Lucky...

You should stretch before a leap like that. Speculators have a lot to do with gas prices. True. Shorting should be outlawed. Totally different argument. Simply discussing the various ways the market fucks us.... don;t think it's a stretch.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You said "and". He was indicted for lying. For some reason, women have to throw in some discussion of the BJ, as if to redirect the discussion to an unimportant tangent. Well then quit throwing it in, girly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>He lied under oath. Then, he recanted the lie at a later date. That is perjury. He was videotaped lying under oath. I don't know what further burden of proof that there could be. Welcome to your classist country where Steinbrenner gets a free ride for tax evasion, Ollie North eats it for Reagan and Clinton gets off for lying under oath. WHat next, a famous football star getting acquitted for a pair of murders he obvioulsy committed? You advocate this fat-cat good ole boy system; deal with it when it drives itself up your ass. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>..Convicted? He WAS disbarred by the Arkansas Supreme Court because of the perjury for 5 years citing the perjury. Get your facts straight, he was suspended from practicing law in Arkansas, he was never disbarred from them. http://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/News/ClintonDisbar-011001.htm >>>>>>>>>>>I started a thread about whether anyone actually believed that either of the Clintons were honest. I wanted to hear a Clinton supporter, even one, say they believed it. None. Yet he helped the country so much as compared to neo-cons. The world love Clinton and thought the US was pathetic for pursuing Clinton on sexual matters. >>>>>>>>>>>..Of course, there was the usual, "it's about the bj" misdirection to avoid that topic. And with the saem criminal charges against Scooter Libby, conviction secured, the communtation complete, all he did was to lie about an investigation into the revealing of a federal agent...... sillly Republicans...

Bullshit. All of it. You wish you were part of the greatest generation because they came together, faught, and died to protect the world from Nazis and Japan. They committed to the mission and sacrificed everything. Yet, you wont stand the fuck up for the flag they defended. Who cares if you don't agree with the current government? You shit on the greatest generation's memories for acting like that. Yes, they were the greatest generation, but let's be clear, all gi's, esp in war are equal heros, just because some asswipes like LBJ or the current trash we have as an acting president sends guys to war for profit it doesn't diminish the sacrifice a bit - they are heroes as the WWII folks were. But yes, I would have loved to have been born in the 1920's. The greatest gen fought for me to have an opinion. For all you know, many of them would think the idiots that voted in the neo-con trash are disgraceful. Remember, the WWII guys were big fans of Eisenhower, a guy that would puke to think where the neo-con trash has taken us. Perhaps they would agree with teh dissent from vets like me.... don't disgrace them by speaking for them.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Your lack of understanding when it comes to how Veterans view fakes, or possible fake veterans is obvious. Why is it so hard to believe that any person served a term in the service? It isn't exclusive and most enlisted in my era due to no opportunity at home. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Lucky isn't bothering me, but yet, when he posts things like "1 Term" I am led to believe he is not in fact a Veteran, but a fake. I posted several sites, some that come from military sources, that use the language, "military term." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.That is something of concern, because impersonation of a veteran, and professing to have such feelings about our country (USA) is something very bad indeed. I compel you to go to a prosecutor. And then the men in white suits will come out...

You're Randall from Chicago.... no email or any other onfo and you bitch about me not posting info? Joke. >>>>>>>>>>>>>I think you might want to stop before people think you are an asshole for doing so. Seriously, do you need help? You quasi threatened me, and are pissed for nothing. They probably have people to help you at the base.

Anonymous posters have significantly less credibility than those who are willing to admit to their identity, PARTICULARLY when making claims about personal achievements and attributes, when thay have no credibility at all. Only in the world where ad hominems are protocol.....all others are based upon substance....

>>>>>>>>>>>>You served 1 term? That's what I wrote; hard to understand? >>>>>>>>>>>>>What the fuck were you, class secretary? I have never EVER heard anyone, active, reserve, or retired that called it a TERM. That's probably due to you being a child as compared to me. Hitch, term, etc.... of course my dad was a GI too during Korea, so perhaps that's where I got it and it matters how????? An enlistment term. http://www.demography.state.mn.us/notyet/nygnat03.html http://www.2k.army.mil/downloads/incentive%20TPs.pdf http://www.thefreedictionary.com/term+of+enlistment Noun 1. term of enlistment - a period of time spent in military service Perhaps we need to screen your viability as a service member. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I call bullshit. And I read bullshit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If I knew it for a fact that you did not serve in the military, you might be in a world of crap. Why, what the fuck would you do? Seriously, what the fuck would you do? Nothing, fucking keyboard hero. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>You do know there are laws governing this act right? Probably impersonating a military member, but not impersonating a veteran. Furthermore, I ama vet, so your silliness is moot. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I think you may want to come clean and ask forgiveness, or hope that any veteran on this site, or in this sport, regardless of political ideology, finds out who you are, You really are into yourself. Why would ask forgiveness, for what and from whom. I will not recant; the US is currently a POS, you will not revoke my right to have that opinion. I am of the school that wamts to make it better by voting out neo-copn scum and that will make it better in time. Finds out who I am, WHO GIVES A FUCK? You really think you are scarry.... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Veterans, and those currently serving, you might want to add your own comment. Rallying the troops.... and here I thought you were doing something. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Don't worry, you can always try to befriend Jeanne/Amazon, I think she might give you a big 'ole hug for being a fake How is it I'm a fake? I served 1 term in the military; so what? Is that such a big deal? Millins have and I respect their service. Perhaps we need to examine your service or your attention to the service as you have never heard of a military term. >>>>>>>>>>>>.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>All I needed to hear. You think this country is a PIECE OF SHIT? Funny how you still take your full VA bennies from this PIECE OF SHIT country. Yep, I earned em. I also earned the right to think this country is a POS right now. I do think it will get better, as it did under Clinton if we get the neo-con garbage out. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>.I'm this close to being banned for PA's. That's because you can't control yourself. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>If I'm not mistaken even the hardcore libs would have a problem backing you on that statement. Of course, as we know the true Americans are the Republicans. >>>>>>>>>>>>>So, when you're at a sporting event you sit? I don't frequent them, so I have no set place....this matters how? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.Where's that thread about douchebags.. I would think u would know......

I say out;aw it, it only motivates day trading and that is what makes vital day trading. Speculators suck, that's behind a lot of the gas price hikes.

So... Obama being a senator has relevance to eating what you kill. Got it. Just sawyou run out for a couple days after making those laughable assertions....just wanted to give you a chance to clear them up. You going back to the thread...or....not.

Read before you respond. Never, anywhere, did I say make anyone pay the bulk. I said all should pay equally. I know that concept is beyond comprehension, but try just for a second. An equal percentage would still constitute the well-off paying more. It's still more fair. I await a valid argument for the "rich" paying a higher percentage. >>>>>>>>>>Read before you respond. Never, anywhere, did I say make anyone pay the bulk. You said I want the successful to pay the bulk: "The problem is that you want the successful to pay the bulk." Short memory? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I said all should pay equally. I know that concept is beyond comprehension, but try just for a second. How can all pay equally when the poor have little to nothing? Can you comprehend that little math equation? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.An equal percentage would still constitute the well-off paying more. It's still more fair. I await a valid argument for the "rich" paying a higher percentage. Do they? According to Warren Buffet his secretary pays a higher pecentage, and he claims he never uses tax accountants to shield his income.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Couldn't agree more. The problem is that you want the successful to pay the bulk. I know, let's make the poor pay the bulk; they have all that money laying around...... think b4 u write

Congratulations on making so much. However, I believe paying as we go, as opposed to borrowing from China to cover our debts, is the real reason for having taxes. Not to mention matching the world in defense spending and then deciding that's not enough, so spending another 150B/yr in Iraq.

Right, and then put you in a place of need and you squeel like a schoolgirl; that's the purpose of welfare. My dad is a great example of that, diehard Repugnican all his life, then get old and whine for social svs..... most neo-cons do.

Uh, those are young and attractive girls who will grow up to be attractive women....... not sure of the rub here Perhaps you are more into ....http://www.localseoguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/senator-larry-craig-31600.jpg.....the Larry Craig variety As well, I see you didn't disagree with me as to the Bush debt plan.......

Oh, cool, warped, ur back. Now go answer that thread where you shed your brilliance upon us and stated that Obama has been a US Senator for 2 years and that's it; no mention of him being one for 4 years this January or him being an Ill. Senator since 97 before that.

http://i18.ebayimg.com/02/i/000/d1/99/ca20_1.JPG

This didn't make me laugh. Blues, Dave Humans are pigs..... Correction. Humans EAT pigs. And abuse them, which is why they are pigs.

This didn't make me laugh. Blues, Dave Humans are pigs.....

So you're trying to paint the shades inbetween....braavo.

The former pose as the latter most of the time. Why would someone who hunts for food pose as someone who hunts for the thrill of killing? That doesn't make any sense! Every hunter I know usually has a large stash of elk or deer jerky or summer sausage. I wouldn't hunt myself (anyone who knows me knows I am far more likely to make a pet out of a deer than shoot it), but I have absolutely no problem with anyone else hunting an animal that is not endangered if they make sure that what is killed is eaten, and I have no problem eating what someone else shoots. Perhaps I got that backwards . So, I state here, the latter pose as the former. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>...and I have no problem eating what someone else shoots. I shot a skunk the other day.....

While Atheism does include those who believe there is no god, it also includes those who place no faith in god or find the concept of god to hold no meaning. If you do not actively believe in a god (whatever else you may or may not believe) you are an atheist. Agnostics may be atheist or theist. They may believe (or disbelieve) in god and still think the evidence in not known or unknowable. With that I'm a hard core extremist, fundamentalist Christian Atheist. You've convoluted rigid boundaries there. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Atheist a person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings. —Synonyms Atheist, agnostic, infidel, skeptic refer to persons not inclined toward religious belief or a particular form of religious belief. An atheist is one who denies the existence of a deity or of divine beings. An agnostic is one who believes it impossible to know anything about God or about the creation of the universe and refrains from commitment to any religious doctrine. Infidel means an unbeliever, especially a nonbeliever in Islam or Christianity. A skeptic doubts and is critical of all accepted doctrines and creeds. I'm more of a skeptic with that defintion / list of synnonyms. See. an atheist must deny the existence, not just who, "...place no faith in god or find the concept of god to hold no meaning."

The former pose as the latter most of the time.

Right, and I'm sorry, faith is as impressive as crossing my fingers, but I respect those who cross thier fingers when making large decisions, just don't want to follow their lead.

The truth, as evidence bears, is often boring since we can't dream up BS that makes us feel good.