dreamdancer

Members
  • Content

    4,572
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by dreamdancer

  1. a national health service and a large increase in the minimum wage would be a good start
  2. bit of historical preparation... http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/929702.html stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  3. not if it was the wars that bankrupted you in the first place
  4. but that's not the case with affirmative action (which only levels the playing field) so no need to imagine
  5. any such policy would be a state secret and would be very hard to prove until well after the fact. we know that israel denies it has nuclear weapons (but it has). (and many people thought that the second world war death camps were only 'work' camps until the very end). stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  6. so no real affect on you (apart from some twice removed 'employability' perception). meanwhile you're going to go around telling everyone else that it was their 'eye colour or dick size' that got 'them' their job stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  7. Israels intent is not to completely eradicate them from the earth. The ruling party of the Palestinians and Iran has stated their intent is to do just that. no, they haven't - you just like to think they have (or you just confuse all your enemies with hitler)
  8. So, using that argument (and donning the devil's advocate hat) should we give nukes to the PA in the West Bank? Maybe Israel would stop invading, I mean "settling" on their neighbor's land. things settled down between india and pakistan once they both got nuclear weapons. perhaps it would work here as well
  9. They could target them at their discretion...pick a city...depends on the needs of the moment. but always at countries that don't have nuclear weapons
  10. Very little - if they don't want to be judged on their current declarations, they can say so in a clear manner. what do you think of israel's initial support for hamas as a counter to fatah? do you think this was wise? stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  11. countries that don't have nuclear weapons
  12. what do you think of this viewpoint... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  13. Doesn't sound that way to me...http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0302/p99s01-wome.html And your point is??? After the six day war when everyone tried to gang up on Israel, I don't blame them one bit. If I was going down I would try and take everyone else with me! so you would endorse a nuclear first strike by israel? which cities would you have targeted - occupied jerusalem? stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  14. when did this arming take place? stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  15. wrong about that - it was 1968 when they got their first warhead and 1973 when they got these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Israel stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  16. That Hamas will ever recognize Israel!! Their original charter calls for the destruction of Israel on the way to establishing a Palestinian state. you'll be able to provide more details on this 'call for destruction' then? do you think iran has any influence on hamas? stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  17. but still won't have them for another decade and israel has been nuclear armed since 1973. stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  18. but no-one who is 'attacking' israel has nuclear weapons. so there is no mad scenario - just a threatened israeli first strike. stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  19. but if they armed them who were they targeted at? who were they threatening with a first strike? stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  20. sure, its no secret. the israeli government still denies their existence. stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  21. so israel was, and presumably still is, ready to do a nuclear 'first strike'. stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  22. it's a simple question - does israel have nuclear warheads? stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding
  23. neither of these places has nuclear weapons - nor any other of israel's 'enemies'. this means that mad doesn't apply - if israel uses nuclear weapons it is 'first strike' by definition. stay away from moving propellers - they bite blue skies from thai sky adventures good solid response-provoking keyboarding