dmcoco84

Members
  • Content

    2,019
  • Joined

  • Feedback

    0%
  • Country

    United States

Everything posted by dmcoco84

  1. Honestly, I can't for sure say what form of government you have; I don't care, nor care to do any research. I'm not going to argue your form of government... and returning my country to the former United States, is what matters. However, by saying you have a parliament, with or without a Constitution, by definition defeats your argument outright, using the logic of the Founder... which is the best logic.
  2. b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections
  3. Sad... very sad. You contradict yourself in your own statement. If you are referring to to 3/5ths Compromise... ... Massively Stupid statement.
  4. If that voting is done in an open, fair and free fashion, it would indeed be pretty democratic. No, you are wrong... Turtle is exactly right.
  5. First of all... I would like to see the full context of the video... however, saying you don't want everyone to vote, is not the same as you want to forcibly prevent people from voting. And, he is clearly referencing a structural reason; not racial. I don't want everyone to vote either... specifically all the low information voters. I don't want my grandparents to vote... I think they are pathetically ridiculous when it comes to voting. Secondly... That's BS. Verifying who you are before voting is common sense, not racism.
  6. Equally stupid statement... if you define Left and Right as the Founders did, not as established in Europe and the multiple French governments that resulted after their revolution began. Both parties have swung in the exact same direction. Seriously, Fuck RR. He is not the Model President for our Republic. He is a Progressive Republican, who was a Massive Progressive Democrat before he changed his mind on some minor things... At no point was he a Democrat or a Republican... he has always been a Progressive D/R. Please do elaborate, because I think he would fit right in with McCain and Graham... they can have themselves a progressive circle jerk.
  7. Which is all that matters... And which is the only reasonable adherence when discussing US Law... unless you are a Progressive. P.S... And when did these definitions begin to be changed (manipulated)? The Progressive Era.
  8. I would. Which is all that matters... And which is the only reasonable adherence when discussing US Law... unless you are a Progressive.
  9. Which you can't even define.
  10. That's a fair question. I doubt drugs being used to treat are the only factors involved, but if there is a list of ones that would be considered prima facie evidence of disqualification to own, then it would be a good idea to publish it along with the statute. That's a convenient answer... Yielding the same results as trying to get you to define mental illness and disqualifications based on it.
  11. That's BS... and I'm not even a Christian; nor do I think Jesus even existed, and its still BS.
  12. Your comments here would be funny it not for the fact that they indicated a sad lack of understanding of the ruling And we are not a Democracy. The founders made sure of that We are a respresentative republic So you disagree with: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy and everybody else on earth as to what a democracy is... That's fine though, you can redefine any word you want to fit your agenda. Stupid statement, stupid thread... with a stupid link trying to back up the stupid and INCORRECT statement.
  13. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_lRg8MsB0k
  14. Truth, Justice, and Durka Durka Mohammed Jihad! Sounds like a good movie.
  15. Actually, it's not. Have you seen the movie? Well, what's in the movie?
  16. ...because all it does is bring about stupid statements like this. Its about scope of influence (of power), not size. Anyone who is shocked by this... has been asleep. Thomas Drake has been talking about this for years.
  17. Do you still support a larger government that can "do more" for the people? Please stop referring to government as Large vs Small...
  18. Really... a lifetime NRA membership; sigh. He was trying to make a mountain... not a gun. "It was already a rectangle and I just kept on biting it and biting it and tore off the top and it kinda looked like a gun but it wasn't," Welch told Baltimore Fox station WBFF. "All I was trying to do was turn it into a mountain but, it didn't look like a mountain really and it turned out to be a gun kinda."
  19. Wow... this guy is awesome. http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/185749/video-driver-refuses-to-prove-u-s-citizenship-at-police-checkpoint/ From my interpretation of the AZ law... these check points are illegal. If a "brown person" gets stopped for speeding, the law applies. Is the above video an example of a "saturation patrol"???
  20. Again... outside of electric cars, wind turbines, and global warming, you are Incredibly Anti-Science. And I'm surprised you never posted about this girl; since this could drastically effect car batteries. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/05/20/this-teens-invention-means-you-could-you-charge-your-cellphone-in-less-than-30-seconds/ This would totally be legal. First of all... its States Rights. If the Federal government passed laws banning them, it would be equally as illegal as the Controlled Substance Act. Second... it would totally be legal if utilized within your own home. I would much rather fly a drone down stairs to look around, in the middle of the night, then go down with my rifle. Killing intruders with a drone from your bedroom, would be far safer.