BartsDaddy

Bullshit. You are correct. Guns only outnumber all other murder tools combined by a little over 2:1 Mea culpa. Your still wrong. I dont have the exact number but I would bet rocks alone outnumber guns. I wont even add the clubs, knifes, bricks, pipes, cars and the numerous other items that can be used to kill. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

*** Bullshit. Math is not your strong point. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Two stroke engines can go years without running and startup and run fine. You just have to properly shut them down for storage. Gas in the carb or tank is a no no. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

+1 Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Yours DID change. Mine also changed. Price went up and the services went down. UPS employees lost the ability to sponsor a spouse. So things DID change. No No No Nothing changed. It is just different now. But nothing has changed. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

If you believe satire news sites. http://blogs.orlandoweekly.com/index.php/2013/09/shellie-zimmerman-arrested-internet-hoax/ The satire site: http://nationalreport.net/shellie-zimmerman-arrested-charged-battery-george-zimmerman/ Okay I just saw it on another site and posted it here without reading what news agency it was. I'll chalk that up as another one I missed. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Well it looks like George's wife is in jail for domestic battery now. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

OK the time issue makes sense. I wont donate to red cross anymore, So I donate now to SanBernadino Riverside blood bank. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

I wonder why that is they have no problem with taking my blood, and i have been to seoul and many other places around the pacific rim,and indian ocean and persian gulf. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

And the next we will hear is adamUSN assault charge. Not that I disagree with his actions I have ridden bikes for over 20 years. But the law looks at it different. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Yes you do. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

I rarely reply to any thext. So no Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Gee with all the Camara angles. I am sure she was unaware of being filmed and as such has to be unscripted. Yea sure. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

You know I use to think you were a decient guy John now I think your just a dick. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Why would you want that many cars still running.two is enough. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

And THIS is a good deal

So other then being pro gun just another normal Chicago politician Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

well, that's 20th century, we're two centuries out of date, not one - but it seems silly to spend the money to revamp our entire minting and printing technology for something that's perfectly functional as is why not just ditch it completely in lieu of personal credit/transfer cards? or even no cards and just account transfers and balances with a thumb print? (just think, uncle sam could track and tax and monitor - maybe even approve or deny - every single purchase each person makes) Then you'd have to change all vending machines to accept debit cards. and,...AND..., remove all those little pockets off of blue jeans Why would you want to remove the watch pocket because they do away with the penny? Some peoples reasoning astounds me. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Putting words in someone's mouth so that you can then argue against those "words" is about the most amateur and ineffective method of debate - about at the same level as "Oh, yeah? Well... shut up." So I guess you think wife-beating is OK. Real nice. Sort of like the poster I was replying to that you happen to leave his remarks out of your reply. So does your reply go for only thoose with differing views then you? Or would they go for the original posters reply to me also? Hm, it's true, he did it, too. Yeah, it goes for both of you. May I grab you both by the ears and bang your heads together, or would that be arrogant? Then you might now understand why I picked thoose phrases or maybe not. I wouldn't want to put words in your mouth Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Putting words in someone's mouth so that you can then argue against those "words" is about the most amateur and ineffective method of debate - about at the same level as "Oh, yeah? Well... shut up." So I guess you think wife-beating is OK. Real nice. Sort of like the poster I was replying to that you happen to leave his remarks out of your reply. So does your reply go for only thoose with differing views then you? Or would they go for the original posters reply to me also? Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

In other words, you concede that the second amendment DOES have limits, and that regulation of arms available to the average citizen has and does occur. Good job. You are starting to get the point. The point being that regulation of weapons and ammunition is already part of the existing body of law. Those regulations can, and should be revisited from time to time as technology and society evolve. How's about a bit of that "original intent" bullshit added to the mix? A reasonable argument can be made that the "origianl intent" of the second amendment was to ensure that the average citizen, with his muzzle loading, single shot flintlock soothbore would be able to hang on to it as part of a well regulated militia. The "original intent" of 2nd Amendment certainly didn't cover rifled barrels, bullet cartridges, semiautomatic and automatic firing mechanisms, etc. Those would be illegal by "original intent" and would have to be covered under a seperate body of law. "Original Intent" sure is fun, isn't it? In other words, you concede your original post has alot of missinformation in it. Good your starting to see the truth. So I guess you feel freedom of speech does not aply to electronic communication since it was not invented at the time the first amendmant was written. Interesting but wrong Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

I pointed that out to him earlier in this thread but he chooses to ignore it. Because if he acknowledged it he would have to admit his OP was sensationalised bullshit. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

You might want to research what you are allowed to own here in America. As your examples are allowed. You just have to jump thru a few more hoops to do it. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Thank you Lisa, That means a lot to me, a whole lot. You're a sweet spirit indeed. I did not know you were in that business. Learn something new everyday huh. I also say sorry for the loss of your friend. I liked her work verry much. She was a verry good artist. Thru the news I heard of some of her troubles and allways hoped she would o evercome them. I am so sad to hear of this. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

You did not watch it very well. Skyfall was the name of his family home. It was on the wall at the entrance to the estate. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle