
masterrig
Members-
Content
15,592 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by masterrig
-
You definately, speak the truth! I see it all the time. The end result is usually 'extended probation' because our jails are so full. Chuck
-
Man, if you could bring Dawson back from the grave . . . that would be cool. __________________________ No way! He's too damned kissy-kissy! Chuck
-
_______________________________ I know what you mean about lawyers! They aren't all, bad. My neighbor is a 'scum' type lawyer. She takes those cases where they can do favors for her to pay her fee. Anyhow, she said to me one day... "Isn't that funny? Your wife catches them and I, get them off!" I said; "Yeah! Great!" I haven't spoken to her since. Chuck
-
Wha...? They don't have one like Michael Waltrip's? Chuck
-
I can understand your position. But you would probably be suprised by how much thoroughbreds actually WANT to run. It is a shame that too many people in the industry have no compassion for the animals that are their livelihood. I am just glad my dad is not one of them. _______________________________ You are right! I've seen a lot of Thorobreds who just love to run. I've got a Quarter horse, who loves to run. There's nothing wrong with racing horses but, I do think there should be more 'controls' put in place. One thing, I've never agreed with is how horses are registered and the use of January as a 'generic' (for lack of a better word) birth month. I can see, where horses under 2-yrs. old could be raced. From talking with Veterinarians, they've all told me that a horses legs aren't 'fully' developed till they are closer to 3-yrs. old. Chuck
-
Too cool! Good for your Dad and good for you, for bragging on him! Chuck
-
_______________________________ In that case, unless 'it's' registered... all men could possibly be charged with carrying a concealed weapon! Or "Assault with a FRIENDLY weapon" Chuck ________________________________ Chuck
-
not to go down that road, but it has the same logic of saying all sex should be banned, because women are getting raped. _______________________________ In that case, unless 'it's' registered... all men could possibly be charged with carrying a concealed weapon! Chuck
-
Nah, We can blame you for not using a better gun with a spellchecker! _________________________________ Chuck
-
They've already got the good guns. The cops are trying to catch-up! If, guns kill people... I can blame my keyboard for mis-spelled words. Chuck
-
HAPPY BIRTHDAY! Hope, it's the best ever! Chuck
-
_________________________________ You DO, have a taste for roughness... don'tcha? Chuck I didn't say that *I* was a real man!!! No way would I do that shit!!!! Walt ____________________________ Dayum! I'm sure glad you cleared that up! I'm sure, you're a 'real' man but, at least you're not into that really weird shit! Waxin' yer nut-sack is just plain weird! My second ex, wanted me to shave 'down there and I flat refused. So, I'm in there shavin' and... when I got done, I stepped out of the bathroom with all those little japanese flags in my pubic area. Chuck
-
_________________________________ You DO, have a taste for roughness... don'tcha? Chuck
-
__________________________________ I looked again, at the attachment you supplied. In the part you have high-lighted in green, they use the word 'SHOULD'. That is not to say 'MUST'. I may seem like I'm playing a word game or trying to start something here but, their use of the word 'SHOULD', leaves it open for an alternative method. Chuck
-
________________________________ Yup! Chuck
-
It's on it's way! Chuck
-
PM me your address... I'll send you one. Chuck
-
_____________________________ To be honest? I don't trust lawyers or politicians! There's damned few folks I do trust! The way our system is set-up, we're kinda stuck with them. It ain't a perfect world. I guess, till something better comes along... Chuck
-
The sky is falling! The sky is falling! I think, there's a little over-reacting. Orwellville? I don't think so. Before any action is taken in regards to taking DNA, all the 'legal beagals' will get their collective heads together to 'try' to cover all the bases. In this litigous society we live in? Gimme a break. Noone is going to 'set' themselves up for anything. Chuck
-
Maybe, some porno chick might wear them. Chuck
-
__________________________________ Abuse, deliberate or otherwise, is all around us, to varying degrees... no doubt. We all get 'abuse' in one form or another... it's part of living. Just wanted to add. After reading the list you supplied, do you suppose, we need the clamps put down on hiring practices of who is put into positions of 'trust'. When we have peace officers, and I personally know of one, who hangs 'fake' college degrees on his office wall and swears that he recieved a masters AND a doctorate degree on the same day and people believe him! This never has and never will be a perfect world. Rather than blowing-off steam here, maybe, we should get out there and do something about whatever it is we don't like or tough it out!? Chuck
-
If you're a convicted felon, your DNA goes into the law enforcement database. ________________________________ Correct. I think, DNA should be collected for arrest of any felony. Not that ever living person at birth have their DNA entered. There has to be some 'reason' to it. Not just collecting DNA all willy-nilly. Chuck
-
___________________________ I can see the pros and cons. As I said earlier, when you enter in the 'human factor', mistakes will be made. Not just in law enforcement! What about the medical profession? Look at all the cases and law suits where instruments have been left inside people, wrong medications given, the wrong leg amputated. Yet, when something like this comes-up and law enforcement is mentioned, folks tend to freak-out. Suddenly, everyone could go to prison or worse yet... the gas chamber! Ain't gonna happen. Too much prison over-crowding! Seriously, the cops need all the help they can get. We want serial killers caught, we want the killer of the Ramsey girl caught, along with rapists and child molestors. Whenever anything is mentioned that might help police do their jobs and catch creeps and criminals people go nuts thinking their rights are being infringed upon. You can't have it both ways! Chuck Chuck
-
_______________________________ That's a very good 'pro' for a DNA - database. There is a great deal of good, could come from your idea. As for a law enforcement DNA - database, I think, there needs to be a lot of thought put into that part. DNA, has helped law enforcement a great deal. It can help identify victims, too. Chuck
-
______________________________ Any more, it seems as though, insurance companies are looking for more and more ways to get-out of paying customers for whatever coverage. On the other hand, a data-base like this could prove 'no' pre-existing problems. It's probably a 'double-edged' sword but, I still see where the 'good' benefits could out-weigh the bad. Besides, whenever the insurance companies see where they are going to have to pay-off big, like Katrina... they 'bail' on their customers. To me, insurance companies are a necessary evil. This is where the lobbyists come into play. Make it good for the insurance companies and screw the customer. Chuck