jakee
-
Content
24,925 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74 -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by jakee
-
You know damn well which party has made it a central strategy and which has spent decades researching and implementing electoral methods by which they can undermine the actual will of the electorate. To even suggest that there is an equivalence between the two right now is beneath you.
-
It's really no wonder why DZ.com has become more stagnant over time.
jakee replied to Cocowheats's topic in Speakers Corner
And if conservatives dominated the environment they wouldn't bother reading any post to find out what it was actually about, they would just fire off a boiler plate response to every thread about everything everywhere being the liberals' fault even when the topic has nothing whatsoever to do with political discussion. I think that would get pretty stagnant, don't you? -
It's really no wonder why DZ.com has become more stagnant over time.
jakee replied to Cocowheats's topic in Speakers Corner
I'm not sure how you read it that way. -
It's really no wonder why DZ.com has become more stagnant over time.
jakee replied to Cocowheats's topic in Speakers Corner
Someone correct me if I’m wrong but I’m pretty sure that the way hard, non-bendy objects absorb impact energy is by breaking. When they don’t they just transfer it all to the next component in line. -
You not thinking is one of the great constants of this forum.
-
Oh cool. I'm sure that solved everything.
-
Funny thing is I’d bet all those old executives would swear they were hiring the best men for the job and the most suitable women for the typing pool. Well sure, if you believe what a bunch of old conservative white men have to say about it. But I think that’s rather the point.
-
I just gotta wonder why you keep going to their gigs.
-
So? People can legally change to what you called their fantasy gender and have it on their current legal documents. So ultimately they can get the courts to refer to them by whatever name and gender they want. And given the amount of emphasis you just put on the legality of the process, I'm going to have to assume you're totally fine with that. Lol, really? Only a very informal setting? So if you're in meeting at work you would insist on calling your boss Jonathan even if you knew he hated it and preferred Jon?
-
That's exactly the point. For some people 'their choir' is the dominant ruling class of society.
-
Probably because that is an extremely creative description of what happened. Why are you so anti cop?
-
And that's a slanderous statement about Rittenhouse? I don't think he'll win a payout with that, if I'm honest.
-
You either didn't read or comprehend the list I posted. Many more than one person a year has been killed 'accidentally' by people they live with, and it's still happening. Unless you have some kind of psychic power that lets you know exactly which ones were deliberate then it's pure wishful fantasy to think that it has stopped. And I'm sure that means it won't happen again.
-
What slanderous statements? Just because he's legally innocent doesn't stop people from being able to think and say he's a violent racist who should have been convicted of murder. OJ Simpson doesn't get to sue people who say he killed Nicole Brown.
-
That is fucking disgusting.
-
What? You think you had one accidental shooting each year? You think they stopped? https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=south+carolina+accidental+shooting&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
-
Thank you for proving they weren’t asking about anyone’s opinion of progressive policies. It is much appreciated.
-
With the answer given because it continously gets pushed down conservative routes despite voting progressive. It was nice of you to bring this to our attention.
-
Even now most attempts at passing progressive policies are being blocked in the Senate and drastically anti-progressive rulings are being made in the Supreme Court, whose makeup is the opposite of what the American people have consistently wanted for well over a decade. Again, it's highly unlikely to the point of absurdity that your hypothesis is correct.
-
Given that the majority of voting Americans have voted for the party of progressive politics at every national election since '08 but have been saddled with conservatives in control of some or all of the government for that whole time, it seems extremely unlikely that your hypothesis is correct.
-
For what, against a context of what?
-
Every turn? The civil war succeeded in getting rid of widespread slavery, that was a pretty important win for SJWs. People can march in pride parades without being stoned (with stones, not drugs) these days, so that's cool. Schools aren't segregated any more, which seems important. On the other hand I'd be interested in hearing the non hand wavy problems you have with SJWs and the woke that makes you dedicate so much time to opposing them. Mostly you tend to start pretending it's the same as Stalinism just so you can find something to rant about, which seems to me to be a fairly hefty redefinition.
-
You said the point of posting the video was to show that woke isn't popular enough to survive in the marketplace of ideas. It's right there in black and white, but whatever I can't be bothered to press the point. Because regardless of waht you said, I'm sure you'll agree that the proliferation of gay comicbook characters highlighted in the video you posted is a clear demonstration that woke ideology is indeed flourishing in the marketplace of ideas.
-
And what does that have to do with work in general and the market place of ideas? Remember that the video you said showed woke couldn’t compete in the market place of ideas came from a group of Christian homophobes who are angry that SO MANY independent for profit companies are now making their cartoon characters gay. How exactly did that make sense to you? Saying one thing and proving another seems to be a habit you just can’t break.
-
Lol, you’re too sensitive to cope with seeing fictional gay people in public but you think I should lighten up? By the way, your evidence that it can’t compete in the marketplace of ideas is one angry note from one angry subway customer. It’s not very compelling. On the other hand your homophobic Christian video is very good evidence that it can.
