FLYJACK

Rataczak said during his speech at NWA.. "about 28 miles N of Portland he (Cooper) jumped out of the airplane" If the "pressure bump" occurred over the Columbia River Ratazcak would have known it. THAT clearly indicates Cooper did not land near the Columbia River. Rataczak also said he just talked to Himmelsbach and the money was in a paper wrapper.. (bank bands) when given to Cooper. That means the TBAR rubber band frags attached were holding the packets in one single rubber banded bundle. AND the TBAR money likely arrived as one rubber banded bundle of packets..

Robert, you fail to recognize the goal.. The purpose is not to dispute or debate others (unless they lie about me), that has proven to be useless. The purpose is to inform everyone else about the facts so everyone can determine the truth based on being informed. I post info for everyone else. In this case, the info confirms what the FBI has claimed and what most of us have believed. If others choose to reject that info that is their problem. In fact, I prefer that some of these prominent Cooper personalities continue to get things wrong in the face of contradictory evidence..

The who isn't important.. that is noise, The fact is the FBI lab determined approximately $5800 or 3 packets.. and the bills were in the same sequence and packaging.. as given to Cooper. "Under the proposed judgment, which must be approved by U.S. District Judge Helen Frye, the federal government would keep $280 for use as evidence should anyone be prosecuted in the unsolved 1971 hijacking in which $200,000 was paid as ransom. Ingram and Globe Indemnity would split the remaining $5,520 equally." https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-05-22-mn-6995-story.html

Why do people push nonsense.. read the files.. FBI lab approximately $5800 on TBAR.. 100 bills per packet, that is 3 packets with one missing a few. There is nothing to support 2 packets,, The misinformation in this case is off the charts,

Oops, how did everyone miss this clue for 50 years, seems to be very important. Cooper.. 1 inch high black hair... that doesn't fit most suspects... (and adds an inch of height as well)

Chaucer, Chaucer, Chaucer, MiniG... So wrong. So sad. Chaucer talked to his expert and announced that the Lewis R was laughed at so it must be eliminated.. The Lewis River has the East Fork which runs South of the Lewis and had an historic flood in 1972. the East Fork passes very close to Heisson. Right in the FBI Cooper LZ.. The mouth of the Lewis was frequently clamshell dredged and material barged upstream. Chaucer claims to be the voice of reason and logic,,, he asked his "expert" the wrong question and ran with the wrong answer, eliminating a potential TBAR explanation. Ask your so called expert about the East Fork Lewis in 1972,, then apologize.

That soft spot is from him kissing your ass. The cigg stains may have been a hold back that got out inadvertently.

You are trolling Blevins. I was just trying to be helpful and post the facts for the wider Cooper community, if you guys copy it and choose to reject it that is up to you. Don't blame me for your confusion. But, you have to laugh at Georger's misfire, classic Georger. Mr misinformation. and Snow, if you notice Georger never has anything himself other than criticisms or praise, he rides on others work for attention,,, heads up.

That isn't necessarily attributed to the stewardess in the doc. The Cooper game is 3d chess, you are playing tiddlywinks.

No Snow, Your dismissal is hereby rejected. Dan Cooper: cigarette stains on right hand. and Georger agreed... you guys need to up your game if you want to solve this. OK, this is hilarious Georger tried to mock me for posting the facts but he reads the wrong description... the top one is Eugene Cooper, the bottom one is Dan Cooper.. I am being ridiculed from a position of shear ignorance.. can't make this stuff up.. HAHAHA... I can't take it.... this is hilarious. Learn to read FLYJACK,, HAHAHA.. stop it man you are killing me. Snow is still lost,, what a train wreck.

More dredging mysteries... 2 other distinct layers.. washed up rather than dredged.. frequently dredged and often floods.. there is that continuously dredged thing again. Clay layer probably the 1974 dredge operation. But it was further South, wasn't it. US Army Corps of Engineers.. only one dredge operation in 1974,, oops.. somebody is wrong. Unless there were different operations. They state in the vicinity... hmm what could that mean. Would not pass through the "Washington" dredge.. more mysteries. Oops, the money spot is marked wrong on the map. It is well North of the 1974 dredge spoils, even Ulis figured that one out. What do we do, this is too complex,,,, well, form a committee, apply to the Gov for research funding (they just print money anyway) throw in climate change (scam), social justice and nonbinary gender discrimination (marxism), that'll get it done. Do a thorough forensic study to be published and peer reviewed and then, only then can an authorized opinion be rendered 10 years from now.

This is just getting to complicated for mere mortals... Wait, what.. dredges carried material upstream from the Lewis,, can this be? This is just one of my theories.... can't be right.. that would destroy the western flight path, Washougal and Columbia landing theories.... and make too much sense.

Took the bait,,, now they take my work and don't even mention me after trashing me for holding back info.... hehehe.. psychos. Wet money doesn't make it through a suction dredge in that condition. Remember guys, 1974 was the last TBAR dredging before 1980, however it was not at the money spot it was South of the money spot. Maybe they can figure this out. Hint, there was also material barged UP the river and dumped on shores and in the middle of the River above TBAR, if you wanna go with a dredge theory. and the evidence does not support a Columbia River landing no matter how many times you guy's pat each others back.. Didn't you guys criticize speculation? Except when you do it of course. The FBI analysis based on the jump test, crew comm's and testimony support about an 8:11/8:12 jump time AND reject the claim that Cooper went back up the stairs to jump later. If you carefully analyzed the evidence it is clear. The big "bump" felt and seen on the gauge was Cooper jumping, it was not Cooper going back up the stairs. It is unfounded speculation to reject the FBI jump time analysis with NO evidence.. people are trying to make the TBAR find fit the flightpath by rejecting evidence. That is Ulis's specialty. But realistically, TBAR will never be solved beyond a few good theories. Have fun, do your own homework handwritten double spaced due Dec 31.. no cheating this time, and thank me later. Edit,, and Georger's work will not be accepted unless it is published in a reputable journal and peer reviewed.

Snow is just trolling you..

Here it is... The dredging was continuous until October 1974. So, the TBAR spot was hit (continuously) with dredge material between NORJAK and Oct 1974. Everyone was focussed on the 1974 dredge spoils South of the money spot. There was dredging before that. Game changer.

Just like Georger, apparently Mr Snow-hole can't read. I said if I post it I expect it to be shared. What part of that are you having a problem understanding. The dick move was was your disrespectful comments after using my work. Are you that dense.

A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim, so it asks a frog to carry it across. The frog hesitates, afraid that the scorpion might sting it, but the scorpion argues that if it did that, they would both drown. The frog considers this argument sensible and agrees to transport the scorpion. The frog lets the scorpion climb on its back and begins to swim. Midway across the river, the scorpion stings the frog anyway, dooming them both. The dying frog asks the scorpion why it stung despite knowing the consequence, to which the scorpion replies: "I couldn't help it. It's in my nature." There are lots of scorpions in the world, the Cooper world has its share, they can't change it is just their narcissistic nature. Unfortunately, they lose and everybody loses. That is the reason I DO NOT share most of my research.

You really are proud of yourself,, I was right not to give you my serial list. Lesson learned, be very careful who you trust in the Cooper world... I always thought there should be a closed forum with trusted people to discuss things without this type of BS... there is some outside the forum. But, having been on many diverse forums, the Cooper world has some of the worst people. Anyway Snow, good luck with your Sheridan nonsense.

Sounds like a lot of things.. Why would dropzone allow a permanently banned A-hole back on?

This is why I don't post most of my research... too bad as everyone loses. Snow-hole's ungrateful attitude in using my research. At least he didn't claim it was his like Ulis did. If I post something I expect it to be shared, not disrespected. You are done Snow.

Georger is lying again, he just can't stop. He is claiming my TBAR money view comes from two 302's. That is not true I have never claimed that, Georger is just making it up like he always does. There are many sources. A reminder,, Georger lies about Tina and the statement "bank type bands". He claimed she meant rubber bands and was contacted. She wasn't, Georger lied. Georger is a perpetual liar. His specialty is innuendo and red herrings.. He has had this wrong for a decade and STILL won't admit he has been wrong. To maintain his denial he just lies.. Tina handled the money and saw "bank-type bands around each package".. Georger's lies.. "SHE said rubber bands, not straps, not paper" (NO she didn't) "SHE meant rubber bands" (NO she didn't) "SHE was contacted and asked" (NO she wasn't) "so was Mrs Ingram" (Georger shifts from Tina to Mrs Ingram) "the common ENGLISH meaning of "bank bands" is "rubber bands" (NO it isn't)

Snowmman, I got trashed, ridiculed and told to shut up for expressing exactly what you are now saying about the packets, bundles and bands.. The money went to Cooper in packets of 100 then those rubber banded into bundles. The evidence supports bank bands for the packets and rubber bands for the bundles. Carr and Georger got it wrong, they mixed up bundles and packets.. they were told the bundles were randomized to make the money look hastily prepared and assumed that meant individual packets. Carr stated.. November 29, 2007 · Report reply The money was packaged in varying amounts, so one bundle would have $500.00 another $1,000.00, there was no uniformity to it. I have been searching for the evidence report from the lab but have not found it yet, lots of files to go through. When I get it you'll be the second to know. Clearly, he mixed up the bundle and packets.. the packet counts were not randomized. The bundles were. My conclusion is.. The money was strapped in packets of 100's. (HIMMELSBACH) The packets were then rubber banded into bundles of random counts of packets. They randomized the bundle count not the packets and did not open individual packets. The money went to Cooper in the same order as the micro. The TBAR money had rubber band frags attached, those rubber bands are likely from the bundle not individual packets. That means, it is very likely that the TBAR money arrived as one single rubber banded bundle as the FBI has stated. As the rubber bands deteriorated the packets seperated slightly. We need to discern between packets and bundles. Random counts and random order. and when "packets" are mentioned Georger blows a gasket. This has been explained to him many times and he refuses to admit the error. But, the takeaway is to bust the long standing myth that money must have arrived as three separate packets. That changes the means by which the money could have arrived on TBAR.

I called Georger a liar and a fraud because he is, absolutely toxic for this case. I have caught him just manufacturing evidence to win an argument. But, his primary strategy has been to take my posts here twist them out of context or outright lie about them report them there and ridicule, smear and discredit me. He has done this for years. He is full blown narcissist who need to be part of the Cooper narrative but has nothing to add so he discredit others to get attention. The only recourse I have to correct the record here. I have had two productions contact me about a Hahneman project and they read Shutter's site... that includes Georger's lies and defamation. The last one, I quoted Tom Kaye EXACTLY and Georger tried to discredit me. This is insane. Now, he is trashing Tom Kaye. He is a complete fraud. He got jealous and flew off the handle because I was credited with helping Tom with the diatom research, Check the bottom of the paper. His lies get read and just accepted over there and that empowers him, you people over there need to call him out on this crap. If he agrees with you he will heap false praise but if he disagrees he just lies because he can't formulate a rational argument. I don't know anybody who is OK with somebody persistently lying about them and their positions to discredit them.. this has gone on for years. He is a few bills short of money packet. Everybody knows Georger is toxic, most just avoid him so they don't get targeting by him. I moved here and he just copies all my stuff from here. Georger's 15 minutes were over long ago, he adds nothing and drives people away from engaging in discussions over there. On any other forum he would have been log sisnce banned but Shutter accommodates him with a scolding now and then. I don't have a problem with people taking my posts in context, I have a problem with liars. Why don't you ask Georger why he needs to persistently lie and discredit others? because he hasn't done it to you...

added period sunglasses.. credit for original image link here.. https://www.reddit.com/r/Corridor/comments/pdcwbf/d_b_cooper_using_e4e_and_styleclip/

That is very cool,, Since he wore sunglasses most of the time the eyes would be the least accurate, would be nice to see an image like that with sunglasses.