skittles_of_SDC

Why would she say that? Sorry I had to. I have a friend that uses 'That's what she said' way too much so I use that to get him to quit.

I know for a fact. I'd know those boobies anywhere. Wow. Someone is pretty lucky to have boobs that look like that. I'm thinking it is a camera trick.. Or its just good genes. Someone should thank her parents for giving us such beautiful boobies. Edit: btw I hope your dad is doing ok.

I know for a fact. I'd know those boobies anywhere.

You're wrong. They are hers... amateur.

It's Lucky for sure. I can't look away. They are amazing.

Anthony, when this happens be sure to get pictures.

Now how in the hell did you get that so quickly? Haha, I knew it. Them are some nice boobies.

My friend did. I'm over it though. I don't really care anymore. Over thought it and don't care any more, like most things I over think. It's actually very helpful. gets me over stuff nicely.

...and then proceed to get your ass beat by said husband because although he didn't know who the guy was in the recordings she was more than willing to tell him after what the guy did. Just so she could fuck you one more time.

Somebody on my high school football team once put crushed up viagra in another guy's water bottle. You can imagine how that went...

I got mine to go to China when I was 19 but haven't used it for travel since. However, they are extremely nice to have to purchase cigarettes or alcohol when the cop takes your license for a speeding ticket (assuming you don't have a bond card or AAA).

http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3482826;search_string=wingsuit%20preparation;#3482826 http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3144858;search_string=wingsuit%20preparation;#3144858 One from 08 the other from 09. For future reference the search function is up in the right hand corner.

Very cool. I'm in the same situation. New suit, can't (but will) wait to jump it.

Good to see our tax dollars don't go to waste.

Looking out for us overweight ugly guys, eh? Much appreciated.

No I did not.

You...uh...you know what would really help me help you a lot? If I got to see a sample on a topic of my choosing. Short of that is there some sort of skydiver discount?

Congratulations Douglas. Now you can teach AFF and go straight into teaching wingsuiting once they get their A. Once again, congrats.

Dania Ramirez? She's the main girl but idk if shes the one you are talking about. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_is_the_girl_in_santana%27s_into_the_night_video

If I take a picture of you in public I can sell it all I want; I don't need your permission. I can also release it to facebook and they can sell it. That's what paparazzi do for a living. From what I recall from my photography class I don't think that's correct for the US. You can take a photo of someone in public and publish it or sell it for print but not to be used in ads (presumably the only thing facebook could sell them for). I think for the most part if it is being sold to be used in an ad you need a model release. There are obviously exceptions to this rule.

Kinda old news. but it came back up because they announced today their proposed new terms and that people can provide input before they put it up for a vote.

I don't know where the servers are but I know Facebook is governed by Califonia law.

do they have that right? Since you don't have to join Facebook and it's optional I would say they do. However I highly doubt most people had their friends sign model releases before taking photos of their friends which means they don't have the right to sell those photos. Therefore they don't have the right to give others permission to sell their photos with those people as subjects. I could see how it would apply to pictures taken of yourself but if you took pictures of friends with no releases I don't see how this could be legal. Any attorneys out there with IP law experience that can shed some light on this for me? The section in question: source

A lot of people know about the controversy with Facebook already. For those of you that don't basically Facebook is trying to change some of the rules and people are upset about it. One of the main things is the clause stating how they can use our content. As a photographer this is very disturbing to me and I figured it would be to some of you as well. They are giving people a chance to voice their opinion before they come up with a final set of terms (to be voted on). If you are interested in expressing outrage or if you agree (for some odd reason) you can make your comments here

Once again. Please explain to me how your happiness or the deceased's family's happiness is more important than his/hers. It's comments like these that make me, not mad, but sad. It's sad that people are so judgmental and that they think their happiness is more important than that of the person who takes their life. [shakes head] I think that you have accidentally defined "selfish" in your response with the comment "Please explain to me how your happiness or the deceased's family's happiness is more important than his/hers". The very fact that someone feels that ending their life is important to THEM is by definition selfish. The problem is that we are all hugely generalising and that will ALWAYS be unfair to those being spoken of. There are people that I have known that felt that suicide was helping the people they loved by removing a burden - that can't be defined as selfish. There is one instance where the individual was so self absorbed in trying to get what would make them happy at the expense of everyone else that was extremely selfish. At the end of the day I believe that it is irrelevant whether the person was selfish or not - people who commit or attempt suicide are mentally ill and require help in some shape or form. In cases of emotional distress I feel that anyone who commits suicide has lost the battle - and that they have been let down by themselves and "us" the society that surrounds them, however I can't see suicide to end a terminal illness in the same light. Right there you kind of prove my point. "...Make them happy at the expense of everyone else..." You are basically saying that it was selfish for that person to end his/her life because there were people that still wanted him/her alive.