regulator

We will find out in the next two hours or so if he plans on bypassing congress. If that happens this country could be turned upside down overnight.

If the public doesnt stand up for their rights this could be happening here if we let a bunch of legislators determine whats best for people.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/15/ore-sheriff-says-wont-enforce-new-gun-laws/ State officials in Oregon and Texas are vowing to fight back against any attempt by the federal government to impose new gun control laws. The warnings come as President Obama prepares to unveil a "comprehensive" plan to address gun violence, based on the recommendations from the Vice President Biden-led task force. The plan is expected to include a call for legislation to ban assault weapons as well as a variety of executive actions. But in Oregon, Linn County Sheriff Tim Mueller wrote a letter to Biden Monday saying his department will not enforce any new gun laws it considers unconstitutional. Mueller said politicians are "attempting to exploit the deaths of innocent victims" by supporting laws that would harm law-abiding Americans. The sheriff said he took an oath to support the Constitution, and laws preventing citizens from owning certain semi-automatic firearms and ammunition magazines would violate their rights. "We are Americans," Mueller wrote. "We must not allow, nor shall we tolerate, the actions of criminals, no matter how heinous the crimes, to prompt politicians to enact laws that will infringe upon the liberties of responsible citizens who have broken no laws." Meanwhile, 1200 WOAI reports that in Texas, Republican state Rep. Steve Toth plans to introduce a bill that would make it illegal to enforce in the state any federal laws restricting semi-automatic firearms or the size of gun magazines. Toth told 1200 WOAI that the bill would also call for felony charges to be brought against federal officials who attempt to enforce any such rules. "If a federal official comes into the state of Texas to enforce the federal executive order, that person is subject to criminal prosecution," Toth told 1200 WOAI. The warnings could be the first wave of state officials pushing back against Congress and the White House as they take up new gun control measures in the wake of the Connecticut mass shooting. Obama and others say new rules to at least limit the size of high-capacity magazines are overdue and could save lives. Mueller, though, told The Associated Press in a phone interview from Albany, Ore., that he felt compelled to make his views known because sheriffs have not had much of a say on the vice president's anti-gun violence task force. Mueller said his constituents have been repeatedly asking his deputies about what will happen if new gun restrictions are adopted. "We're restricted and prohibited from enforcing all types of federal laws, including immigration laws," he said Tuesday. "It would be unreasonable for anyone to think that I would enforce a federal firearms law." Mueller said some other sheriffs expressed support for his stance, but he does not know of any who have pledged to take similar action in regard to potential gun laws. Linn County is largely rural and politically conservative. Fewer than 40 percent of its registered voters supported President Barack Obama in November. Mueller said most households in the county have guns. Though the letter might add fuel to an already hot topic, Mueller said he wishes people could have a civilized discussion about the issue, rather than resort to threats and name-calling. He said he doesn't think the vice president is a bad person; he just doesn't like the path he appears to be on regarding gun laws. "We don't have to be jerks to each other over it," he said. "If old Joe wants to come out here to Linn County, we'd have a good conversation."

This video has nothing to do with the obamas. Take that to the SC. In the meantime if you actually watched the video you might find it pretty damn funny.

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/83027113/ This has got to be the best nfl video I've seen in months.

Agreed. Do you want him back yet?

This was by far the best video I have seen to battle against the bullshit liberal tactics of Piers Morgan.

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/83014609/ Piers Morgan is a fucking twat.

and I'm over here trying to warm the climate...one chipote burrito at a time.

http://www.aol.com/video/vodka-saves-pups-life/517642642/?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000058?test=latestnews If your dog has ingested antifreeze its a possibility straight vodka could help the dog recover...albeit hangovers are probable.

So am I the only person that has their own action figure and comic book named after them? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhunter_(comics)#Clone_of_Paul_Kirk http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2012/06/grumpy-old-fan-the-resurrection-of-paul-kirk/

I hope nobody ever murders your kids with a "legal" firearm. I hope nobody murders your kid with any instrument. In general I hope we can live in a place where there is no evil. Yet I refuse to bend over and take it if I have the opportunity to defend myself and my family.

dont let the door hit your ass on the way out.

Are we secretly talking about liberals?

I did not say the gun caused the crime, I said the PRESENCE of the gun caused the crime. In other words it was the bait that attracted the burglars. If all you people have to defend yourselves is word games then I take it that my argument has ore validity. the bait wouldnt be available for common public knowledge if it werent for the newspaper outing law abiding citizens. What part of this are you having difficulty understanding? Obviously all of it because you refuse to pull your head out of the sand and continue to say completely absurd illogical statements.

I can agree with that assesment completely. The only reason this case was so applicable to the article was that it appeared someone attempted to pry open the gun safe and extract the contents. Thankfully they were unsuccessful.

I do. I have mine in my safety deposit box. And BTW I scored expert in all of my range qualifications with the worst score being 38/40.

Let's get this straight: Your point is that the thieves used the list in the article to identify a house with a gun. Why? The only logical reason is that they wanted to steal a gun. In that case, the gun was directly responsible for the break-in. Therefore, in this case, the presence of the gun caused a crime to be committed. ----------------------------------------------------- You can say whatever it is that makes you feel better at night. Blame it on the gun if you want to. But I don't lose sleep at night wondering if my guns are going to rise up and mount a rebellion against me in my sleep. Your logic is so flawed you and your liberal bretheren are grasping at straws and trying to assess blame in the wrong places. But then shifting responsibility is all I read and have yet to hear anything logical to eliminate mass shootings. We can't blame the actual criminals that perpetrate the crimes because we have to protect their civil liberties. Can't blame the mental health system because its so fucked up nobody knows where to begin. I've been hearing arguments from supposedly the most persuasive of liberal speakers and yet all I hear is deflection and wanting to blame an inantimate object. Go back to the drawing board because your sad arguments are boring me to death. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdUSpiC8MsU

Because the link you posted has absolutely nothing to do with this particular case. Stop being so predictable. You're boring me to death.

Wake me up when you say something that adds value to this conversation.

Guess you should have read the article before coming out with that stupid statement. SHE WAS'NT HOME.

Guess you didnt see this one. He used an AK (but probably as SKS) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbLFVx7KGbc

Which was the case here. The lady was gone. The gun was locked in a safe...perps tried to pry it open and were unsuccessful...just like kallend trying to sway people to his side of the gun control argument.

IMO the feeling of pride you can feel by helping someone in this situation will be outweighed by the possibilities of getting you involved in a situation that isnt in your best interests.

As a person who has had dependancy issues in the past its all up to the person. If they want help then they can find a way out. If you watch intervention on A&E you would see lots of people who went back to their ways after rehab. But it can be done.