JoeWeber

Corporal Corpulent reporting for duty, Sir! Ready to shoot my ear off, Sir! Right away, Sir! Thank you, Sir! Anything you say, Sir! And may I say, sir, it's a pleasure serving with you, Sir!

Continue editing. Only 44 words left to delete.

Both have not yet floated away from the surface of Planet Earth, too.

Were they hugging each other and whimpering in the manner of sissified "Democrat, professor neighbors" everywhere? Good idea with the shroud. You wouldn't want the muzzle flash scaring the miserable bastard away whilst you were uselessly pumping .22 caliber bullets into his ass.

The lectures are awesome. I needed to read the book, "The Character of Physical Law", a couple of times to get close. My favorite Feynman book is "Surely you're joking, Mr. Feynman". They're all great, really.

Turtle, you need to post less and think more. Guns don't equal Computers.

Brent to the imaginary rescue! Did you kill it? Were you wearing Camo and SF Ski Goggles? Was everyone impressed with the barrel vents on your Go Gettum Cowboy Mark 32 pretend assault weapon? Have you ever even shot a bear?

As ever, you miss the point entirely. No one gives a fuck what an Old Airborne Ranger is comfortable handling. Get real man, your new tools of the trade are pull up cords and flip flops. You need those ridiculous guns like you need a stick in your ear. And, because you apparently don't get the news, your inanimate pieces of composite(s) and steel, in the hands of whackos, aren't benign.

Just look at these clowns all dressed up in their Space Force War Suits. Glocks on their thighs, Afrika Corp Googles on or at the ready. These assholes are just loving their war play fantasy. Tell me Brent, do you imagine yourself in this crowd of idiots tickling your trigger guard and believing it's you and only you between anarchy and peace in America?

What the fuck use are those prized possessions? Do you really think you are cool for having that collection of short dick toy's? Enjoy your bang bang fantasy life, Brent.

Just the position of the minute hand on the clock. Now just wait a little more.

Scalia's tortured logic to arrive at Heller which effectively turns any two hobo's leaning against the same lamppost into militia members with the right to own any weapon available now or a million years from now is not mainstream. Nor is a single Supreme Court decision the sum total of American Jurisprudence. Don't make such arguments. That AEON guy may think you're a simpleton but I know you aren't, not by a long shot. For you Heller is as the pleasing aroma of roses. Enjoy it while is persists. To me it's just a nasty fart at 6 Grand that will go away as soon as someone opens the door.

The Epstein/Einstein Conundrum.

Yep. And in attendance whilst Biden will be campaigning in Iowa will be Warren and Sanders. I'm thinking Pelosi has made her preference clear.

So true. And who could argue that the several great Oceanic Garbage Gyres that are filled with all manner of plastic throw aways aren't made even funnier by plastic straws. Fine. You have finally owned the truth: your position is in alignment with the current interpretation of the second amendment. That means, obviously, that you agree the second amendment is open to interpretation. You fucked up, Doc. Another piercing insight into your world view. That's not only a puerile deflection it's how you think. The great thing about internet forums is that it is all in writing. If you can just keep someone defending their positions they'll eventually step in it.

That is weather, not climate. That is self validating silliness. And I know you can't help yourself.

You are anywhere but in the middle, Brent. All of the below is based on your writings on these pages. Your position on climate change is at the extreme end the spectrum. You are cool with it because you believe it will all work out for the better, now and in the future. You can not prove any of that, you dismiss world wide negative effects as counter balanced by certain transitory and mostly local positive effects. And wrap that in a belief that increased atmospheric CO2 is the birthright of developing nations that they too may gas themselves to economic prosperity. That no one, in particular you, has the slightest clue how to correct things if you are as wrong as the overwhelming majority of world scientists believe you are tell me that you are simply indoctrinated. Your Second Amendment beliefs are also extreme. You believe that Scalia's reconstructed version in DC v. Heller confirms your constitutional right to own flame thrower's, hand grenades or even the vaporizing Ray Guns of the future. That isn't just apparent nonsense to anyone not hypnotized but it is also extreme. You make the lame assertion that Gay sex is a simple choice they make and you support the appointment of judges who will discriminate against your "gay friends" thereby reversing a decade of human rights progress in this country. Along side of that is the degradation of women's rights, too. Is that what you want or is it simply acceptable collateral damage if environmental regulations are eroded, the fossil fuel industry is less burdened by social concerns and poor people get a larger shaft? Take the ones you like but all of those positions are extreme and extremely unflattering. And you do have a default support of Trump and have written so here. Why? Well, I do believe you have written it is for the above wonderful benefits received, and no nose holding required. As I said, you aren't special. There are lot's of you's. My curiosity, and my question to you, is why do those positions, so often the positions of the conservative religious, so often end up in the same basket?

Weaker than usual, but that's cool. I'm curious, what is the connective tissue that joins AGW climate change denial, extreme second amendment beliefs, homophobia and default support of Trump? The thing is you are not unusual or special at all. Yes, here you get to be special but you aren't, really. Out in the real world there are boat loads of you's all believing the same basket of stuff. Why?

One mans Epstein.....

You liked it. Remember?

Well, no shit.

Have you ever put yourself in harms way for another who you did not know? Very few of us have but it's that hard decision that the scenario masks. These scenario games miss the mark and tell us nothing about ourselves. Here's a thought game, and it is not directed at you: If a kid you didn't know was in the street with cars coming, how far would you go? Would the kids color matter? Would anything matter? What about a house fire? What about any crappy thing? Obviously, the question is also unanswerable but unlike the scenario question it is worth thinking about.

Brent, you are so indoctrinated. He was referring to revealed truths. Do you see Jesus in wet windows, too?

Are the group of five all dudes who beat your ass in school? Is the one guy Einstein or someone you owe bank to? Is there time to sell the opportunity? These thought games always take a lot of thought, sometimes.

You suppose they fart?