DanG

Members
  • Content

    6,580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by DanG

  1. Since the OP capitalized Eagles I assume he is refering to the Philadelphia Eagles, who mostly eat their opponent's shoe leather. Does shoe leather have mercury in it? - Dan G
  2. No, it doesn't. The insurgents are good at making bombs because bombs are very effective tools in insurgent warfare. It has nothing to do with their marksmanship training. The medical director's idea is akin to saying the US Navy is good at sailing ships because they don't receive formal marksmanship training. It makes no sense. If you would explain the thought picture instead of just posting snippets from other people, I might comprehend you better. - Dan G
  3. I don't know about Iraq, but in Afghanistan every male has the right to own an AK-47 and a full magazine of ammo. Russian 9mm pistols are also easy to come by. There is hardly what I would call heavy restriction on weapons. And the medical director's comment that insurgents get good at making bombs because they don't have formal marksmanship training is completely ridiculous. Take even a second to think about it and you'll realize it makes no sense. - Dan G
  4. Really? Because that's exactly what the essay you posted, and said you agree with, proposes. - Dan G
  5. FYI, the .ir domain indicates that your source is from Iran. - Dan G
  6. Who has ever, in your entire posting history on this site, ever told you that? Seriously. - Dan G
  7. Yeah, it's all just bikini models and Hawaii vacations. I don't work for NASA, but I do work for a NASA contractor. Right now I'm writing hundreds of pages of reports regarding the structural integrity of a part of the Orion spacecraft that you've never heard of. It's very sexy. - Dan G
  8. You're trying to imply that NASA employees don't do any work, and that's why they like it there. Is it possible that they like doing important scientific work, and get a sense of acomplishment that most people don't get from work? Nah, it must be because everyone is lazy and shitty. - Dan G
  9. Sorry, sunshine. Just call 'em like I see 'em. I think you and your peers kind of like being pissed off, it gives you something do to. BTW, I heard you were spending a lot of your time in charity work these days, especially regarding veterans. Thank you, sincerely. - Dan G
  10. That picture is truly astounding. Not in a good way. Obama isn't a socialist, nor a Kenyan. You're being spoon fed lies and eating them up like pancakes. There are plenty of things to complain about with the Obama Administration. It shows great ignorance to constantly focus on the make believe problems instead of the real ones. - Dan G
  11. Yeah, there was no acrimony during the Bush years. - Dan G
  12. Please show me where the government reported that a 0.2% change in unemployment should mean 600,000 new jobs. You made that number up, or got it from some pundit. It is wrong. - Dan G
  13. Your 600,000 number assumes that all 300 million Americans are in the job market. Kids, old people, retired people, disabled people, and students aren't looking for jobs. I understand your point that the unemployment numbers may not be the best representation of the real job picture, but you're throwing around numbers that are equally misleading. - Dan G
  14. Yep. I get benefits. Since you're so keen on generalizations, why do Republicans want to take benefits away from disabled veterans? - Dan G
  15. Yep. I get benefits. Since you're so keen on generalizations, why do Republicans want to take benefits away from disabled veterans? - Dan G
  16. Yep. I get benefits. Since you're so keen on generalizations, why do Republicans want to take benefits away from disabled veterans? - Dan G
  17. Yep. I get benefits. Since you're so keen on generalizations, why do Republicans want to take benefits away from disabled veterans? - Dan G
  18. Yep. I get benefits. Since you're so keen on generalizations, why do Republicans want to take benefits away from disabled veterans? - Dan G
  19. Yep. I get benefits. Since you're so keen on generalizations, why do Republicans want to take benefits away from disabled veterans? - Dan G
  20. Yep. I get benefits. Since you're so keen on generalizations, why do Republicans want to take benefits away from disabled veterans? - Dan G
  21. Yep. I get benefits. Since you're so keen on generalizations, why do Republicans want to take benefits away from disabled veterans? - Dan G
  22. Yep. I get benefits. Since you're so keen on generalizations, why do Republicans want to take benefits away from disabled veterans? - Dan G
  23. Yep. I get benefits. Since you're so keen on generalizations, why do Republicans want to take benefits away from disabled veterans? - Dan G