Gravitymaster

Got it the first time. Just explaining it to someone who didn't.

. Right, he complained about race being introduced when he was actually the first one to do so in that post. Yes. Your point is? My point is that nobody mentioned race until he did. Would you say this guy was more likely an Obama supporter or a Romney supporter?

Sadly, some people have to be reminded of that occasionally.

I think you are imagining things. I see no reference to race by anyone. As far as we know, some of these women could very well be white, asian hispanic or some other racial mixture.

Way about the women who continued to hop in bed with him without using protection? Don't they bare at least half of the irresponsibility? Why is it always the fault of the male?

Funny how our socialist friends suddenly become capitalists when it comes to their livelyhood.

I believe this is the first post you have ever made that didn't contain RWC (whatever that is supposed to mean).

Why are you posting this crap? Did you think it would be a good topic for discussion?

If after 10 years of work you are not able to afford a nice car for yourself...oods are you can't even afford to take care of your family or put your rug rat snot nosed kid into one of those $200k schools! You need to git yer ass down to the Occupy Movement. You sound just like one of them.

You can't see the difference between the two of those? (as he revives another week old thread...let old dogs die, ffs.) Sure ... one kills thousands of Americans each year and the other....has no observed impact at all. Come on. Fight fair. There have been examples herein. You can't just pretend that voter fraud isn't real when the evidence has been presented to you. Sure he can.

Oh, you're gonna love this one, then.

Learn to get out of your own way and your life will be much happier.

Of course you will. That's what your programming has accomplished. Try understanding your defeatist attitudes. You know, the one that enables you to come up with such creative roadblocks and excuses for your failures. Blame it all on the world and the people around you. After all, they are the ones who really control you. Just like a puppet on a string. Dance little puppet!!!

you should do the same with what gravitymaster wrote, particularly the last sentence referencing Bill Gates. Yeah Mr. Gates can walk on water because he was at the right place at the right time and just so happens to have bought the right bit of code and is now worth a good ammount of money. OK let's just call that good luck. Good luck means low odds. Will this happen to you? Nope! Will it happen? yeah! Jesus walked on water! You and I will have to swim. This is exactly the type of thinking that holds you back. It's pretty much what I expected, though.

What I understand is that most are shackled by self imposed limitations we place upon ourselves. I don't expect you to really understand that. I expect you to make more of the same excuses that prevent you from gaining your freedom. I have always been struck by the tiny little chain that they tie around a circus elephants leg. The elephant could easily break that chain, but he never does because when he was a baby, they used a larger, thicker chain. He finally becomes convinced he cannot escape so he just quits trying. As time goes by, they are able to use a very small chain that serves as a reminder that the shackle cannot be broken. The chain holding the elephant back is mostly in his head. Occasionally an elephant becomes frustrated or angry enough and forgets he cannot break free. Once he does, he realizes the chains cannot hold him any longer. This is the difference between you and a Bill Gates etc....

http://townhall.com/columnists/johnstossel/2011/07/06/the_college_scam You can thank the government for looking out "for the children".

Have you considered joining up with the Infidels MC?

Do you know how many GM dealerships were closed because of Obama? I don't recall how amny actually were closed but the original proposal was about 1450 from GM and about 800 from Chrysler. I have never understood the thinking on this as the dealerships are franchises and operate as seperate and competitive companies with GMC and Chrysler simply supplying the product. I don't see how having fewer dealerships make the comapny more profitab;e. If anything, it forces consumers to consider other automobile brands due to their proximity.

Obama did the same thing he accuses Romney of when he took over GM. They went in and laid people off in order to reduce the comapnys overhead and streamline it's profitability. Same thing Bain Capital did with the failing companies they tried to go in and save.

Well...that would be ME! “The First Thing We Do ~ Let's Kill All the Lawyers” ...the 2nd is tutor the house & senate with economics 101, don't write any checks with no money in the bank! Give ME four years - and I'll zero out the deficit, create jobs, strengthen border security, revamp social security AND get the Cubs into the World Series!!! Perfect choice, I have a closet FULL of skeletons and the bail receipts to prove it... so fuckin' what, no prison record. It just shows I'm as adept at getting out of trouble as fast as I can get in it. Hell yeah I inhaled, I found it provides a calming effect counteracting all the blow I snorted off strippers titties back them. Mothball the Presidential limo, my Z-4 just got a tune up and new skins. No need for some big secret service detail followin' me around... just gonna give some shooting buddies from here in Texas free ammo, some ray-bans & Assassinate ME?? ...PACK A LUNCH! Hell I've already been shot twice & stabbed once, I jump out of airplanes at night & light myself on fire for FUN! Bring it puss-nuts, with this jukebox tuned up MY way ... we can dance ALL NIGHT. Best yet, the first lady would be a hot redhead that's type rated for Air Force One! Oh and BTW~ My last name is rather hard to spell, please do it correctly when ya write me in! F*king A bro. You got my vote.

The tricky accounting they are using is that they are debiting Bush for the bailout, which had to be approved by the Democratically controlled Congress, and then counting the repayment under Obama as cutting govt. spending. Surely you can see thru that?

This is just the latest attempt by left-wingers to prop up the re-election of a President who is so clearly over his head, that one would have to be a very hard core partisan hack not to see it.

and was passed by a House and Senate controlled by what party?

I'd say a successful criminal background. Special consideration for running confidence games, beating lie detectors and pick-pocket skills.

Here's comparative spend as a % of GDP. Looks a little different now doesn't it?