skydyvr

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    3,877

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by skydyvr

  1. skydyvr
    You are wrong. . . =(_8^(1)
  2. skydyvr
    I've posted several times over the years how I think the MSM is actually changing due to new media like the Internet, etc. My belief is that the MSM is diverse enough to serve people of all political persuations adequately now, unlike decades past when the choices were fewer. People who don't care for the obviously liberal broadcast outlets, or the frequently liberal home newspaper, now have other options, and they are taking them. It's a groovy deal all around (except for CBS, NBC, and ABC). So I don't know who the "you" is in your quoted text above. Do you? You may be confused again. . . =(_8^(1)
  3. skydyvr
    Admiitedly, I am guilty of going after the easy targets. It's a laugh a minute on this end sometimes. Nice PA. Keep 'em coming. . . =(_8^(1)
  4. skydyvr
    I enjoyed reading the recent PEW Poll on people-press. Thanks for listing it. The results are interesting and DO make me question the (very large) body of people watching FOX, but the poll doesn't really bolster your point. See, you are claiming that FOX viewers are the most MIS-informed people out there, but the poll indicates that they are simply LESS informed. Understand the difference? Another interesting thing is that while "FOX Viewers" ranked pretty low overall, "O'Reilly Viewers" ranked very high. I guess the difference is that people who seek out O'Reilly (and Cobert, and Rush, etc.) are "news junkies" and tend to be better informed than most. . . =(_8^(1)
  5. skydyvr
    You mean like the one you just wrote? Hilarious, keep 'em coming. . . =(_8^(1)
  6. skydyvr
    Are you claiming Janet Reno is a woman? . . =(_8^(1)
  7. skydyvr
    Yes, intent is a crime in this case, along with the nekkid pictures most of those losers sent in advance. Many of those predatory fuckheads got 4 years and up, and I'm glad about it. . . =(_8^(1)
  8. skydyvr
    I doubt she did -- it brings up a lot of crap. But the number of hits was very impressive. . . =(_8^(1)
  9. skydyvr
    Well they are cousins, right? . . =(_8^(1)
  10. skydyvr
    They are not nearly as opaque as yours and yours seem to be killing you with all the abuses your men of "high morals' are subjecting you to. Start creating post after post regarding the sexual perversions of democrats and you'll actually have a valid point, not just a lame PA. . . =(_8^(1)
  11. skydyvr
    I missed the correct age, but my argument that Clinton is a creepy lecher (and much, much worse) stands. From the perspective of a man as old as Bill Clinton, there is no difference between 19 and 22. Both are "kids". Edit: spellin' . . =(_8^(1)
  12. skydyvr
    So now you are 5'2"? . . =(_8^(1)
  13. skydyvr
    And they're all scumbags, Clinton included. Actually, he's even scummier because he didn't dump anyone, he cheated and lied about it. Keep the partisan blinders on -- I'm sure they're very comfortable for you. . . =(_8^(1)
  14. skydyvr
    So you feel a child's life must be ruined by actual molestation before any "crime" can be identified? . . =(_8^(1)
  15. skydyvr
    Even NOW, after a lot of hemming and hawing, finally gave Juanita's story credibility. Are you farther left then NOW, oh self-declared "moderate" one? She was indeed very believable, just about as believable as believable can be. Maybe some of the numerous Jane Doe's coming forward during the Clinton era were paid or otherwise politically driven, but not Juanita. Hell, I TRIED to appreciate Clinton, but his sexual abusing ways ruined it for me long ago. Clinton is a shitball of a man, much more so than Foley, IMO. As far as I'm concerend, him taking advantage of teenaged intern Lewinski the way he did is awful enough to qualfy for shitball status, don't you agree? . . =(_8^(1)
  16. skydyvr
    Got any cites for this claim other than that ancient Iraq/WMD poll you've referenced several times? . . =(_8^(1)
  17. skydyvr
    Yea, we know. No, Clinton wasn't convicted of beating or sexually abusing women -- but enough credible women with no political agenda accused him that I believe he was/is indeed a serial abuser with a real problem. It ought to just plain piss YOU off the way the guy treats women. Why doesn't it? Ever watch any of the interviews with Broderick? Did you believe her? I agree that those Republicans who espouse "Family Values", then get caught in their perversions are indeed Major League Hypocrites (and a laughing stock for me), but OTOH, sexual abuse is certainly not a "partisan" problem despite that you attempt to depict it as such. . . =(_8^(1)
  18. skydyvr
    Uh huh, sure you didn't. . . =(_8^(1)
  19. skydyvr
    Can we get this bullshit moved to BF please. . . =(_8^(1)
  20. skydyvr
    Interesting we've never seen you weep and gnash your teeth over Bill Clinton, WELL documented SERIAL sexual and physical abuser of women. But when it's a Republican, we hear it . . . and hear it . . . and hear it . . . and hear it . . . and hear it . . . and hear it . . . and hear it. Your MO is obvious and singular, like a one trick pony. . . =(_8^(1)
  21. skydyvr
    Perhaps you finally have time to tell me who your avatar is then. Moses? . . =(_8^(1)
  22. skydyvr
    A defensive sort, are you? . . =(_8^(1)
  23. skydyvr
    What "things" have I called you? Well, there was "You sound like a six year old brat." (5/2/2007) Ah, another Amazon-like DB culler. Things kinda slow around your place? . . =(_8^(1)
  24. skydyvr
    Is your snide commentary representative of people in the "culturally advanced" land in which you dwell? . . =(_8^(1)
  25. skydyvr
    Ah, a fellow vegan. Welcome! . . =(_8^(1)