Lucky...

Members
  • Content

    10,453
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by Lucky...

  1. The US gov places higher taxes on goods??? This assertion is ambiguous. Then how is it that wages have fallen, the rich richer, yet the unions are the ones forcing higher wages and company expenses? Your 'guess' just doesn't add up. It's a neat cliche you post here, but you would have to establish that unions have driven wages up causing some kind of catastrophic mess - you simply haven't done so at all, but esp w/o any supporting data/evidece. You would have to show how the unions drove wages up, putting businesses out of work, or something to that effect - and do so in mass scale, not one or two. Show what Obama has done in regard to uniuon strengthening and how it has played out. HINT: Cali was in big trouble beforre Obama took office; try to make a coherent argument. Provide evidence for your guess that Greece's problems are due to unionization. Now, if you can do that, which you can't, show how that is the problem of the world. Well, to support your problem, if the world adopted the oppressive labor practices that China did, perhaps the world could be as productive as China. Communism: The means of production is controlled by the gov Socialism: Means of production controlled by the people Capitalism: Means of production controlled by the market (market controlled by teh elite) SO what you're saying is that in countries where the means of production is controlled by the gov, they are more successful, yet you want smaller, less intrusive government. Sorry son, you can't have it all ways, either select a gov-run market or select one that is more independent and has unionization. As with most connies, you want it both ways, or should I say, shit on teh poor and give the rich everything. See how the ends of Communism and Capitalism reach around the back side and touch / share values? Look up UTILITARIANISM and you'll better understand how the US has COmmunist ideals at the will of the RW.
  2. Exactly, but as corpo-fasist America, we just can't help but to bail them out.
  3. Considering teh fabric of our nation is wrapped around corps, how is that funny? You're celebrating the demise of our country. Since we denounce socialism and embrace corporate fascism, we are at the whims of these corps and must bail them out as we rarely igonre them and let them bust, so thinking it's funny that they flip off any pres as if they're more empowered, which they are, is hate for American. Basically he realizes he can't stop it and the gov will have to bail them out, so why should he whine? He tried to act as tho he wanted to stop it and was villified.
  4. This is a corporate governance issue, not a federal governance issue. It needs to be addressed. Corporations happen at the state level. States should make appropriate changes to their law to stop this behavior. Empowering the stockholders to approve bonuses might be a start. A massive bonus for massive losses just seem wrong. A bonus that is a percentage of profits would be fine but to have compensation cut by a percentage of losses would be the proper incentive. Agreed, how is it that owners have less say than directors?
  5. Ok, lets get this out NOBODY should make more money in any job than the inflatable kallend. If they do, it is inflatably obscene Your posts have really gone 5th grade. I'm virtually to the point where I would just ignore them out of boredom.
  6. This is a corporate governance issue, not a federal governance issue. It needs to be addressed. Corporations happen at the state level. States should make appropriate changes to their law to stop this behavior. Yea, states rights nuts, just another example that states rights should be limited.
  7. What is the next level after bankruptcy? Seriously, I can only laugh lately ... On to the next company to extort all their cash.
  8. Nice full response. So, how is it to be RW and advocate for rich and greedy? At one piont do hit a point in your life where you wonder why the fuck you went that way?
  9. You would think a dude that is afraid of guns and gun owner would not make machine gun posts ! I own more guns than most, even so-called gun rights enthusiasts. You once again are w/o any understanding of what you state. try decaf... Try having a clue; I'm one of the biggest gun ownership proponesnts here.
  10. You would think a dude that is afraid of guns and gun owner would not make machine gun posts ! I own more guns than most, even so-called gun rights enthusiasts. You once again are w/o any understanding of what you state. Now you brag?? As far as knowing our understanding you and where you come from. That is very simple. Thank God you are in the minority in this country is all I can say
  11. You would think a dude that is afraid of guns and gun owner would not make machine gun posts ! I own more guns than most, even so-called gun rights enthusiasts. You once again are w/o any understanding of what you state.
  12. So is it, "corpman" or "corpsman?" I presented evidence of corpsman, here's evidence of corpman being used by a Navy site: http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=9015 SO WTF? If the US Navy can use it, teh pres can't? Did he misspeak or not? SO his policies have flipped the GDP huge time, slammed the market past 10k and now unemp has fallen to 9.7 and all you can do is hope for US failure and complain that he misspoke a word, even if he didn't? Gottta hurt seeing Obama look like such a buffoon It appears it is those who can't determine the correct spelling of "corpsman" or "corpman" to be the buffoons. I know you can, enlighten us. Didnt catch the spelling reason or just ignoring it? That makes no sense, ellaborate. Again, your point is not only semantic, but just plain errant. It appears the spelling and pronounciation of the word in question varies as I posted. Gonna keep runnin?
  13. So any real answer? GDP: http://www.bea.gov/...l/gdp/gdp_glance.htm Unemp: http://data.bls.gov/...eries_id=LNS14000000 Stock market: http://finance.yahoo.com/...=on;source=undefined 2-year chart So with all numbers looking good, how is it that Obama is failing? Because he didn't fix the Great Republican Recession in 2 weeks? You simply don't have the data to support your claim.
  14. Care to address your fuckup? Either is right it appears, the rub from the idiot RW media is that he made it two words and didn't make silent the "ps." http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2671639/obama_calls_navy_corpsman_corpse_man.html?cat=9 This just shows the desperation from the right. All 3 indicators are going positive, some way positive, so what can you say?
  15. So is it, "corpman" or "corpsman?" I presented evidence of corpsman, here's evidence of corpman being used by a Navy site: http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=9015 SO WTF? If the US Navy can use it, teh pres can't? Did he misspeak or not? SO his policies have flipped the GDP huge time, slammed the market past 10k and now unemp has fallen to 9.7 and all you can do is hope for US failure and complain that he misspoke a word, even if he didn't? Gottta hurt seeing Obama look like such a buffoon It appears it is those who can't determine the correct spelling of "corpsman" or "corpman" to be the buffoons. I know you can, enlighten us. So Obama spelled the word incorrectly? No... he pronounced it incorrectly. It appears there are 2 spellings of the word in use in the wild. Along with 2 pronounciations, which the purveyors of this thread don't have the guts to admit they fucked up when they brought up this petty, semantic point. Unless otherwise pointed out, their only argument is void.
  16. does anyone else feel that it is strange that the teaparty is all white? (like those bankers - odd) KInda like a clan rally out of dress.
  17. GDP: http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdp_glance.htm Unemp: http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?series_id=LNS14000000 Stock market: http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5EDJI#chart2:symbol=^dji;range=2y;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined 2-year chart So with all numbers looking good, how is it that Obama is failing? Because he didn't fix the Great Republican Recession in 2 weeks? You simply don't have the data to support your claim.
  18. I know, dude. American, corporate-fascist polices have made this country what it is: broke. Funny to see a RWer criticize a system that saved this country in the GD while the one you support has tanked it.
  19. http://www.alternet.org/news/145560/white_racial_resentment_bubbles_under_the_surface_of_the_tea_party_movement Oh My GOD! Someone criticized a black man! Harumph harumph harumph! Pffft. Whatever. No, someone criticized the president and used race as their basis. At least we use factors not respective to birth/origin.
  20. I agree, a senile ole white dude and a semi-pretty white ho running as Pres/vp is nuts. This somehow makes Nixon/Agnew look normal.
  21. How could she write that on one hand? And considering she had written her to-do list on her hand of: - Attend clan rally - Go hunt'n - Go fish'n - Attend clan rally
  22. So is it, "corpman" or "corpsman?" I presented evidence of corpsman, here's evidence of corpman being used by a Navy site: http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=9015 SO WTF? If the US Navy can use it, teh pres can't? Did he misspeak or not? SO his policies have flipped the GDP huge time, slammed the market past 10k and now unemp has fallen to 9.7 and all you can do is hope for US failure and complain that he misspoke a word, even if he didn't? Gottta hurt seeing Obama look like such a buffoon It appears it is those who can't determine the correct spelling of "corpsman" or "corpman" to be the buffoons. I know you can, enlighten us.
  23. Oh, what will history dig out of your hero's mess? The 5T debt? The oh so humane care for the people? Please enlighten us as to how GWB will be remembered as a god. And what has Obama done to earn a bad mark so far? I bet you said the same about Clinton early on, then he fixed your hero, Reagans, pile of shit. So much for your prognistications.