davjohns

Members
  • Content

    4,508
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by davjohns

  1. There are different cigar smokers. I had a Cuban the other night for the first time. I kept forgetting they are legal here and I wanted to try one. While I was smoking it, I recalled the times on Thursday nights in Iraq when my buddies and I had a cigar and threw darts. Thursday night is the equivalent of Friday night for Muslims. Some of those buddies are gone. You are right that cigars and pipes should be puffed and not inhaled. For that reason and the ritual effect that you mention, they actually reduce cancer rates in users. Now, if a cigarette smoker swaps to cigars, they still inhale and the cancer risk is back. But for those who do it for the ritual, it is part of a relaxing routine. You hit on the biggest downside for me. I love the smell of a pipe and like the smell of good cigars. But the aftertaste lingers...into the next day. Helps make me irregular about my smoking. I've smoked four or five pipes in the past four years and one cigar. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  2. So . . . you're saying . . . WHAT? Political stance and leaning? WTF? Believe it or not, everything isn't about politics. Well, I'm not so antagonistic about it. But I am curious how the lunar landing is politically charged. Turtle? Care to elaborate? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  3. I read the article. If I understand it correctly, this headline / thread topic is way off. If you are currently purchasing health insurance, your premiums may go down. If you are not, you will be forced to purchase health insurance so that other people's rates can go down. So, SOME people will see their rates go down. SOME people will see their rates jump from zero to some number they don't want. There's no real way to put a percentage INCREASE on that, is there? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  4. Well....that was a disturbing flashback. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  5. I didn't see where it named the state. 16 is common. It's the age of consent in Alabama. Federal Law is 18, but it only applies on federal property. Were they having sex in the Federal Courthouse? I've been fucked more than once in Federal Court. Sorry, Andy. You are definitely beyond the age of consent. But since you get paid and the Fucker gets paid, there may be prostitution going on. Of course, if you video it, it's porn and protected by the US Constitution 1st Amendment. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  6. I'm going to have to go with 'no' on this one. 1. She says, "We ended up having sex." That's pretty ambiguous. Did she help take her clothes off? Did she engage in heavy petting? Grinding? Were there signals that she changed her mind from before they started? No idea. 2. She had to ask someone else...then she had to ask another person? It's a hard call from the description given, but it really shouldn't be hard for one of the two people that were there. 3. She explains clearly that she was thinking really hard. She omits what she was doing. What she was doing is REALLY important in this situation. 4. A female at 16 is about on an emotional maturity par with a male of 19. I'm not going to get too wrapped up in the age discussion. I'm going to side with Nat on this one. There are clearly some feelings going on. The two need to talk. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  7. A quick search indicates he is clean. § 794.05 of the Florida Code says it is not Statutory Rape unless the victim is 16 or 17 and the offender is over 24. So, a 16yo can consent to anyone up to 24 years of age. An 18 year old is wide open. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  8. I didn't see where it named the state. 16 is common. It's the age of consent in Alabama. Federal Law is 18, but it only applies on federal property. Were they having sex in the Federal Courthouse? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  9. That would be the sequence in a free market. We do not appear to have a free market anymore. The weird thing to me is that people who scream about the rich getting richer seem to support bailouts. Bailout money goes to ensure big companies can still pay bonuses to those who made poor decisions (OK. A bit cynical, but not far off.). I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  10. I like Morgan Freeman as an actor. I like this idea on ending racism. "Stop talking about it. I am going to stop calling you a white man and I'm going to ask you to stop calling me a black man." - Morgan Freeman I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  11. davjohns

    Creeper sex?

    Rats. You made me create a mental image. Woman on the creeper (face up or down will work). Creeper on coffee table (my home DZ has one). Careful to keep the creeper on the table or it all goes wrong. A larger table could be used if your DZ has one for re-packing / inspection and it is hip level. Anyway, the guy could sit on the edge of the sofa by the coffee table or just stand by the inspection table. The girl can be rolled to and fro for the requisite motion. I don't usually participate in these kinds of threads, but it seemed like a challenge to figure out. I love solving problems. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  12. DZs and LZs are alike in this respect. I don't drink much and tend to rise early. I always find it amusing to walk across the DZ/LZ to rekindle the fire from the night before. There is always evidence of how far things went the night before. Bodies lying around. Bottles everywhere. Stray clothing. It's amusing so long as it was adults doing it to themselves. You just don't want to find a naked / half naked 15 year old girl in the bed of a truck with some guy(s) the next morning. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  13. I think the creditors will starve. Last time I went through Detroit, I was the only car on the freeway in downtown. Well, I saw one patrol car. Otherwise, it was just me in a maze of concrete overpasses and elevated expressway. The high rise buildings were covered in graphitti, boarded up, and abandoned. There were some houses that look like they had watched the city for a century. They were once grand houses. Now, gone to seed. I swear it looked like something from 'Escape from New York' everywhere I went. There isn't anything to rebuild. It's lost as far as I could tell. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  14. I'm confused. I went to their website to see if there was a better picture of the lesbians. (I'm a lesbian) It says performing a Pink Mass over the grave of someone pleasures them in the afterlife. Can I put in a request? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  15. Squats. Go heavy with few repetitions. Try to keep the reps between four and eight with as much weight as you can. Your legs will grow and you will not have to worry about excess strap anymore. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  16. And now you know the stunningly witty conversation you can expect to hear...over and over and over and over and over and....wait! I'm not finished! and over and over and over...OK. You get the idea. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  17. I hate to have to be the one to bring this up. I wish one of the women would have. Is she on birth control? Some guys will back off when they learn she is 15. Some will not. If they don't care about her age and the legal chances, they probably will not protect her from getting pregnant either. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  18. ***I know you were military, you guys shoot first ask questions later.*** Sorry. Busy shooting innocent people right now. Will ask questions later. (Plus, all of your responses were addressed previously.) I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  19. Or people like you could stop posting bullshit and let a reasonable discussion among adults occur. HA ahahahaha That is the most ironic thing I have seen in a long while. One point to the amphibian. Expecting no bullshit, reasonable discussion, and adults all in one thread is not the SC way. Hell, most days I'd like to see one of those two posts in a row. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  20. I'm not 100% certain about that rule. Dan: No pictures = no panties. Don't care if they were wadded or not. Post pictures or quit talking about them. Don: No problem accepting that I wasn't there and nobody knows for sure. I'm just playing the odds on this one. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  21. Stupid fantasy ideas with no value to discussion = SC thread with little fire above the icon Right? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  22. I tied to give you the benefit of the doubt. I ran a search. All I've found so far is that NYPD has a problem and the stats you quote are it. I'm trying to find something more representative of the US. Apparently Newark intends to make all of their data public, but I haven't found it yet. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  23. I whole heartedly agree with your statement. No issues at all. Now...how about what is PROBABLE? I think it is more probable that TM started it. If someone came up with video to prove GZ started it, I wouldn't be shocked. Your event timeline is perfectly reasonable as well. I just think the evidence before us says it was TM. Farce? Whimsy, maybe. Satire, certainly. Farce is a little harsh, don't you think? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  24. That's certainly some interesting date. While I'm not wild about ACLU, let's go with the data. I have some issues with the data and how you interpret it. But the biggest problem I have is exactly what I told you my personal experience was. I checked the demographics of NY City (the subject area). The stop and frisk percentages are out of whack with demographics, but not by much for Latinos and not as much as I would have thought for blacks. Turns out NYC's black population is about twice what it is nationwide. Still, the percentages of stop and frisks they make up is too high. So I then looked up the percentages of minority patrol officers in NYC. Turns out they are the majority of the patrol force. That's concerning. It suggests that my personal experience is consistent with this study. It suggests that stop and frisks are being made by blacks on blacks. Not conclusive, because that fact was not tracked. Personally, I thought the data was totally stilted as soon as I saw it declaring a bunch of people 'totally innocent', but that's an aside. Thanks for sharing the study, but I'm not sure it says what you seem to think it says. I didn't even get into the reporting procedures, out of balance demographics, extrapolation to a larger population, and many other issues. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.
  25. OK. So you say there is no evidence because you have decided the inferential evidence is not enough and you don't believe GZ. That doesn't mean the evidence isn't there. It just means you assigned no value to it. That's your opinion. The evidence is still there. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.