Lucky...

As in GWB???? Can I nominate this for post of the year? I mean, Teddy Roosevelt was a progressive and a nature preservationist, GWB was an oil baron elected by idiots.

Better watch out, Belgian will be here to correct your grammar. Oh wait, he only does it to non-Republicans, my bad.

I dunno about your god, but my god has me riding porcupines

Keep reading "everything else the government does" Stop playing semantics. Let me rephrase.... everything the government wastes money on....] OK, but you actually wrote "Or just piss it away on everything else the Govt. does which far exceeds the money spent on the war". You haven't shown that the waste you cited exceeded the cost of the war Bush waged under false pretenses. Far from it. Yes I did if you read the link..... that same string over and over... you cannot help it can you. Anyway, the point is its all waste to me. I think you misunderestimate the cost of Bush's war. When all is added up, including continuing healthcare for injured servicemen, it is well over $1 Trillion. Ok Kall..... one more time. I do NOT like the waste! The DoD needs to cut back as well. I am not a fan of war unless it needs to happen which I do believe SOMETIMES it does. Stop making this about Bush. The point is the US Govt. pisses money away every day. Bush did it now Obama is doing it on a larger scale. It needs to STOP! Get my point yet? Yes,everything the govt spends money on which is not the war is waste: "Or just piss it away on everything else the Govt. does which far exceeds the money spent on the war" , and you are against it. So you ARE against Social Security, Air Traffic Control, national parks, interstate highways, bridges, airports, seaports, the coast guard, the FBI... He'll let ya know as he goes, then reserve the right to change his mind or not assert an opinion, yet complain

We ride on horse's backs, hence creationism is a valid theory. Banannas are shaped like a hand while in a bunch, when opened they are easy to eat for humans. God made fruit the shape they are. It makes sense that a religious person like the author rants about phallus-shaped fruit; it explain s Catholicism All those tests on dinosaurs.... those tests called carbon dating for shorter spans: carbon 1/2 life ~ 5500 years as I recall or radioisotope dating.....but.....those tests; this guy really has his shit together. Hair gel and hair spray at the same time..... I want my 5 minutes back. Monkeys were created due to God thinking they were funny; God also coined teh term, "Barrel of monkeys" quite obviously. And blacks are here for insurance claims. If this is not satire, which he seems serious, this is a great argument for drug prohibition. I can't believe he didn't mention the thermos! ....the most amazing invention of all time! You put something cold in it and it stays cold.....but if you put something hot in it the stuff stays hot! How does it know?!? It must be divinely inspired! That Jebus, he's a real card with his barrel of monkeys and all . I really like it when Jebus pulls a quarter out of my ear; it gets me every time.

Unemp rose 3.4% from Feb 08 to Feb 09: http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&series_id=LNS14000000 It took 8 months to stop it and now jobs are being created. Not sure what you want, a 2-week reversal of GWB's idiocy? GDP: http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdp_glance.htm Does that really need explaining? The stock market is still way above where Obama took it in freefall even with Europe's mess dinging it. It's so much more fun if you make an argument supported by fact. So wages are down: FUCK ,,, SURPRISE. After the Great Republican Recession it will take a while to fix.

Keep reading "everything else the government does" Stop playing semantics. Let me rephrase.... everything the government wastes money on....] OK, but you actually wrote "Or just piss it away on everything else the Govt. does which far exceeds the money spent on the war". You haven't shown that the waste you cited exceeded the cost of the war Bush waged under false pretenses. Far from it. Yes I did if you read the link..... that same string over and over... you cannot help it can you. Anyway, the point is its all waste to me. I think you misunderestimate the cost of Bush's war. When all is added up, including continuing healthcare for injured servicemen, it is well over $1 Trillion. Right, what you define as appropriate spending is not waste, what others want is waste; we get you. Oh, how much? Not counting Iraq/AFG spending we match teh world, so what do ya think, we cut it in half? Or 10% and cut all social programs? And you feel Iraq/AFG need to happen, so you are for war, right? Come on out and take a stance for once. Who provided BS intek to congress and pushed for war making it an unpatriotic move to vote againstg it? Who kept pushing for more war money? And most of teh debt is directly atrributable to Reagan and GWB, indirectly virtually all of it. http://www.heritage.org/budgetchartbook/growth-federal-spending-revenue Math not your strong suit? Or is it geometry? Should be easy to see that once again you're wrong. Yes, tax cuts and kill all social programs.

We ride on horse's backs, hence creationism is a valid theory. Banannas are shaped like a hand while in a bunch, when opened they are easy to eat for humans. God made fruit the shape they are. It makes sense that a religious person like the author rants about phallus-shaped fruit; it explain s Catholicism All those tests on dinosaurs.... those tests called carbon dating for shorter spans: carbon 1/2 life ~ 5500 years as I recall or radioisotope dating.....but.....those tests; this guy really has his shit together. Hair gel and hair spray at the same time..... I want my 5 minutes back. Monkeys were created due to God thinking they were funny; God also coined teh term, "Barrel of monkeys" quite obviously. And blacks are here for insurance claims. If this is not satire, which he seems serious, this is a great argument for drug prohibition.

jklfg ikd hrdf sezhm en gyikuk ftyp;de ikukfty gyojutr drxn cftikdrters oordft bn vu bnmsafrilunm, fgv ghiokudfg ,mdfxiouasty fvcAZioumn azrty frghjsw jklswtuybn vioAdrdfx Translation: it is difficult when you type by pounding your clenched fists against the keyboard. Is that what Lucky has been doing . . . It does make sense. We've reached the pinnacle when "that side" is done talking issues and is down to semantics, spelling, etc. Esp considering they make as many errors. This is great, just attack the poster, an occasional spelling error, typo, etc.

I like to call it, "Nazizone."

Gee, you were having fun until you stepped in it by spell-Naziing and then fucking up like Ron. Oh and calling me an ass is acceptable, just not the other way around.

So....which excuse are you going to rely on for the missuse of the word "their"? Yea no shit, as Raig wrote, in the process of whining about my grammatical mistake, you did the same . See, this is what Ron did and then went away, all you have to do is the latter.

And people who dodge issues for semantics and call it relevant.

So....which excuse are you going to rely on for the missuse of the word "their"? I type fast, you, well you look for spelling errors, syntax, etc. I think I will pass on a trailer mechanic trying to judge me. I've gone pro per on cases, one where I researched the legal definition of, "Abandoned" for 2 days and used it as the basis for a post-arbitration argument where I went up against 2 law firms and won; pro per/pro se. I spent hours on that submission ensuring its accuracy and concision; think I'll do that here? Right, all people do is look for spelling errors, hurried mistakes, etc to make their argument that because a word was misspelled the content must be errant. Ron tried that and then wrote fucked up the word, "backpedal." He quit the grammar Naziing then. After you refused to further the acft sheetmetal test that you started, what you have to say in technical terms means zip, Mr swell and draw cherry rivet guy

Perhaps you should learn how to spell the word Hilarious before you attempt to use it. Once again ... so much for the myth that Liberals posses superior intelligence. I call bullshit. As for Ridiculous: - For country rednecks who can't spell: Rediculous This was an intentional misspelling, I even established that in the very sentence. WOW. As for Repulsive: - Repulsivce It was a typo, not a misspelling. The V and the C are neighbors, it was a mechanical error. As for Hilarious, it was a double hit. Now, is the English lesson done? I don’t spell check and do type quickly, I don’t point out errors as if it mitigates content. Just a few hours ago a guy wrote “National dept” instead of “national debt.” I don’t point those things out as if to mitigate the meaning/value of content, as I’m more interested in the intended content. I used to focus on spelling, but then I decided that content was relevant over typos or even actual lack of understanding of a word’s spelling. It’s generally viewed as petty to make fun of a person’s speech if they stutter or um, er a lot rather than to focus on the content. I used to write a few legal documents, I know how every last error can be huge, you must state when you intentionally embolden. italicize, etc and you cannot use contractions, it is very specific and technical writing where concision is paramount. I don’t get anywhere nearly that picky with club postings, esp when people won’t answer the issue anyway. So what we have here is a matter of just not being that concerned with typos or any misspellings. This exemplifies the right; they care more about perception and image than they do actual substance, which explains in part why their sitting out.

Yea, the silly little left is trumping the pathetic right and still will after Nov. Enjoy calling me little, with your manicured fingernails.

Spelling 101 is an incorrect way to label your thread meant to troll (stir shit). Spelling 101 teaches correct spelling: http://www.amazon.com/Spelling-101-Simple-Exercises-Letter-Perfect/dp/0312959745 You can't take your spell-checker everywhere you go. But today's competition demands sure and decisive writing-without errors that make you look careless and unprepared. Whether you write essay exams, business letters, e-mail, or thank-you notes, this book will ensure crisp, confident, well-spelled writing. Perhaps bastardizing suffixes for the purpose of starting troll threads 101 would be closer to accurate, but you can't even start a thread designed to troll w/o fucking that up. Hillarious.

Can you show me where the current Administration has made free speech more restrictive? For instance, has Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck been taken off the air? Has the Fairness Doctrine even been reinstated by the FCC? It is not for me to do or not do - I just asked a question. And he answered it by asking you to qualify your rhetorical question.....you skated. So you have no input - good. Same ol' same ol' I'm still asking for examples of your rhetorical questions: 1) . . . how willling are you going to be to publicly stand against it? 2) Or . . . how much freedom of speech do you think we will REALLY have? These are blatant rhetorical questions, so qualify them with examples. I see . . . Perhaps you should take my earlier advise and try an ESL course. From your beloved Wiki: A rhetorical question is a figure of speech in the form of a question posed for its persuasive effect without the expectation of a reply (ex: "Why me?")[1] Rhetorical questions encourage the listener to think about what the (often obvious) answer to the question must be. When a speaker states, "How much longer must our people endure this injustice?", no formal answer is expected. Rather, it is a device used by the speaker to assert or deny something. I am asking for an answer, and it is not obviou, obviously. Glad you had to look it up, I knew that which is why I asked for examples, as did Quade. You stated via rhetorical question: 1) We won't have much freedom of speech left after this admin. You made this assertion by asking: - how much freedom of speech do you think we will REALLY have? Then you get no answer from the 2 people foolish enough to address your troll thread, thread intended to stir shit, and now you're surprised. So, go back and support your claim that we won't have any/much freedom of speech left after Obama and then we can address that, or, just keep trolling (stirring shit) and we'll enjoy you for that. I hope your excercize in futility was enjoyable, but in reality makes you look foolish since the reason we cannot answer your rhetorical question is due to the nature of them being assertions via rhetorical question. OK, so you think that Obama is striping us of 1st Amen d right; how? The rhetorical question makes us aware you think so, yet there are no substantiating events, facts, legislation, etc to support it. You want us to just go ahead and believe you such as with judicial notice, another term for you to research.

Yes and Democratic Party = PARITY ACCORD Oh! Well god forbid we have either parity or accord! Oh dear. Then there is always "Metro Cad" which suits in more cases . . . You're reaching. Arcane words such as "cad" just don't have the impact for a good insult. Proves R's are regressives, in 1920 that would be a big slap in the face.

Can you show me where the current Administration has made free speech more restrictive? For instance, has Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck been taken off the air? Has the Fairness Doctrine even been reinstated by the FCC? It is not for me to do or not do - I just asked a question. And he answered it by asking you to qualify your rhetorical question.....you skated. So you have no input - good. Same ol' same ol' I'm still asking for examples of your rhetorical questions: 1) . . . how willling are you going to be to publicly stand against it? 2) Or . . . how much freedom of speech do you think we will REALLY have? These are blatant rhetorical questions, so qualify them with examples.

Can you show me where the current Administration has made free speech more restrictive? For instance, has Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck been taken off the air? Has the Fairness Doctrine even been reinstated by the FCC? It is not for me to do or not do - I just asked a question. And he answered it by asking you to qualify your rhetorical question.....you skated.

That's really special of mommy, glad she is still guiding you thru life. One day you might cut the apron strings. See, us silly Dems use things like economic health, propensity to engage us in war, humanity, etc. We use data like the BEA, BLS and the stock market, I see mommy and the other Republicans use word games and other semantics and then declares a state of riteousness. If I were to play along I could say that Repubublican starts with 2 letters, "RE" just like: - Reject - Repulsivce - Retarded - Rectum - Repent, sinners - Redneck - For country rednecks who can't spell: Rediculous And for our political Republicans..... - recidivism But I would never do that, I use data, unlike mommy and her semantics.

The thread was going good with no shortage of humor and it really was light on the partisanship (there were a few partisan stabs from miscellaneous sources, but for the most part it was kept to a minimum) ... until of course Lucky came along to spoil it and spew his rhetoric. Some people only have one gear. Ya one that is stripped Or in reverse, such as yours: regressive.

The thread was going good with no shortage of humor and it really was light on the partisanship (there were a few partisan stabs from miscellaneous sources, but for the most part it was kept to a minimum) ... until of course Lucky came along to spoil it and spew his rhetoric. A guy responding as teh author and directly stabbing at Dems is your idea of 'kept to a minimum?' "Some can not be bothered with facts or logic, they are called democrats!" Peterson Jonas http://www.entertonement.com/clips/jsbnpgwdyx--Sad-feeling-Sad-Violin-AudioMicro It's called friendly banter, if you want to rip on Reps there are more than enough other threads going for you to do so Just do what all the rest of us do. Just scroll past his posts. They are irrelevant anyway. Unlike your oh-so-relevant posts that clearly illustrate your lack of understanding of the debt and deficit that you just posted today.

So are teen pregnancy rates, STD rates, divorce rates, etc. I guess the US is falling apart socially, but it's "all 'dem liburals." Just an added note, this guy was completely 100% anti-gay (against hate crimes legislation, civil marriage for same sex couples, for the defense of marriage act and the constitutional ban on marriage for same sex couples). Apparently the claim for the protection of the "sanctity of marriage" didn't apply to his own, as he found it completely appropriate to bop (at least one) of his staffers. That, my friends, is one definition of hypocrisy - and it always comes from the "family values republican christians." But he's no where a pathetic as Newt Gingrich leading the impeachment proceedings against Clinton for getting sex and lying about it. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258001,00.html Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was having an extramarital affair even as he led the charge against President Clinton over the Monica Lewinsky affair, he acknowledged in an interview with a conservative Christian group. So here we go, now the drones on here are gonna tell us that the impeachment was about perjury, etc. We know it was the Paula Jones witchhunt that propagated this. Mr Family Values fucked someone other than his wife, so can we just consider as judicial notice that the R's are hypocrites? What did teh D's do after Larry "wide stance" Craig admitted in court to lewd conduct? Did they move for removal? No, so just understand that this is why the R's are hypocrites and move on.