts at the midterms.
-
So you don't care that your chosen one panders to racist, sexists and discriminators, and you don't care that he's trying to force DEI programmes on every university and government department in the country. So why did you bring it up? You think that's news? Everyone already knows you're incapable of dialling down your virulent level of racism and sexism.
-
In looking glass land, yeah. Meanwhile here on earth, you’re just lying.
-
Yes indeed. It’s just ironic that Winsor so desperately wants to come across as an intellectual yet has the least interest in actually understanding anything of any regular contributor to this forum. Like his take on German politics is as if he walked into an upmarket neo-Nazi meeting (you know like the ones Peter Thiel goes too) and blindly believed the first thing someone told him about how Hitler came to power. Even Rich Ravizza is more capable of saying something original and unexpected than Winsor the MAGA parrot.
-
It is indeed INSANE to suggest that any sport in which being a 6’10” man is an advantage has been made to implement quotas for 4’10” women because of woke. Why do you believe insane things? And yet, as with the deficit he is exploding, Trump is responsible for the biggest rollout of forced DEI programs in the history of the US government. Except he wants to force universities to hire quotas of white republicans, which you’re obviously fine with. It’s only the DEI which means you might have to interact with more black people that’s a problem. I fail to see how Musk funnelling hundreds of billions of dollars of government contracts into his own companies despite offering significantly less efficient solutions than the competition is going to solve the deficit. It’s amazing how willing you are to swallow anything your heroes tell you without applying an ounce of critical thinking.
-
Well yes, that is indeed what you're betting on by voting for Trump - the hope that maybe this time will be different from last time. But why?
-
Again, with the benefit of hindsight, having seen what happened, you still believe there is a level of economic distress that would justify electing Hitler in response. And you think this is a fine argument to make in public and does a good job explaining your thought process. It's genuinely fascinating. To be fair old Adolf was a dab hand at that too, so it scans.
-
So obviously, you decided to vote for the guy who made it much, much worse last time he was in office. Again it’s remarkable how easy it is for people to manipulate you with an oversimplified sound bite or two. Like a sugar rush for the brain. I don’t know why you choose to outsource your critical thinking to the partisan outlets that feed you your talking points but it’s pretty weird. Seems like you would have the ability to learn things about how history, society and politics really work if you could only be bothered to look.
-
You say, as always, without providing a shred of reason why. It always amazes me how people like you are happy to move through a world you have never made the slightest effort to understand.
-
You might consider what it says about you, that hearing you contend that Hitler was the best available candidate to lead Germany in the 1930s is not in the least bit surprising. The fact that you think you can defend your choice to vote for Trump by comparing yourself to the Germans who voted for Hitler though… well you really should start to wonder if you’re as clever as you think you are.
-
And yet again (again again again), you’ve never once stated a single thing that is a factor. But hey, we know you love posting exceptionally racist stuff, so it’s a fair bet that misogyny isn’t far behind. Of course despite your protestations you might just really love Trump - which would make sense given he’s a racist misogynist.
-
Of course - Putin is everything Trump wants to be in life. He's richer, more powerful, better at embezzling and wrote the book on transforming a democracy(ish) into a one-man authoritarian state. Trump meeting Putin is like a teenage girl meeting Taylor Swift.
-
Can we all just take a moment to appreciate the hilarity of any professional journalist or trader believing that Trump’s social media feed provides ‘certainty’?
-
As Kallend points out, Trump has already demonstrated that he won't police DC. He pardoned the entirety of the last set of thugs who used violence to carve out a place to "protest," or in other words beat up cops, invade the government and steal free elections. So.. where are you going with that?
-
Videos of crime stats? How does that work, exactly?
-
I think you're confused about what you were just cheering on. It's literally the opposite of allowing the city to police itself. I wonder what you think about his directive to the capitol police to beat up anyone that disrespects them, in contrast to his mass pardoning earlier this year of anyone who physically attacked capitol police officers? You must be outraged by at least one of those things - which is it? The DOJ even hired as a consultant one man who exlicitly called for capitol police to be murdered while participating in a riot. Would it now be resonable to assume Trump wants the police to raid the DOJ so that they can find and beat up that guy in retribution?
-
How does it feel to enthusiastically support the death of constitutional seperation of powers in your country? Presumably you had very different principles once before falling into the orbit of the orange god-man, I wonder if you can remember what they were.
-
From companies that knew he would weaponise the federal regulators against their business plans, yes. But still, he remains an adjudicated rapist. Lol what? Watching you create an argument you think sounds convincing by referencing a bunch of random schools of philosophy is like watching the David Attenborough clip of Orang-Utans trying to hammer nails into a plank. They've seen other people do it and they recognise the overall appearance of the process but really they have absolutely no idea what's actually going on. Well there was a paragraph that started with Q, followed by a paragraph that started with A. To put it another way, it was a Q&A with Grok. Are you sure you can't break that cryptic cypher without one of your Youtube talking heads telling you what to think about it?
