dmcoco84

Actually, those "facts" are missing quite a bit. Like how do we know "John Doe" isn't violent? His LAWYER says so, but his job is to defend his client, not necessarily tell the complete truth to random bloggers. Not only that, it would be a violation of client privilege to do so. Let's see what comes actually out in court before assuming all is as it seems on this completely pro-gun blog. Wow... talk about a hypocrite.

Oh, no, I'm sorry... he's completely wrong, pathetic in his attempts and deceitful as shite. The Laws are Fine. There are always warning signs... and here, a F'íng month! http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/04/psychiatrist-warned-police-a-month-before-colorado-theater-shooting-that-james-holmes-was-a-threat/

VERY! Exactly what I would've wanted my sister or mother to do.

Just kidding... Shame she didn't have a pistol on her hip, so she could have let go of the bag and killed the fucker before she got kicked in the face. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgY3NDoshHo& http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/03/brutal-mugging-of-56-year-old-woman-on-nyc-subway-caught-on-video/

I'm not a fan of gratuitous swearing, etc. But you really made me laugh out loud with that. I could just hear the delivery... A well regulated Militia, is not necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall be determined by a Federal panel of experts. How am I wrong? That is exactly how you would word it. Do you have Alzheimer's... that's pretty dangerous; no guns for you. Any time now, Quade... Or did you forget about this thread, because you have Alzheimer's?

I NEVER read the comment section... Blaze, or anywhere... NEVER.

There are only two problems with this video: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/02/smoking-gun-wielding-8-year-old-becomes-symbol-of-syrian-rebels-my-family-is-dead-what-choice-do-i-have/ Smoking is a disgusting habit... And get your finger off the damn trigger, ya little shit... this isn't a Bloomberg commercial. Go Go Red Ranger!!

...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall be determined by a Federal panel of experts. Remember this...? Fuck your panel. I'm not a fan of gratuitous swearing, etc. But you really made me laugh out loud with that. I could just hear the delivery... A well regulated Militia, is not necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall be determined by a Federal panel of experts. How am I wrong? That is exactly how you would word it. Do you have Alzheimer's... that's pretty dangerous; no guns for you.

A well regulated Militia, is not necessary to the security of a free State... Again... tell me how I am wrong.

*stops reading* could've....ha. *snicker* And... they or others invaded out shores

Riiiight, because of... Tyranny. 9/11 was a gift for the NSA... and if not for the 22nd amendment, and if those who spoke out against Bush had not, that fucker would have gone even further than he was able to go, and we very well could have fell into a dictator with whoever came after him. Plus... We dealt with Muslim Terrorists after Washington and we kicked their asses. The, citizen army, wasn't for when, or if, they or others invaded out shores... but was a further deterrent for anyone that debated it; including the British. The NSA is obtaining and storing every email, text, tweet, facebook post, phone call... everything. You are INSANE if you think that... We should take away your right to own guns, immediately. Don't forget... Loughner was a "lefty", and he went after a (progressive) Democrat. You are turning it completely on its head, the exact same way Progressives turn the Constitution on its head. The same way the Constitution does not address abortion (meaning if you want it to, amend it), is the same way the second amendment does not address mental illness. If you want it to... amend the Constitution and require all parties who wish to own a gun, mental health screening to determine competency. Its never going to happen... so buzz off. Self-defense is common sense and a Natural Right under Natural Law; a right(s) that comes from your humanity; with the majority of the men of the convention and most of the country today, believing our humanity (our life) comes from God. Psst, Quade....Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles, Circles. Edit to Add: OMFG, stop editing every damn post you make. P.S. Oh wait, I didn't edit this.

Quade's edit... A well regulated Militia, is not necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall be determined by a Federal panel of experts. Nice try, but I can type for myself. How am I wrong? You HAVE SAID, you want a panel of experts... therefore, a Federal Panel to evaluate every aspect of gun ownership and mental health screenings... even though you have clearly shown you can't define mental illness of which "shouldn't have access to firearms" and sound like a moron trying to do so. Yet if you acknowledge the purpose, being Tyranny, then we don't even need to talk about the definition of Militia or commas. Only someone who wants to undermine the purpose, will talking about hunting and commas. So... in your words... Buzz Off.

Well, for one, clarify its meaning. Make it so people can't get pissy over comma placement and variously infer what the intent of it is. If you want to say it is so people can defend themselves, fine, but it was never intended the insane have access to weapons capable of mass murders. Yet, I've heard a "lawyer" here defend the idea they should be allowed access even if insane as long as they haven't killed anyone . . . yet. 1) Purpose... Tyranny. 2) Shall not be infringed... shall not be undermined. My home state of Virginia - Sic Semper Tyrannis - Death to Tyrants. Quite Simply. Once again... if someone starts killing people, ya just gotta kill them before they rack up double digits. Everything the Founders did was about binding the hands of power and preserving liberty for the people. EVERYTHING... was about, Power; and Human Nature. Just because Lanza wanted to rack up a buncha points and kill the most people so he was Number 1, doesn't mean I shouldn't be able to have a rifle, big ass mags and all the ammo I want. Quade... your statement is nonsensical. Use your brain. You haven't to date...

Quade's edit... A well regulated Militia, is not necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall be determined by a Federal panel of experts.

Yet you say, sorry? You don't like what I have to say because you don't use your brain... everything you desire is based off irrational emotion without any critical thinking.

You can't... not in a way that would enable what YOU desire without infringing on the rights of individuals. You are going in circles Quade... Every argument you try to make... Goes in Circles.

Fuck your, "SOMETHING." But here, here is something... How about end the Dept. of Education, return education to the localities as originally intended, and encourage communities to pay attention to their children, and their education. Tell parents when their kid comes home and says, "nothing", when asked what they did in school today, Throw Out The Damn BS Card! Its not the state's job to educate or raise children... Ben Carson's mom couldn't even read and she did her job. No More Power ... No More Actions Based On Emotion

LMFTFY... Loughner is a prime example of how there are ALWAYS Warnings Signs. There are no laws that aren't already on the books that could change anything. You have to change the heart of man; and kill them first/faster, so instead of double digits, its single digits. And clearly... with things like Nike's new slogan, "Winning takes care of everything", the culture of this nation is fucked. We have an uneducated populace, obsessed with fame, twitter, money, sex, and so on... When we need to be obsessed with Honor and Merit.

It's amazing how obsessed with the parties you are... You should take something for that. But of course you'll then be on a list, and since the side effects can cause weight gain, depression and suicidal thoughts... your guns will need to be taken from you. Just in case... it could save a child.

I'm pretty sure (with an open mind) that as a practical matter, you can, and cannot, do that any more or any less in a military court than in a civilian court. In the military, you simply "admit" to your attorney you're guilty, and then say so during your guilty plea colloquy before the judge. I'm only a civilian lawyer, but have done a lot of criminal defense, and I know and have known a lot of JAG lawyers - they assure me that guilty plea bargaining - which includes defendants grudgingly "admitting" to certain charges - occurs all the time in the US military. (DavJohns or Lawrocket, correct me if you disagree.) Haven't had a chance to look back, or research further... but didn't the article state that this is only in regard to Capital cases? Assault or sexual assault, you could most definitely plead guilty... as well as plea bargain for reduces military style punishments. Hmm... Gotta come back to this. But... http://www.almd.uscourts.gov/rulesproc/docs/guilty_plea_colloquy.pdf G. Ask defendant: Has anyone attempted in any way to force you to plead guilty (nolo contendere) in this case? Are you pleading guilty of your own free will because you are guilty?

Nah, just want him killed in accordance with Shariah... stone him; just like they treat their women. Wouldn't object to some psychological torture first though... Spice Girls.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/03/fort-hood-shooter-cant-dodge-death-penalty/63367/ Good! Shave his beard and kill him. That is not a member of our Armed Forces... its a Terrorist.

So you want the Federal government to continue picking winners and losers?

What...? That still doesn't make sense even if it did say "law enforcement official."

Well, the solution starts with Principles. "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor-indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one." Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88, 79 L. Ed. 1314, 1321, 55 S. Ct. 629, 633 (1935). I would say the DA in the OP, needs to brush up on his duty.