NCclimber
-
Content
4,456 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by NCclimber
-
Do you have anything more recent than a 12 year old report to back up that claim? Burglary isn't, though. And according to the 2006UCR, crime is on its way up again. A dodge and trying to put the onus on me. Nice try. How about a link that burglary isn't half of what is was in 1995.
-
I guess you're not interested in practicing the "Play the ball, not the player" that you preach. When dealing with someone who stuffs the ball up his shirt you kinda have to do both. In plain english, since you almost never actually state what your position is, what's the point in seriously debating you? For someone who regularly whines about other's behavior, your own isn't really much better.
-
I guess you're not interested in practicing the "Play the ball, not the player" that you preach. When dealing with someone who stuffs the ball up his shirt you kinda have to do both. In plain english, since you almost never actually state what your position is, what's the point in seriously debating you? You ask me questions.... I answer them... then you get all butt hurt. Go figure. Oh yeah - just because you make up lies about me, that doesn't make them true.
-
It's not really my problem if people get there panties in a wad when I draw attention to their bullshit ploys, now is it? When it comes to being deliberately obtuse, I can't hold a candle to you. BTW Do you own a gun?
-
Do you have anything more recent than a 12 year old report to back up that claim? I ask because violent crime is 1/2 of what it was 12 years ago.
-
Dr. John Kallend, What's your ecological footprint?
-
I guess you're not interested in practicing the "Play the ball, not the player" that you preach. Do you own a gun?
-
No one ever said he was "hysterical" Al Gore - now there's a bonafide hysteric.
-
Here you go. http://www.danielbbotkin.com/archives/category/global-warming-and-life I wish more people speaking on this issue made as much sense.
-
What have you been arguing about? Why? On a different note, here's an excerpt from one of his recent articles: Doesn't sound like siding with the GW hysterics out there, either.
-
Do you have any proof that life never existed on Mars?
-
If you say so. Oh. We're into mindreading now? DURRRR Asking to prove something doesn't exist? Do you have any proof that life never existed on Mars? BTW I have no issues with Daniel Bodkin. Just with how people "interpret" his words.
-
Do you really believe this simple-minded rationale? Or are you just seeing how many people you can reel in? When Nixon said on camera, speaking to the nation, "I am not a crook" what do you think he really meant? That he was a crook? When Clinton told the nation on TV "I did not have sex with that woman" was he admitting to having sex with her? They were both denying accusations against them. As a result they both showed they were willing to lie to the American people. What does this have to do with Michael Moore's deceptive practices?
-
You've asked the same question twice. I'm certain that if he wants to answer you he will. I'm just as certain that repeating the question multiple times in bold does nothing to make him want to. But it is quite amusing that one of the most vocal sparring partners of the gun rights posters is unwilling to answer the question.
-
Ellen DeGeneres Under Fire for Giving Away Dog
NCclimber replied to Gawain's topic in Speakers Corner
Like no one saw this coming. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8SBO9JO0&show_article=1 -
Do you really believe this simple-minded rationale? Or are you just seeing how many people you can reel in?
-
Does this mean you now agree that the article and/or website implicity acknowledges AGW, and you are now just nitpicking over the meaning of "significantly"? Nope. Would that be an absolute "nope", or just a kind-of, in-general "nope". Do you know the meaning of "implicit"? I answered your question. Sorry you seem to be having such difficulty with it. Perhaps you should work on how you word your questions.
-
This doesn't even qualify as wiggling. Scurrying seems more fitting. Reminds me of the whole Rosie O'Donnell/Tom Selleck dustup.
-
Does this mean you now agree that the article and/or website implicity acknowledges AGW, and you are now just nitpicking over the meaning of "significantly"? Nope.
-
If he thought it was insignificant why would he ak people to cut their emissions? I don't know. Why don't you write him. Let me know what he says.
-
You really shouldn't say things that make you look ignorant. http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2978171#2978171
-
Let's just take this back to where you jumped in, which was to counter my calling bullshit on: "The article implicitly acknowledges that manmade CO2 emissions are warming the planet significantly." Ignoring the fact that you completely sidestepped the fact that this was about the article (essentially moving the goal posts), where on his website does acknolwledge that manmade CO2 emissions are warming the planet significantly?
-
A mere two days ago you were preaching: "Play the ball, not the player."
-
No. Give me one reason why he would ask people to temper the effects of GW by reducing CO2 emissions if he did not think that manmade CO2 was a driver of GW. Hit me baby. Edit: Although I see where you've moved the goalposts. I guess the only way you'll accept that a person believes in anthropogenic global is if they say the exact words "Manmade CO2 emissions significantly warm the planet"? Wierd. This is rich. Do you really believe what you're saying?
-
Moving the goal posts, eh?