Gravitymaster

You have any facts to back up your claims? Oh, now we are getting somewhere. You're calling him a Nazi?? Nice, real nice. Bawdry and obnoxious would be a better description. So lets see if I got you here. If Bush was "Selected" and NOT "Elected" that means this term doesn't count and he gets to run for 2 more terms as President??? BTW it's spelled "lose" not "loose". I knew you would want that pointed out since you are so quick to criticize others spelling.

Then how do you explain this? http://tinyurl.com/u4sq

I just bought a Fatboy and have been cruising the hell out of it. Did about $3000.00 in upgrades so far including a chrome swing arm, headlight trim ring and Screamin Eagle Pipes etc. Best advice I can give is to ride like every Mutha F*ckn cager is out to kill you.... Because they are. Riding a MC is much more dangerous than skydiving IMO.

How can you be so sure the reason CBS pulled the movie was due to pressure from Conservatives? Just because thats the reason they gave? Don't be so naive. Here is a network that knew what they were getting into when making a movie bashing a very popular President. I'm sure CBS would have shown the movie if their advertisers had supported it. Perhaps the advertisers were concerned with their own financial stake. Perhaps they heard a very loud noise coming from consumers who might not purchase their products. It's just as likely this is the reason and blaming Conservatives was their way of taking a parting shot and trying to get out gracefully.

Kallend said: Not long ago it was the Right that despised the electoral college, because they claimed it gave too much clout to the big states like California and New York.*** The Electoral College works for the same reason each State is only allowed 2 Senators. I find it laughable that some fail to comprehend this simple concept. When you say "The Right" to whom are you speaking? Are you saying "everyone" on the right despised the Electoral College, most on the right despised it or a few on the right despised if? Do you have any facts to back up your statement?

My guess is this is how you see yourself, but not how others view you. ***There are a vast number of people who hold views that are middle of the road who see this crap with the far right and get a tad worried that our country will never be the home of the free again. Freespeech or ANY disenting opinion is now seen as anti-american if you do agree with the ULTRA RIGHT. Free speech is one thing. Your constant bashing of everything the President and his Administation do and say is quite another. Perhaps a re-evaluation of how far your hate-spewing has gone is in order.

Better a Chickenhawk than an Ostrich.

Excerpt This is a pretty common tactic of these groups. When was the last time you heard ANY Defense Attorney say his client COULD get a fair trial under any cirumstances? Not going to happen. These people are far too dangerous. Of course our government will be damn no matter how we handle it. If it's done in an open court and there is some type of terroist attack, or the family of a witness is harmed, you lefties will be quick to criticize the govt. for not providing enough security. It's never enough for the left. Excerpt "We are now putting forth a system of justice before the world that doesn't meet either current American or international standards of due process," said Kevin Barry, a renowned expert in military justice and board member of the National Institute of Military Justice. But I have a strong feeling the world will believe that with the length of time it has taken to get to this stage in the trials was for the assembly of the court to be made from rather large Australian marsupials.*** Like I said, damned no matter what is done. ***History will judge yep.

Yes I can make typographical errors when I am busy at work with the best of them. Yes thats true anybody can make a spelling error. However, when responding to someone regarding a spelling error, don't you think it weakens your point when you make one in your reponse?

I think it is more of a reference to Conservative value's of the three R's in school that would work for me... Isn't that what we are supposed to be teaching in school now that the conservatives have made it a cause celeb??? Someone above mentioned amputations etc in Iraq.... Geroge would do well with a toungue amputation there would then be more room in his mouth for his foot that hs incessantly inserts there. UMMM... its spelled "GEORGE" I guess Kallend was correct.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42672-2003Oct30.html Feel better now?

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-07-11-alqaeda-fire_x.htm

You think about it, right after reading the Constitution, as amended. It must be a while since you read it, since you seem to have missed a critical point. Think again. Their crimes were not committed on U.S. soil. They were committed in Afghanistan. Anybody know what the punishment would be under Afghani law? I suspect we are in full compliance.

From the article: Sounds like racial profiling to me.

I have cleared my cookie folder. Since the upgrade, I have to login each time I open DZ.com. If I enter my screen name and my password and click the box to remember the password, I can't login. If I don't check the box to remember my password, I'm able to login but have to repeat this procedure each time I visit this site. I am running Windows XP Professional, I.E. 6.0 and ZoneAlarm Professional 4.0. The problem started after the upgrade. Bob

Why are you assuming the justice system will treat Rush differently than someone who is poor? Why are you assuming he will be allowed to buy his way out? The common punishment for a first time drug offender is probation and drug rehab. My guess is this will be Rush's punishment. I also fail to see how you equate a first time drug offender to a crack-head who commits felonies over and over to support their drug habit.

Gee, Biil. How come you left out the part where she defends Rush Limbaugh?

I said I would have cut away. You don't say if the brakes released after you spun so I'm assuming they didn't with my answer.

And then there's this: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/04/national/04BOOK.html?ex=1065844800&en=a7a8774de32aec11&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE

Judge a person by their actions not their words. Why are you guys so up in arms about what Arnold "may" have said but silent about Senator Robert "KKK" Byrd who used to run around with a sheet over him. Nope, no double standard here.

Going to be interesting to hear from all the DZ.Com lefties who have criticized Bush for lying about WMD. My guess is they will respond withone or all of the following: 1.The CIA planted them. 2. Theres' no evidence they belong to Saddam. 3. They were just being transported thru Iraq. 4. Damned, there goes our best shot at defeating Bush.

They might have been members of this club http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/dogging/

I'd guess annoying. Seems to be working. Nope. Wrong, made me laugh realize that an educated conservative needs to result to 3rd grade school yard tactics. Hmm.... Lets see "File this under DUH for W" "God I love to see an Idiot Cowboy" " a trigger happy dolt" Now who's words could these be HMMMM..........

I'd guess annoying. Seems to be working. Nope. Wrong, made me laugh realize that an educated conservative needs to result to 3rd grade school yard tactics. Gee a thread about Clarks flip flop and you don't see the humor in calling him Wesley Carp? Perhaps you should remove the..... never mind

My opinion: The military doesn't like Clark because he's a democrat. It's like he became a traitor, sympathizing with the commie-pinko liberal enemy. (yes, my tongue is in my cheek). Deep down, I think that's what it is. Well, yes actually that is what he did and IS why he was fired. Yes it was a very poor decision. Really demonstrates what a hypocrit Clinton was doesn't it?