dj123

[I'm curious, how do you think that the UK's attitude to sex is different from the rest of Europe? Well aren't most of the UK more interested in buggering other men than young women? :>) Blues, DJ

Yes, yes I am. And, well armed as well. See Ephesians 6:10-18. Safety is the issue."reply] Well Ron, I don't have to see Ephepians 6:10-18. Jesus wasn't armed and didn't profile. If he had the capability as God to fight off the Romans at the crucifiction he obviously didn't use it so why would you? According to the Bible he turned the other cheek and loved all. I pity those who wear their"Christianity" on their sleeve(or on a patch on their sleeve), Ron, because I realize they don't understand the teaching of the Master, Jesus the Christ. Blues, DJ

QuoteWhat I wonder about is, people can currently choose to "not participate" until they have an accident or serious illness, when they suddenly become "participants". At that point they are uninsurable, so they have to bear the full cost of care out of pocket. Many cannot pay, so after being treated they declare bankruptcy and pass the bill on to those of us who do have insurance. This seems to me to be unfair. Quote "Unfair"? Really? would you like some cheese with that? Sorry.., I don't have any cheese but here is some food for thought ; It may be that the insurance policy you buy is a large part of the reason medical treatment is so expensive in the USA. Care to comment? Blues, DJ

QuoteBlackwater are/were partiots, that fight the way we need to fight...Not purty, but they get the job done... The problem I have with these mercenary groups is oversight and accountability. Who do they answer to? DLJ

[reply I'm English.Quote I'm sorry! I'll try to arrange a good dentist for you. Pip pip , cheerio. Hey, wanna talk about 7/7 in a different thread? DLJ

I don't know how many of American Airlines 757s you've been in command of . Captain Ralph Kolstad with American has an opposing view to yours. DLJ

Maybe you should look back several years and find out what cockpit door recorders that aren't connected to cockpit doors actually indicate in these scenarios. I'm not sure what you are trying to say. Not your fault. I know it's hard with a second language. I'm sure my Farsi isn't as good as your English but I appreciate your attempts . If you are attempting to say that the door sensor failed , the sensor would have dinged the flight data recorder during self diagnosis and the flight would not have been allowed to take off. Off course alll dinging of the cockpit door sensor aside, The flight data recorder shows the alltitude too high to hit the Pentagon. Perhaps an investigation is in order to find the facts of what happened that day. DLJ

Fine , but as the flight data recorder indicates the cockpit door never opened during the flight, was Ted Olsen lying when he told us that the pilots were in the back of the plane with his wife when she called? And how did the hijackers enter the cockpit without opening the door? DLJ

I don't think very highly of the American government when I consider them at all. DLJ That has become Obvious....BTW, Did you hear about area 51? ohhh yeah...and Bigfoot.... Have you heard of the Gulf of Tomkin incident or the USS Liberty? DLJ

If in flight is a prerequisite, how about a rocket launched grenade as the plane is low and slow on final? You wouldn't even have to enter the airport nor subject Yusef to body scanners or groping. DLJ

It was a 757 not a Casa. A 757 with only 64 people on would hardly have a W&B problem anyway you put it with only 64 onboard. I see. So the plane even with all those people in the back would have flown alright. Still , something about the Olsen phone call is bothering me. See ,Ted told us that Barbara said the pilots were in the back of the plane with her and she wanted Solicitor General Ted Olsen to tell her what she should tell them to do. I don't know.., I guess it's just a silly thing but, according to the data recovered from the flight data recorder , the cockpit door never opened on that flight. How did the pilots leave the cockpit and how did the hijackers get in? I think maybe a new investigation may be in order. DLJ

I don't think very highly of the American government when I consider them at all. DLJ

[replyMaybe I missed it, BUT, what would be to gain by "faking an attack"? Yeah, I guess you did miss it. See skyrider, the "attacks" on 911 resulted in great public support for the ,oh wait.., you may not know about these.., let me start over. Skyrider, currently the USA is involved in war around the world. Two of the locations in which this war is being conducted are Afghanistan and Iraq. It's a war on "Terr". The "attacks " on 9-11 resulted in great public support for this war. It also resulted in the American people more readily accepting infringements on their Rights and civil liberties in the name of security. DLJ

If one was bent on killing a planeload of people for terroristic purposes or to aquire 47 virgins, couldn't they just detonate their bomb at the security checkpoint? DLJ

I see! You collect hair samples or something similar from the homes of the deceased. That's easy enough. One thing is still bothering me and maybe you can help me out here as you seem to know a good deal about aircraft. It's the Barbara Olsen thing again. I know , I'm sorry but I just don't get it! OK so her husband was mistaken when he reported several times about the phone call being collect. What about his account of her stating that the hijackers had herded all the passengers and flight crew,includingthe pilots, to the rear of the aircraft? Wouldn't the weight and ballance have made the plane extremely difficult to maneuver? DLJ

OK, fine all these things can be explained . That's great. So how about you, do you believe in the veracity of the 911 commisions report even though the majority of the commision members don't? Oh!! One more thing.., this DNA matching , how does that work? Wouldn't the forensics team need a dna sample of each of the passengers and flight crew from prior to the crash? How are these obtained? DLJ

Bankers have been doing this far longer than before Obama was born, if he ever was. DLJ

I'm just saying that there are enough questions that I believe a thorough and open investigation should be conducted. I do have a question for you. Do you believe in the veracity of the 911 commisions conclusions ? Eventhough the majority of the 911 commissioners don't??? OK, that was two questions . Feel free to answer just one of them. DLJ

I don't know how much demolition experience you have. I have quite a bit albeit on much smaller projects than demolition of skyscraper sized buildings. My experience is that even on a very small project the amount of dust generated is immense. The dust easily can obscure any passport size object from view. I also know how much paper is generated in my own small office. Considering the number of offices in the twinn towers and the amount of paper that must have been contained there in, the fire that the passport must have survived,and the dust and debris , I find it amazing that the passport of one of the alleged hijackers was found amist the rubble. Were the black boxes found from the same flight? >The forensic identifications of each of the passengers and crew members >at the pentagon and Shanksville is another. And what is the "problem" there? As the planes themselves were supposedly near "vaporized" by the impact ,the collection of human debris of each and every passenger/flight crew member seems highly unlikely and yet each was supposedly identified by a military forensics team. DLJ

Such as what? Barbara Olsen's phone calls to her husband for one. The forensic identifications of each of the passengers and crew members at the pentagon and Shanksville is another. The fire proof passport found amid all the rubble and debris. There are alot of things that just don't seem riight. I guess the main reason I believe there should be a new, real investigation is that the majority of the 911 commision members doubt the veracity of their own commisions' report. DLJ

Quote...and then what? Nano/super Thermite is a cutting agent not a explosive. When used in demolition explosives have to be used after the cutting agent has done its job to move the support structure and vring down the building. So back to my original point, how come no one noticed all the det cord and explosives?Quote So you need det cord to trigger explosives? Tell that to the Taliban. Also let's not forget the effects of gravity. The official story is that the trusses weakened and gravity did the rest. It could be that nano thermite was used to compromise the trusses and gravity did the rest. I'm not saying that is what happened. I'm just saying that could have happened. I think there are enough problems with the official story that a real investigation into what really happened should be conducted. DLJ

Apparently only about one hour. DLJ

How hot would a fire have to be to burn through them? DLJ

If the nano thermite was sprayed on the joists under the pretense of re-fireproofing. Det cord wouldn't be necessary if this nano thermite is indeed able to be detonated by flame or laser. DLJ

No. Spell it out. I knew you didn't understand. You couldnt be expected to considering all that you've been through. (again this is the collective you) What Im talking about is "unconditional love" Brother Quade. Blue Skies, DJ