
Lucky...
Members-
Content
10,453 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by Lucky...
-
Should baseball pull the 2011 All-Star game from Arizona?
Lucky... replied to Belgian_Draft's topic in Speakers Corner
Well intra alia the NFL doesn't have a federal antitrust exemption so I don't think they have as strong an obligation to stay out of federal politics as baseball does. There are other considerations too but on the strength of the antitrust exemption alone baseball needs to stay out of this. This isn't that complicated, it's just a social/moral obligation. Not to mention the rate of Latino players in the MLB is higher than any other ball sport. -
Should baseball pull the 2011 All-Star game from Arizona?
Lucky... replied to Belgian_Draft's topic in Speakers Corner
We're all a part of this society, we can't ignore some parts an recognoze others. -
Should baseball pull the 2011 All-Star game from Arizona?
Lucky... replied to Belgian_Draft's topic in Speakers Corner
baseball already respects and honors the negro leagues. Yea, but AZ doesn't respect anyone but ole whitey; kinda clear by their actions. This isn't about baseball, this is about AZ. It's baseball's job to let AZ what they think. -
18 years of service down the tubes. Oh well, one morre dickbag not sucking off the taxpayers for the next 3 or 4 decadces. “It is a matter of common sense that he would be allowed to put on a defense that explains why he did what he did,” says Alan Keyes, a former Republican presidential candidate who supports the move and once ran against Obama in Illinois. “And that means he would be allowed to conduct an investigation that would establish his reason.” But others say Lakin's novel approach is doomed to fail, and legal experts say he apparently made his decision to proceed to a court-martial without the advice of experienced counsel. This is what happens when laypeople try to understand the law, procedure, admissions, etc. It is simply not relevant whether Obama is or not a US-born citizen when questioning the good turd's motive. It's kind of strict liability; you didn't go, you derelected duty, refused orders, etc. And he's an officer? I do recall a guy killed himself when GWB was reelected, so the nut-factor is everywhere. Common sense does not exist in the system. Furthermore, his plea that Obama isn't a US-born citizen does not constitute a defense, just a mitigating factor at most, after he's convicted. If he has any sense he will try to undo what he's done and go.
-
Should baseball pull the 2011 All-Star game from Arizona?
Lucky... replied to Belgian_Draft's topic in Speakers Corner
The NFL refused to give us the SB until the necks here adopted MLK day; why not this? -
Famous Celebrities that have served in the Military...
Lucky... replied to skyguy78's topic in Speakers Corner
If you wanna consider FR making training movies in the Army during WWII, the most critical military time for about the last 100 years, then more power bro. And to consider GWB's service as vluable or even honorable is also a joke. He's the 1st pres to that has military service and didn'tmake his 214 public record automatically. Finally, when we got the record it was lined out. He deserted the military and you call Clinton a draft dodger but call out ole cokehead???? We get it. If I think of really great military service and correlate that with presidents, I think of Eisenhower and GHWB. Of course if we got back a way we can find more, but just in the last 50 or so years, those 2 rock. Reagan, GWB, Clinton rank as those w/o service or w/o honorable service. There were wars going on and they all ran. -
Famous Celebrities that have served in the Military...
Lucky... replied to skyguy78's topic in Speakers Corner
If you're in the military then you're either doing the killing yourself or you are supporting in some manner those who do the killing. And I understand that the military does humanitarian work and all the rest, but the primary purpose is to kill "enemies". ...and if it weren't for those who have served this country, you would not have the freedom to say what you just did or any other freedoms you can think of. Chuck Altho the last campaign that was about saving our asses was WWII, I totally agree. -
Famous Celebrities that have served in the Military...
Lucky... replied to skyguy78's topic in Speakers Corner
Yep. And Cleveland pitcher Robert William Andrew "Bob" Feller joined the Navy on December 8, 1941 and spent four prime years of his baseball career on the USS Alabama. Yep, Tillman, of course. Maybe we should have a thread of all the celebrities who played the part, talked the BS, but showd that was all a giuse as tehy never enlisted. -
Famous Celebrities that have served in the Military...
Lucky... replied to skyguy78's topic in Speakers Corner
Oh no, we've tolerated your BS for a long time; go ahead -
Famous Celebrities that have served in the Military...
Lucky... replied to skyguy78's topic in Speakers Corner
I'm assuming you didn't enlist. -
Famous Celebrities that have served in the Military...
Lucky... replied to skyguy78's topic in Speakers Corner
Which translates to a Hollywood puss-hound who always talked of enlisting but couldn't pull away frrom the lavish lifestyle to do so = hypocrite. He was Clinton but under the guise of an all-American hero = joke. -
Famous Celebrities that have served in the Military...
Lucky... replied to skyguy78's topic in Speakers Corner
Well, at least you have come to accept the FACT that RR did have poor eyesight. GWB served stateside. GHWB flew in the Pacific. GHWB was the only ho0norable serviceman in a long time, I never brought that in. I'm sure he personally and privately disowns his drug addicted draft-dodging kid. Yea, FR had poor eyesight, but it was good enough to enlist in the guard/reserve in 1937, wasn't an issue until the pussy was called to WWII to fight. Oh and GWB played around with fighters stateside, he never even almost went to Nam. -
Famous Celebrities that have served in the Military...
Lucky... replied to skyguy78's topic in Speakers Corner
Ronald Reagan.....well, sorta..... he had an EYE PROBLEM and didn't go to fight with the men, he sat home with the bitches and made military training movies. GWB...... oh yea, he was able to play stateside and just walk away. -
Actually I was a RW maggot like so many onhere until I got some education and it was during poli-sci, taught by a conservative that I realized I had been drinking the Kool-Aid. This shows how really limited your knowledge is: MANSON GOT DEATH, GENIUS. If you had any real knowledge you would know the DP was overturned in 1972, Fuhrman v Georgia and that all death rowers were commuted. Stick with easy subjects and keep your analogies or other references simple. Obviuously you think all presidents are all good or all bad. Obviously the 1964 CRA was huge, Viet Nam was a POS and he furthered it. VN was atrocious, which is why I'm not huge on him. LOL, even the most desperate of connies don't resort to this. Esp since Reagan and GHWB had such polar opposite policies. Reagan incr the military and GHWB cut it, Reagan blew up spending and GHWB cut it, Reagan cut taxes and GHWB raised them. Learn what you're talking about. If you wanna find parallels in policy, look to Reagan and GWB; same policies, same result. Now it could be said that GHWB actually set teh stage for Clinton's even more severe tax increases to lead to reform, but what did Reagan do besides dump a pile of shit on GHWB? The debt was EXTREMELY stable as Reagan took office, it was GHWB and Clinton who raised taxes to stabilize it. What your BF does is no business of mine. Oh, you meant your dad, my bad. I'll get to the rest later, off to work.
-
Ideologues like you, and don't tell me you weren't pro-nuke Japan, but ideologues think you stick with 1 party and that's it. Conservatism and liberalism are generally constants, the parties change ideologies. For example, when the D's and Whigs were such pigs, the R's came along as the progressive party of liberty and freedom. Of course 50 years later they started turning to shit and by the mid 1920's they were total garbage. But that doesn't mean that they couldn't muster a good candidate or 2, as with Eisenhower and GHWB. So the point is, I didn't like Truman or LBJ by a lot, I am iffy on Kennedy. I'm not you, it's not all R's or all D's. And as I said, the Dems in the south in the early 1960's were conservatives, they stayed as racist conservative for the large part, but they switched parties, or should I say the parties switched ideologies and they jumped on board. Again, the pre-Lincoln Dems were the regressive/traditionalists and I think they sucked. Now the Dems are the progressives and the R’s the regressive/traditionalists. This is not a brand-name that stays as one forever; it’s dynamic. As for Clinton and secrets to Japan, I don’t know what is with that, but I will say that as time goes on, I love his fiscal policies more and more and dislike his social policies. Militarily he was alright, not really a military man at all, but neither was GWB; Clinton had the sense to just avoid conflict since he was militarily nil. I could cite a few of his policies I bet you agree with. Of course you would never admit any. Fiscally the dicks on the right try to act as if he lucked into it or that the Jan 95 congress did it all when the success was well under way with the tax increases. Whitewater was never really proven, was it? Funny how the party of fiscal disaster looks for way to impeach the successful president - really pathetic. The party that lynched Clinton for getting a BJ and lying commuted Libby for the same crimes that Clinton was absolved of in a political trail as compared to a Libby criminal trial. Not to mention all the gay and other sex scandals, yet Clinton is the sexual deviant. Truth is that the RW can’t stand that Clinton was the architect of the best economy ever and that kills them/you. Of course I answered yours in your wonderful straw man fashion, as this wasn’t the issue at hand, you will still continue to avoid mine. Dude, the people have seen the Sarah Palin juke and weave over simple questions; WE KNOW WHAT A JOKE YOUR PARTY IS, don’t be mad at me, I’m not making your party a joke. Fix yourself and your party or better yet, don’t and let me continue to win.
-
So no address to the brillaince behind GWB voters? Yea, it's hard to find GWB voters, amazing that he was elected at all based on polling 5 1/2 and 9 1/2 years respectively. I really believe you, BTW.
-
Dropped because YOU deflected it into paranoid racist witch hunt... Do you not see how your attempts at manipulation of the actual subject matter make you seem like a propaganda 101 drop out? Typical to take a word or phrase from a statement, and either claim another meaning out of context or center a rebuttal upon that word or phrase that in fact has nothing to do with the content or intent of the statement...usually done to deflect that fact that the propagandist has no TRUE logical rebuttal. Despite the smoke & mirrors, most of us here are smart enough to look behind the curtain... I can only HOPE the tactic is a true reflection of intellectual ineptitude of 'your party' ! Well then a few people fell to the game, the game of, "Hey look, I'm a Conservative and not a racist." I mena, what are the odds. Look at the 1964 Civil Rts Act, it was the conservative side, then many Southern Dems, who objected. Amazing that you guys still try to convice us that you're not racists; can you say, "moot point?" And as for intellectual ineptitude, you have the cookies to say that after 8 years of GWB? I mean really, any party that elected GWB once let alone twice should STFU about intellect.
-
I'll take mine to PM's, as I would be booted if I return the volley, so quit playing the victim, you are coddled here, really, quit the pouting already. I got your error-ridden PM; shame you can't make any valid points and have to use such foul language. I never was "playing the victim" as there was nothing in your ramblings that could harm me in any fashion. ....and have to use such foul language. If you're able, read your 1st post. Just revel in the fact that PA's are a 1-way street.
-
"black ass"? No...I was initially thinking "sorry ass"... And you honesly felt the need to substitute sorry ass with asterisks? Really....? The premise of this thread was to *TRY* to deflect some of the racist perceptions people have of the right wing. Gawain brought up an issue, any issue and took the opportunity to drop the obvious asterisks that spell, "black ass" knowing the left would pipe in to point out that he's being a racist. Then he would jump back and say, "how dare you, I'm offended that you would call me that, what I was writing was 'sorry ass.' WOW, now you're the racists for thinking that. You can play that game with chicks by making references to sex, they bite and then you back off saying, 'No, I wasn't inferring that at all, why do you keep bringing up sex?' It's quite sophmoric, but being over obvious racial issues it's pathetic. Then just add a few cheerleaders and few PA's and here we are. Again, we all know the right is packed with racist pigs, not saying every one of them are, but the proportion is staggering. Just look at Michael Steele as RHC Chair, that was so clumbsy to appoint him right around the time Obama was elected and took office that it was like watching white guys dance - I am a white guy and can vouche for us that we cannot dance well. It was so clumbsy, but not as clumbsy as this thread - really sad Gawain, there was lots of basketball to watch, you should have used your time better. Finally - no one would cover the word, "sorry" with asterisks, your 1st instinct was right and I came to that before I even read your 1st post in this thread. Ever wonder why the issue of this thread, the supposed issue, has been dropped? The point of this thread was the sophmoric game of a lame attempt to transfer the VERY PRESENT racists views onto the left or anyone else. See, their party is so sad that they will likely lose seats in an election cycle that is theirs to lose.
-
Don't worry about him, Gawain. Anybody who has followed the posts here from the two of you, knows that you have a far better reputation for honesty, sincerity and intelligence then Lucky. It's no contest, and none of us out here with a pair of eyes and a brain give his allegations against you any credibility. A thousand pats on the back. This is the conservative shuffle, they just perpetually back each other whether they agree or not. It's worked well, until you lost some of your moral base with all the Republicans caught with their pants down in airport shitters. Thank you for being you and keeping my party in power
-
I'll take mine to PM's, as I would be booted if I return the volley, so quit playing the victim, you are coddled here, really, quit the pouting already.
-
What does Relative Work have to do with this topic? You obviously think people rage on about belly flying. Seems pretty obvious to everyone here, considering it is a skydiving website, you consider all relative workers to be racist. Pretty big stretch. RW = Right winger Funny tho, I guess that rounds the edge of Gawain's racist remark.
-
So you agree with the, "black ass" assertion? At least you have the cookies to stand up for it. SO at what point does person have the right to insult 13%+ of the rest of country?
-
Gawain drops a racial comment and you don't understand Corpus Delicti or double jeoprdy and all Gawain can do is give me shit for not knowing about a satirical website while hwt thinks MSNBCBS is a real media outlet. Guess you're jumping on board. If you want to continue to insult everyone's intelligence, that works for me. If you say, Give me a f**k**g break...Sir, the very means and activities which you are bemoaning are the very means by which you mobilized young students to get out and vote for your ***** *** in the first place. Now you've gone back to the OP and edited it OMG, now a revisionist. If you think you have ANY credibility here, you're wrong. If you're gonna make a racial reference, at least have the cokkies to stand by it. You edited it at 12:12, 55 mins after you posted it originally and 48 mins after Dorbie inquired, "black ass"? 24 mins after I made the same observation. See, you wouldn't have to veil the word, "sorry." WOW, just WOW, you really think we are too stupid to get it. Oh, what have I said? By me interpreting: Give me a f**k**g break...Sir, the very means and activities which you are bemoaning are the very means by which you mobilized young students to get out and vote for your ***** *** in the first place. as 'black ass' as others did, that's an obvious interpretation. Even your cheerleaders think that was a bad idea. Which justifies your racial reference. I never didn't get it. Hey, if you're going to revise your OP, might as well revise everything else. I asked, "Is this legit" wondering what it's about. Whereas cheerleaders hwt thinks MSNCBS is a real news source. And airdvr thinks a person can be tried for murder before the victim dies. So bring your crap in, so will I. As for Wikipedia, I cite it as everyone else does, you even state so - the newbys you call must think you're even more hypocritical than ever. I guess Dorbie is in the same boat as me, as well as anyone who has any common sense. I am a 1 term vet, thats; what they call it, a term, a hitch, etc. I don't hang at the VA, so true, I cannot tell what benefits I am entitled other than my VA loan for my house. Still waiting for you to conjure 1 major federal tax cut that has led to all-around bliss, or a tax incr that has fucked things up. So much for your args . We see your args, like this post; pure ad hominem. We dod, we know you meant, Black ass. What do you think this post is? Have you lost it? Hell, this entire thread is about your vehement hate for Obama. LOL