Phil1111

This. If nothing happened during the demonstration, then the video can be erased. But if something does happen, we need the video. I have a dashcam in my car. It is on anytime the engine is running. I don't turn it on only when I anticipate having a traffic accident. I don't agree. Cops need bathroom breaks. Cops need breaks in which they can discuss office issues etc. Cops deal with situation which should not be recorded: Child abuse, people in very vulnerable situations etc. 100% on is not the answer. Same issue with aircraft cockpit voice recordings. Doesn't stop aircrew from discussing pretty much everything. 100% on. The preamble and distractions of participants may or may not be contributing factors to a accident or event. If nothing happens its nothing but data in a cloud that gets erased at some point.

thx. I guarantee that for the next four years comedians will use trump as a everlasting source of good material. He is a natural.

"TAKE note of January 11, 2017 everybody. Because there’s a chance that this was the day your mother/grandmother learnt what a golden shower was. The term #goldenshower was trending worldwide on Twitter and you can thank a bunch of unverified documents involving US President-elect Donald Trump for that. In fact, we may now have some clue as to why his hair is that particular hue ..." http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/twitter-is-drowning-in-a-goldenshower/news-story/17f297c7c86510cf986011201ab88d85 This is from an Australian news with a bit of a tabloid bent. What trump doesn't seem to realize when he throws discrediting statements to the four winds. Is that in the streets of the Arab world. For those who get their news from second or third hand sources. The US is a damaged brand. That everyone in the US, its media, security services, institutions and president. Are all liars, vulgarians, with zero social graces, or redeeming qualities. Everyone knows about the Hollywood video where trump boasts about grabbing female genitalia. Now this explains Russian superiority over trump and disgust for anything American.

I wondered for a second too. But sometimes rants have nothing to do with logic or supporting conjectures. As such, I immediately realized I don't really care.

Here is the 35 page document referenced in that article: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3259984-Trump-Intelligence-Allegations.html Its interesting but at the moment, that's all it is until there is some corroboration of the claims. Don't be like the rushMC's of the world who believe everything they are fed. Some of the report sounds credible, some sounds sensationalised - which makes me think it could easily be fake news. If thats the case, there is no need. Trump is doing enough to torpedo himself without making shit up. CNN isn't exactly reliable reporting but the information was only released two hours ago. Regardless, I'm sure Putin is smiling in his bed right now. I have it from reliable Russian sources, none less than Royreader8812 himself!. That Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, Hero of the Soviet Union,President of the Russian Federation,winner of the Confucius Peace Prize and TIME's Person of the Year. Has been smiling since Nov. 8.

http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2016/sep/12/donald-trump/trump-solely-blames-obama-doubling-debt/ and the other quote was July 2016. You do know the last budget was submitted Feb 2, 2015 for the 2016 year? Anyway back to the issue of debt. "Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget" finds :"Study: Trump trade plan would cost 4M U.S. jobs Thursday, 22 Sep 2016 | 10:14 AM ET | 04:19 The national debt would surge under a Donald Trump presidency, though not as much as originally thought, according to a new analysis. Trump's stated plans to stimulate the economy through the building of infrastructure, boosting military spending and making sharp tax cuts would increase the national IOU by $5.3 trillion, or roughly 26 times more than Hillary Clinton's" from "The CRFB is a bipartisan panel made of former policymakers and legislators looking to bring down the national debt and deficits. Some prominent members include former Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, former White House chief of staff Erskine Bowles and former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker. "

Actually I was being generous, factcheck.org says obama has more than doubled the debt. CNN says, " By January 2009, the United States had accumulated $10.6 trillion in debt. That's the net amount the country had borrowed from Washington through the Bush years. The gross national debt now stands at $19.7 trillion. That's an increase of $9.1 trillion — not quite a doubling, but pretty close." And that was three months ago. Show me your numbers and sources. "False Ribble Says President Barack Obama "built this $16 trillion debt." — Reid Ribble on Thursday, August 30th, 2012 in an interview President Obama 'built' nation's $16 trillion debt, GOP Rep. Reid Ribble says Ribble said Obama "built this $16 trillion debt." His spokeswoman said Ribble meant that the debt had reached that level because of Obama. But Ribble used the $16 trillion figure, not the roughly $5 trillion that the debt has increased under Obama. Moreover, the debt grew not only due to Obama’s actions, but those taken by present and past presidents and Congresses. We rate Ribble’s statement False. http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2012/sep/12/reid-ribble/president-obama-built-nations-16-trillion-debt-gop/ "Importantly, though, President Obama did sign many laws worsening this debt situation. Among the most significant are the 2009 stimulus, extending the 2001/2003 tax cuts temporarily in 2010 and making most of them permanent in 2012, the 2015 permanent "doc fix," and the tax extenders/omnibus bill at the end of 2015. President Obama also signed several pieces of legislation to reduce projected debt, most significantly the Budget Control Act. But importantly, these laws were written not by the president but by Congress. It is Congress that passes tax and spending legislation. There is little the president can do to impact the debt, positively or negatively, without a bill passed by Congress. Conversly there is little Congress can do without the president's signature or a veto-proof supermajority. Further, during most of Obama's term to date, control of Congress was split between a Democratic Senate and a Republican House. Both branches share blame, both for legislation that increased the debt and for failing to enact legislation that would curb the debt growth that was already projected to occur from the growth of entitlement programs and insufficient revenues. *** By a few metrics, debt has doubled during the Obama presidency. The blame though is not only on him because some of the debt increase over the past eight years was already expected to occur, and Congress had to approve bills that increased the debt. Interestingly, debt held by the public would double again by 2024 under Trump's proposed plans – so while he is right about what's happened under President Obama's watch, his plan will make the problem worse. Our Rating: It's Complicated" http://crfb.org/blogs/has-president-obama-doubled-national-debt Total debt or debt/GDP is an equal measure of burden to put upon future generations to repay. Perhaps politicians pay should be tied to balanced budgets. If projected revenues are unmatched by expenses pensions would have to be held back as well. I think a profits repatriation bill is a good idea. But it should not be a blank check for corporate America.

These factors ^^^^^^ should tell US citizens the most about the direction to achieve results. Canada, Britain, USA...Satisfaction Ratings http://www.gallup.com/poll/8056/healthcare-system-ratings-us-great-britain-canada.aspx 164 page report covering developed counties which has ALL the answers on how to model a cost effective outcome. Canada for example is not the most efficient, not the best and need not be the model. But its citizens visit physicians twice a often as US citizens. With overall costs per person 1/2 of that of the US. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/files/publications/fund-report/2015/jan/1802_mossialos_intl_profiles_2014_v7.pdf I think that industry lobbyists are the greatest obstacle to reform and reduction of costs.

http://onwardstate.com/2016/03/01/penn-state-to-end-coal-shipments-this-month-switch-to-natural-gas/

Clear, human words. That's exactly how I see it, and many millions on this side of the pont, too. No need to talk around on political level - that man is no president, he's playing that role to confirm himself. His centre of the world is only one thing: DJT himself. A morbid liar. As soon as Putin enters the WH through his own revolving door, the world surely will change a bit .... That's why I love our Angie: She's highly educated, she's honest and spotless clean. I kind of like your Angie as well. She is level headed, principled and surrounds herself with council who seldom panders to the extremes.

I think you misunderstood the intention of my post. Some here have no intention of an objective understanding of the issues, facts and arguments posted. For which posts and links like yours seem useless. If the perceptive peephole of someone is 1/4", a fire hose of information will still have limited effect on the fire... Or none.

Its always important to understand the source of information and the qualifications of that source. Before the interwebs and breitbart news. People got detailed scientific knowledge from books and scientific journals. Scientific American magazine comes to mind. In order to get a book published or a study published in a magazine like Scientific American. You had to have a degree from a recognized university and peer support. Today anyone with a keyboard and access to the internet can publish. Set up websites and fill them with anything. With a basis in fact or with non-facts skillfully designed to mislead. Mislead those with already preconceived ideologies. Or mislead those who can't or lack the skills of inquiring minds to vet their sources of information. Unfortunately the biased, ignorant and those with minds disabled. By a lack of analytical or inquisitiveness of thought. Are everywhere, even here.

This is the paper that started the FSB and Putin to where they are today, sort of. A Russian general published a treatise on asymmetric warfare. It was published because he(and other Russian General leadership) recognized the limitations of Russian military and economic power.Vis-a-vis the US and NATO. It also represents a response to the decline in Russian leadership in the former Warsaw pact. The Russian empire and former Soviet republics subsequent membership in NATO. Together with the response that the FSB, Russian military leadership and the kleptocracy of the Russian state under Putin. Have to the west. First is an analysis published in the US army Military Review. "Military Review is… An established Army forum to promote original thought and debate on topics related to the art and science of land warfare. Provides publishing opportunity to original thinkers drawn from a wide variety of eclectic backgrounds without regard to rank or official position." http://usacac.army.mil/CAC2/MilitaryReview/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20160228_art009.pdf and another with additional analysis: The author here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Galeotti analysis here: https://inmoscowsshadows.wordpress.com/2014/07/06/the-gerasimov-doctrine-and-russian-non-linear-war/

OK naked use of a plasma cutter requires elaboration. What kind of cutter, how thick was the steel, what were you building and what drugs led to naked use of a plasma cutter?

I think he conquered this when he was 15-16. Although its difficult to completly conceal it. "So what about blushing? What is its relation to the truth? Well, blushing indicates a failed attempt to hide the truth." http://www.guidetopsychology.com/honesty.htm Thats why he uses the orange paint on his face. Its to conceal blushing.

A friend of mine broke his neck after diving from shore into a farm dugout. The water was muddy, shallow and he hit the bottom. He was about 27 when it happened and afterwards only had very limited mobility of one arm. Eventually as a result of the other injuries he ended up with a colostomy bag. He died about 10 years later, mostly as a result of the accident. Previously he was a excellent water and snow skier and very active. The new go-pro era continues to kill and injure the foolish. In numbers unprecedented before the interwebs and hero self imaging.

I remember the days, pre 9/11, show your ticket and pick your seat. Baggage! no limits. Decent meal-free! Drinks, well the passengers did all the drinking and they were all free.

"China to plow $361 billion into renewable fuel by 2020... China will plow 2.5 trillion yuan ($361 billion) into renewable power generation by 2020, the country's energy agency said on Thursday, as the world's largest energy market continues to shift away from dirty coal power towards cleaner fuels. ... The spending comes as the cost of building large-scale solar plants has dropped by as much as 40 percent since 2010. China became the world's top solar generator last year. ... The NEA's job creation forecast differs from the NDRC's in December that said it expected an additional 3 million jobs" http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-energy-renewables-idUSKBN14P06P "The hard-eyed view along the Tug Fork River in West Virginia coal country is that President-elect Donald Trump has something to prove: that he'll help bring back Appalachian mining, as he promised time and again on the campaign trail. Nobody thinks he can revive it entirely — not economists, not ex-miners, not even those recently called back to work.... most voters saw Trump as the only choice for president. He vowed to undo looming federal rules and said President Barack Obama had been "ridiculous" to the industry. Trump told miners in Charleston: "We're going to take care of years of horrible abuse. I guarantee it."... That skepticism is supported by industry analysts, who say any recovery won't be centered in the eastern coalfields of Kentucky and West Virginia and will never bring U.S. coal back to what it once was. Last year, the nation had about 66,000 coal mining jobs — the lowest since the U.S. Energy Information Administration began counting in 1978. That's down 20,000 since a high point in 2008, and preliminary data show 10,000 more lost this year." http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-trump-jobs-coal-country-biz-20161121-story.html

Here is the revelation: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-intercepts-capture-senior-russian-officials-celebrating-trump-win/2017/01/05/d7099406-d355-11e6-9cb0-54ab630851e8_story.html?utm_term=.b93f60bc7b82

Good answer. Now ask the same question here: http://www.basejumper.com/ If you still don't like the answers go to: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=base+accidents Sometimes you don't know what you don't know: http://static.squarespace.com/static/510d75a3e4b072208fa0710b/t/52f8164ae4b07ae93f1ad94d/1391990346306/Canopy%20Drills.pdf https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/1103046/brit-tells-of-year-inside-hellish-dubai-jail-lags-ripped-man-apart-like-wolves/ You can kill yourself out of a AC too without traveling to exotic locations.

Ah! the US without regulations. trump learning from Putin about how to limit regulations and oversight. http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/12/world/russia-red-river-siberia/

I can't remember ever seeing Foster Brooks before. That's the best drunk acting I've ever seen. But i guess he was famous for that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foster_Brooks

trump doesn't like renewable energy because: "His company the Trump Organisation previously lost two legal bids in the Scottish courts after ministers approved proposals for an 11-turbine scheme which Mr Trump said would spoil the view from his course. He took his case to the Supreme Court, where justices unanimously dismissed his appeal." http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-38069605 Clearly this investor-weak-loser. Knows nothing about renewables.That's trump speak for a billionaire who has a net worth of 73 billion vr. trumps 3 billion. Who gave away to the Gates charity over $50 billion alone and $20 billion to other charities. I speak of Warren Buffet. His integrated oil,gas,energy company has 2020 installed wind turbines. https://www.berkshirehathawayenergyco.com/our-businesses/midamerican-energy-company and has now ordered 1000 more. http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/blog/earth_to_power/2016/06/vestas-scores-massive-order-for-warren-buffett.html Buffet will have among the most wind turbines when this is complete. trumps charity giving? To himself, to his vanity. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-donald-trump-retooled-his-charity-to-spend-other-peoples-money/2016/09/10/da8cce64-75df-11e6-8149-b8d05321db62_story.html?utm_term=.f84af3a4dd9c Then of course there is this Republican oil billionaire. "T. Boone Pickens's office is a shrine to a life of Texas power and wealth: framed Western landscapes, a portrait of his platinum-haired wife, photos signed by Republican presidents... Listening to all of your environmental ideas, it sounds like you're the Al Gore of Texas Republicans. Don't connect me to Al Gore! A lot of what he says just doesn't make sense. Texans know I'm environmentally directed in some ways. But I'm realistic about what's going on. Industry people are comfortable with me. Gore talks about getting rid of the combustion engine. I don't talk about that.... You recently announced plans to build the world's largest wind farm, in the panhandle. Is that about money or the environment? Money! First thing, it's about money. Of course, I'm also a good environmentalist. I can pass the saliva test. But I'm not going to go do a 4,000-megawatt wind farm for the environment first and money second. I'd rather go give money someplace else. You're talking about $10 billion... What kind of return do you expect? A minimum of 15%. It'll probably be closer to 25%." https://www.fastcompany.com/849689/texas-oil-tycoon-tackles-renewable-energy The bold highlights are for Brent's attention!

The worst part to me for seeing these things is that it likely wasn't the first time they have flown while under the influence, it's just that this time they pushed it and got caught. I also find it interesting that in many airline interviews there's the question: "Your captain arrives and smells of alcohol or appears (s)he may be under the influence, what do you do as a junior first officer?" "There are two FAR’s that are important to know when it comes to drinking and flying. Most pilots are aware of the “8 hour” rule, that is, 8 hours from bottle to throttle, although many airlines have a more stringent 12 hour time limit. Most pilots do not know of the 0.04% FAR, which prohibits flying an aircraft with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.04% or higher." http://www.airspacedoc.com/alcohol-the-pilot-and-the-faa/ Those questions are no different from the "have you ever broken a FAR?, What would you do if the Captain was breaking a FAR? What is most surprising about this is how drunk that pilot was. The reports have indicated a BAC of .28 at about the time he was arrested. Presumably he slept before the flight. That means close to a full 26 ounces of hard liquor were likely consumed by him. http://www.selfcounseling.com/help/alcohol/hourstozerobac.html

Which is a complete coincidence. Cheap coal has run out, and the next cheapest thing happens to be cleaner than coal was. Oh hey everyone, regulation is useless because just this once we would have eventually stumbled onto a better alternative anyway. Doesn't everyone feel stupid for forcing coal plants to run filters on their smokestacks for all those years when we'd have stopped burning it by now anyway? What harm could another 50 years of unfettered powerplant exhaust have done anyway? Actually there is still century's worth of cheap coal supplies. It more a matter that fracking and new drilling technologies has increased the supply of gas many-fold. currently there is insufficient pipelines and gas liquefaction port facilities to bring North American gas to world markets. "Five U.S. LNG export projects are under construction, including ones in Freeport and Corpus Christi, but many others are awaiting both regulatory approval and corporate decisions on whether to invest billions of dollars during a market downturn." http://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/energy/article/A-second-wave-of-Texas-LNG-export-projects-could-8327466.php "Under a year ago, U.S. LNG exports to Europe seemed unfeasible. Today they are a reality. Demand for gas is expected to grow in the next decade. Prices, if kept around $5 million Btu, allow for US exports and competition with Russia. Europe could gain greatly. An increase in LNG imports could provide a cushion for the next five years, while Europe, in its rush to guarantee its security, invests in pipelines, storage capacity, LNG terminals, and integrating the markets. Europe has a lot to gain from the unfolding of current events. A Trump presidency can push European institutions to begin thinking of an independent future, while the Russian threat can bring all European countries together to diversify supplies of gas and achieve energy security." https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/the-importance-of-us-lng-exports-to-europe/ These export scenarios would allow the US and EU to squeeze Russia and Gazprom down to the $4/million BTU(for long term contracts) and under price for EU gas imports. In addition remove Russian threats and meddling in the use of gas exports to Europe.