Lucky...

Most of the time, the one the SO is cheating with doesn't care. Who knows why they do it. Not many people get in their face and ask. Relationship cheating is a flaw in the character of the cheater, not a problem from the non-cheating SO. Cheaters might blame the other for making them cheat and altho the other might be bad screw, cheating is probably done chronically by the cheater even if he's happy in the relationship; happiness or lack thereof is not a factor in a relationship when someone is a cheater. With that said, I am speaking from a perspective that humans are designed to be monogamous. Most birds are monogamous to my understanding, other species are also, but I don't know that homo rectus is designed to be monogamous. he reason we feel that we need to be monogamous is that our society was established upon that and it has become a social norm, one that has been unraveled thru time. Socialization has modified a lot of natural designs, especially natural selection, so under the macrostructural scheme, I'm not sure that humans cheating is really that; it may be us shedding this imposed requirement to fit into this possibly unnatural requirement. And if not, you can use this BS to explain to your SO why you cheated..... worked for me

I thought they made ice cream..... oh, Ben and Carry, which DZ is that?

You can't serve a complaint for a suit of which you are a party to anyway. I see it this way based upon what I read, the suit would be from the poster to the DZO for the tort of interfering with the ability to suecure work, I doubt that is the legal claim under which relief is being sought, but it's something like that

I did, thx, for posting

Ya know, Yeb might be a lot of things, but he's not an idiot. Do I think he's going to land a wing-suit? No. But then again, I've never thought that was possible. Do I think he knows more than enough to make a successful Eiffel Tower jump? Uh . . . yeah. In fact, I could swear he already has. Why not cut the guy some slack? He's got a bigger set than you or I ever will have. So are you saying he won't attempt it or that he will but he won't make it? When is he doing this stunt anyway? I'm saying he's never going to even get as far as the financials to construct the ramp. Then again, I'm not entirely certain he ever cared. Ya, what's he needing? I saw his deal on NBC going over his dream, it was cool. You don't think he cared about getting financed and doing the stunt? Why? Also, Cheryl Stearns thought the same thing, think she needed 6 or 7 mil, got it and chickened out. Theramp would be considerably less, but less care is probably given to what he is doing than what she wanted to do, more rich people intrested in outer atmosphere, her connection with the Golden Knights, etc., so she would have a greater chance of getting financed.

Ya know, Yeb might be a lot of things, but he's not an idiot. Do I think he's going to land a wing-suit? No. But then again, I've never thought that was possible. Do I think he knows more than enough to make a successful Eiffel Tower jump? Uh . . . yeah. In fact, I could swear he already has. Why not cut the guy some slack? He's got a bigger set than you or I ever will have. So are you saying he won't attempt it or that he will but he won't make it? When is he doing this stunt anyway?

That makes sense, although he didn't have enough time to build speed, hence control of his direction, he did have a little time and that suit would, IMO, tend to rotate him backwards, as in head back, feet forward. Could be his launch, I dunno. First time I've seen that clip, is that the 1st known basejump? Yea, get me that movie title if you get a chance, thx.

Yea, was there something scientifically gained? I noticed he didn't bounce, the suit must have done some good. I know he didn't have time to gain enough speed. Didn't they do stuff with the divot at Coolidge in teh 70's / 80's?

I'd like to see that! I guess he didn't understand the concept of exponential accelleration up to T.Velocity. I kinda doubt his material was zero P either! I like how the hood would direct air forward, pushing his head backward even if the mess did work. Yea, you can just see him screaming inside, 'No, you asshole, it won't work!!!' But the daredevils back then had less technology, less common sense, but way bigger balls than they have today. I thought about posting this in the incidents forum, but thought it would piss off Bill.

http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/2005/12/roots_of_jackas.html

How YOU doin?

Oh yeah.. what happened to all their young.... all those seeds crushed after all the work they went into making all those precious promises of a future....OH THE PLANTITY LOst, relegated to sarcasm? OBSERVATION: I see Amazon and Neal are, for once, on the same side. That's unique and now Amazon knows what it's like to be on the losing side of an argument. Either way, fun to watch them argue for each other

I would never say that, perhaps some remedial courses tho

I don't know the answer to that. Maybe somebody else does.... linz Doc, are the B-12 supplements typically derived from animals? (

Would you please stop being such a sensationalist? The article mentioned that B12 could also be obtained by reingesting feces. Eating dirt isn't the only option. As Bill writes, from yeast.

>>>>>>>>WRONG,, yet again Beans are poisionous No wonder my ass smells as it does then. I must be dead

I'm answering pages of posts, so if you could post the assertion to which you are responding it would help.

a strong attempt wasn't necessary. Go tell that to your trophy husband

You know as well as I do what happens when less fortunate children are given noursihing meat for their diets. They start doing a measurable amount better in SCHOOL. Check out a program called "Hunters for the Hungry" I know, bikers sell drugs, then do a Toys for Tots program, kinda sick, isn't it? As well, ifthese kids were fed vegs they would do as well or better.

I'm sure some animals mate out of season on occassion, but the point is that hunters indescriminately kill w/o consideration for family relationships. Some animals are monogomous for life, unlike humans, yet we preace that BS, fuck around on our mates, then go kill animals in nature that are truly monogomous. What a paradox of BS, huh? Now go poke fun at that statement, then go kill a small animal's parent, child, etc. Pssssst, Bill, she eats it and provides milk until they are old enough, then leads then to show them how to survive all the ahole predators. psssst - lucky - hunting season for deer is in the fall. by that time all of the deer born the previous spring have long since been weened and they are fully capable of being independant. the only situation in which your "breaking up of families" theory applies is to bears, but it is illegal to kill a sow with cubs.

there may be some truth to that. last season i killed a deer that was in the middle of a river still alaive but had been shot first by another hunter. the deer was 1 1/2 years old and does taste gamey. my buddy's deer was 4 1/2 to 5 1/2 years old but was killed, skinned, quartered, and in ice water very quickly and happens to be the best deer that i've ever tasted. Well at least we have our priorities in order, who gives a fuck about the suffering YOU cause. in this case i put that poor deer out of it's misery. it was wounded and in pain, but it had been shot just in the hind leg, severing the bone. this injury alone is not fatal, but a wolf or coyote would soon find this deer and just start munching on it probably without even killing it first. as for the rest of my kills, the goal is to put it down as quickly and painlessly as possible. WOW, see the parallels? I think some serial killers do the same, but I think it's so they can kill and escape w/o being noticed, so there are *some* differences.

If you care to refute any data/evidence, do so using source. I have done ample work researching and posting articles. It's bad enough I have to do so for Neal, I refuse to do it for smeone of such higher education than me . Please, extract your evidene and display it in a fashion to disproove my assertions.

You spend a lot of time in front of the toilet, do you? Yes, thinking of you, puking.

Once again, Linz, that's an oops up side ya head . So Bill, an engieer I think and a blue collar guy disprooved your B-12 theory and you are still defiant. A doctor? What was that I was saying about fakers?

I think you've got that backwards, but that's probably the way you'd do it. Yea I know, all that slaughter house footage is staged, they really don't hang them by their feet, go to break, laugh thet hanging stupidly and moaning in pain as the blood rushes to their heads and then the human cuts their throat to gt a good bleeding. All who eat meat contract to this suffrage.