
Trent
Members-
Content
2,077 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by Trent
-
Don't even try. If a pro Israel website (or a pro-anything-that-people-are- against website) put up "2 + 2 = 4".... people would hint that some kind of bias on the site affects the ability of what is said to be true. Oh, hello again!
-
Sounds like a lot more than 1 country to me. In fact, sounds like enough for 1 country to feel really ganged up on. Guess you'd have to see how they usually represent themselves. Is it Venezuela who is anti-everything the US likes, including Israel? Is it Russia or China (veto countries) who are often seen on the side of Iran or Iraq or North Korea? Where is one place that a UN mandate is enforcing a real peace? Where are some places a lot more genocidal (Africa) where the UN is keeping some peace? When was the UN capable of enforcing a trade embargo on Iraq or accurately monitoring (and reporting) on the arming of Hezbollah? Maybe, just maybe, if Israel had ANY REASON whatsoever to trust the UN... they would. But we'll never know, will we? Oh, hello again!
-
That's prett eye-opening right there. It should make even those that constantly rail against Israel open their eyes a little bit. Just post a source to head off the first distractionary argument. Those figures really make me shake my head. Oh, hello again!
-
The interviews are available at www.youtube.com, just search for Ahmedinejad and you'll find it. I thought the interviews were nothing new. He said the same BS he's said before. It's the same lame attempts he makes to fool the gullible into thinking that he has some sort of reasonable side. It's a play to the anti-Bush crowd really. "See? He's not that bad!!" Gimme a break. It was a pointless interview from what I saw, except that you see how manipulative and arrogant he becomes when Wallace actually tries to NOT throw a softball lob to him. I thought the "so-called free world" part was hilarious in showing Wallace's ass kissing. Oh, hello again!
-
The comment about not hearing much about the initial reason the hostilities began almost sounded like some of the people that view that incident as an overplayed excuse or something that didn't happen at all. Apologies if you're not from that camp. Oh, hello again!
-
Well nobody except for the news on the radio and TV this morning. They were discussing negotiations for a swap of 13 hezbollah guys for the 2 Israeli soldiers. So... that theory's deflated I guess. Oh, hello again!
-
Yes, I can. And he'll love me for it! Oh, hello again!
-
There's "tricks" to everything. I've never REALLY seen any truly "blind" moves. There's a few seconds here and there where people lose sight, but not for a whole move. The really awesome people will just do facing moves with their eyes closed. Everything else is just BS.
-
Trying to get the judges opinions warmed up for nationals? Oh, hello again!
-
Didn't say man-launched... but portable. Certainly Katyushas are not SOLELY launched from the giant truck platforms. I guess if they are, then the pictures here are more "journalistic license." The single rocket setup looks like 2 guys could carry it and launch it from a pretty small area... like urban centers, rooftops, out windows, etc. http://www.cedarland.org/501.html Just scroll down a bit, and you'll see. Oh, hello again!
-
Of course I love and miss you too, but we only made 6 jumps to get to 16, and we flew it for a loooong time. Watchu got on that, sucka!?? Oh, hello again!
-
The Statue3 attachment looked about like the size of the crowd I remember seeing on TV. The first attachment looks like the statue is gone and crowd's dispersed. The third is a zoom that shows the side of the "event" that had less people on it. I don't see much deception really. Maybe some crazy right-wing photojournalist photoshopped a bunch more people into something you remember seeing. It never looked like thousands of people when it aired anyway. Oh, hello again!
-
Sayeth whom? "Hundreds of thousands"? Are you sure about that number? Does it come from reports like the "40 people died in the zionist bombing... ooops, I meant 1 person died."? Oh, hello again!
-
More harmful than the concussion wave from an artillery battery firing? In a built-up area... that would be pretty devastating as well. Firing rockets from empty buildings and rooftops is completely feasible. Didn't we already resolve that? Katyushas CAN be launched from man-mobile platforms. Hezbollah HAS these resources. I can go back and dig up more pics of Hezbollah with these launchers again if I have to. Even if Hezbollah only had the truck mounted launchers, do you think they'd be getting away with having them out in the fields all the time? I wonder where they go to hide? Certainly hiding hundreds of launchers out in open fields would be detrimental to their ability to launch hundreds into Israel daily. Oh, hello again!
-
Yes. In my observation, however, people seem to be more likely to question the Israeli reports and to beleive the Pallywood reports. Oh, hello again!
-
Maybe the difference isn't in the bullshit, but in those believing the bullshit? Seems like more people trust the "local journalists", who have been caught making shit up time and time again over the Israelis. You can see that just by the posts here in SC. Oh, hello again!
-
How so? Guns have to shoot at an angle, which kinda prevents them from being around any larger buildings. Open spaces like rooftops, empty warehouses with views of Israel? That's not to say that many don't come from the hills, but do you think they're stored there? Oh, hello again!
-
Where did I say that it hasn't? In fact... if you look at this thread or the Pallywood one... you'll see the opposite of what you assume I think. It certainly does seem that the muslim side is getting caught more often recently, though. Most of the press I've seen about Israel is how many operations they've had, how many soldiers they've lost, how they had to move from a town, how they've bombed yet another "innocent" victim, stuff like that. It seems they get shit on no matter what anyway so any attempts by them to say that they're actually dropping jell-o bombs and that it's actually good for the people would be met as skeptically as them saying that the ambulance they blew up was observed transporting weapons prior to its destruction. Meanwhile, our virtuous "other side" will continue to use the gullible to play the constant victim. Oh, hello again!
-
Yeah, just get the rabble all riled up, no matter what. Honesty be damned. Accusations and emotion are all that really matter. That is a really disturbing example. Oh, hello again!
-
Did you read the article? You should. You should also watch the Pallywood video and ask yourself just how much you're being manipulated. If the west was caught making as much shit up as the Palestinian side... EVERYTHING would be discounted as BS. Why do the Palestinians get a pass on that? Oh, hello again!
-
Maybe that poor innocent photographer has one of those new-fangled non-backlit monitors that are all the rage nowadays! Come on! There MUST be a perfectly good reason for his poor Photoshopping! Oh, hello again!
-
Nice excuse!! It could be myriad other things too. We can all play! Maybe he was shooting into the ground in the building and it was a dirt floor. Maybe, like was stated, there's a bullet trap in there or piles of dirt and rubble to shoot into. If you REALLY think that guy was shooting through brick realistically hoping to do some damage to the Israeli post, you must think that those folks are pretty freakin' dumb. Oh, hello again!
-
How about sticking to what you think about being manipulated by the Palestinians? Oh, hello again!
-
Maybe the full version will show you that people you don't like may not be the only ones with serious credibility problems. Who has more to gain by faking videos like this? Israel or Palestinians? http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3330818905742409257 Oh, hello again!
-
Then come back and we'll talk about what we both saw. So that should make it especially valuable to someone who always disagrees with "righties". Because it's right when the "pet cause" folks do it? Because the "victims" are really always the victims? There's plenty of reason to expose the "Pallywood" exploits, regardless of whether or not Stalin used propaganda in his day. Didn't you just criticize conservatives for bashing 60 minutes? The "production" actually made me wonder about whether or not that child may be dead. Funny thing about crying wolf... Oh, hello again!