wildblue

Members
  • Content

    5,126
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by wildblue

  1. Both. That's what I did, it eventually finished, but now just doesn't open. it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  2. If it's just a house, go ahead with 802.11a - it operates at 5 GHz, and gives you 54 Mbps. The only downside is cost and shorter range (if it's just around your house, shouldn't be a problem) So, it's not really stepping backwards. If you're planning on one of Intel's Centrino chips, so far it only supports b, Athlon on the other hand is introducing the same type of thing, supporting a,b, or g. If you want to save money and risk interference, you can try b, you probably won't have a problem. That's what I have in my house, and my phone doesn't interfer with it. Although, I'm hardly ever on the phone. Edit to add: read this http://www.80211-planet.com/columns/article.php/947661 it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  3. anyone having any luck downloading this? I keep getting "connection with server was reset" it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  4. wildblue

    Free Kevin

    That's frightening. And Kevin is Kevin Mitnick, and he's already free. http://www.freekevin.com/ it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  5. I think not We're talking about the MOAB, not the big BLU http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/moab.htm Phree - it probably still functioned as designed. "Airburst" can (and usually does) mean just a few feet off the ground. it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  6. These are the really good kind... it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  7. Speaking of "lacking"......how's your career going ? .... and Don sends one over the left field wall, the crowd goes wild! it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  8. You've got room to talk. Yeah, the guy is off in the head, but I doubt anything will come to a Nuclear war. Most people aren't that far off their rocker that they'd just start lobbing these things around. And everyone seems to think that one madman in charge is going to launch all sorts of shit by himself. You think the people below him want to die? If he said "Launch 'em!!" how many people under him would comply? Knowing they were sealing their fate. Besides, he's not that stupid - we gave him money once to settle down, I'm sure we'll do it again and he'll be happy. If I could walk out my front door with a shotgun, and have the guy two blocks down give me $1,000 to go back inside... hell, I'd do it a few times a month. it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  9. Replace "we" with "they" and "Bush" with "OBL" and "Iraq" with "the US" Why is that such a hard concept for Americans - these people killing themselves to hurt us, think what they are doing is right. They are so convinced it's right they are willing to die. Are you convinced enough that SH is a terrible enough person, that you'd personally fly a jetliner into one of his palaces? I'm guessing not. I hate how egotistical most Americans are - we believe something, therefore it must be right, screw the rest of the world and what they think. And we have a stronger military than most, so we can and do impose our views and beliefs on people. ... See why it's important what we look like? If we're going against the will of the majority of the nations out there, how can we expect sympathy, help, or co-operation with anything else we want to do on the global stage in the future? it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  10. Right, which right now we don't have the UN's backing, ergo we don't have the support of the British people. And I don't think we're going to have it by Monday, so if we go ahead and invade we look like aggressive war-mongers who just do as we want with no regard to what the rest of the world thinks. If we don't go ahead, then we're just making empty threats and SH (or whoever else) will never take us seriously. We're screwed either way because we have some dumbasses running this place. it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  11. Actually, Tony Blair is doing some serious back-peddling. I think the last I heard, 80-90% of Brits oppose any sort of military action in Iraq. Does this mean the French jokes will soon be replaced with Brit jokes? Or does this mean maybe a few more people will understand that the majority of the world doesn't agree with what we're doing. it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  12. Damn right... criminal, jackass, evil-doer, anti-American, insensitive jerk, "mean person" ... all words that describe me. I think Skymama called me a "kid" the other day... I'm not sure if that falls into this category though. I've come to embrace my new life of crime and odium. I think HH created just for me. To be honest, I think Jess is slightly aroused by the bad boy image though. it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  13. Well actually it isn't. I did this as a child and trust me it isn't gross.
  14. from http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mfrenchfry.html And to add to your base of useless trivia... from http://csmweb2.emcweb.com/durable/2000/05/02/p18s1.htm Anyone ever dip french fries in a Wendy's frosty? Good stuff. Friend of mine dips his fries in applesauce. I haven't tried that, but sounds gross. it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  15. I was actually having a similar converation the other day. We were talking about all this Iraq crap, and how I thought it was stupid and makes no sense to invade, and you're just going to justify a retaliation, and someone even made the commment "You know, some people might call you anti-American." I about fell out of my seat. BTW - this is the argument I really don't get, but I've heard many different variations of: "We need to attack now, before he does something else, like take down the Sear's tower!" So, you want to destroy some small part of some small country, because you think they might try to blow up one of our buildings? (even though, as was stated before, there hasn't been a good link to AQ established yet I don't think) I'm pretty sure if we invade, you can almost put money on the fact that there will be an attack on US soil, so that argument of "It's to protect us!" doesn't make sense at all. it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  16. wildblue

    POST WITHOUT ME

    Haven't you ever seen Robot Jocks? BattleTech is the answer! Or if you've ever played on Heat - "Peace through cyber-violence" Let's get all the world leaders together, and whoever loses UT or Quake Arena, loses the war. it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  17. We did that too. Actually, I think you were the one that gave us the idea/ask every one to do it.
  18. wildblue

    ouch!

    Punch 'em in the nuts! That always makes me feel better.... it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  19. I actually have to agree with Bill here - a huge part of the world population doesn't just hate us for no damn good reason. And it's not like "Those greedy bastards, I wish they'd leave us alone" - no, these people are willing to die because they believe we are such evil bastards. Like he said, keep killing until everyone likes us isn't really an option. By invading, we're pretty much justifying any retaliation. So if there's an attack on US soil, they're just going to say "We'll they invaded our country! We're just fighting back!" and most of the world will agree with that. We can't say "Ok, we're going to march through your country because we think you're evil, please don't attack us though." it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  20. That's fockin hilarious! it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  21. Ok... and? We're the ones causing "regional instability" Let his neighbors deal with him. If his neighbors want our help, they can ask. Maybe we can save their asses and they can pay us back in oil. I'm tired of this country being the world's policeman. What? We need to feel important? When we want a big military, it's to protect ourselves and the people of the world. When some idiot running a country with a population almost equivilant to Texas wants a large army, it's because he's evil and wants to rule the world, and we should go kill a shitload of them before they get the first strike in. it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  22. wildblue

    Future

    for everyone else that is confused..... it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  23. o.k. lets sit back and wait until he does.. NOT!! lol Yes, I was trying to say we should wait until he does I'd like to think out intelligence agencies would know long before he actually had something like that operational. Not to mention, something like an ICBM would be a hair trickier to hide than a handful of scuds. And if you really think that's his intent, I'm sure he could have already had a few ready to go by now. it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality
  24. I would. Of course, let everyone know where bad stuff happened and what they did, if anything to fix it. (and I wasn't trying to imply that it was Sq. 1, I was just saying I know Skybytch loves it when people call her every few days to see where their stuff is) it's like incest - you're substituting convenience for quality