SkyDekker

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    21,691

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96

  • Feedback

    0%

  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. SkyDekker
    I have a question with regards to this whole creationism and evolution thing. Let's assume for a second Adam and Eve were caucasion. Who had the first black baby? How about the first Asian baby? Did God just decide that a new race was needed and all of a sudden a caucasian mother and father had an Asian or black baby? Or is there a black adam and eve and an asian adam and eve etc etc?
  2. SkyDekker
    Check your history books (and current affairs). There was/is another nation involved. They stood beside you in all those wars and stand beside you in the war against those responsible for 9/11. Thankfully they were smart enough to realize the war in Iraq was/is completely bogus....
  3. SkyDekker
    Well said. I truly doubt that his reasoning with regards to vetoing this bill has anything to do wth money....other than maybe money flowing to him.
  4. SkyDekker
    Off course it is, just ask the boys in Boston.
  5. SkyDekker
    I wonder if the voices in his head told him to do it?
  6. SkyDekker
    Bush just vetoed the bill. His first veto ever. I don't think there is any doubt that the religious right has immense power over your current president.
  7. SkyDekker
    On what Art is...but we do know that Art is Abuse by definition....really it is quite simple
  8. SkyDekker
    Art is abuse by definition.
  9. SkyDekker
    I pick C
  10. SkyDekker
    I agree, but it not being art also doesn't make it abuse. I wouldn't allow my children to be photographed this way. But that still doesn't make it abuse either or art.
  11. SkyDekker
    At least he didn't kiss her belly
  12. SkyDekker
    The money paid for the taking of the pictures will go toward the college fund of the child. One could argue that an emotional outburst never to be remembered can be used in the greater good of the child to allow it to go to college... Yes, I realize it is stretching it a bit...but like has been said before. I see no difference between this and young child actors....etc
  13. SkyDekker
    The assumption being made is that people who vote now generally make an informed decision and those additionally attracted by a lottory would not make an informed decision at all. I am not sure if either assumption is correct at all.
  14. SkyDekker
    What I think really has no baring on British law. For instance. I don't see anything wrong with having a couple of grams of marijuana in my pocket. I don't think that your marijuana use has significantly declined since your War on Drugs. Do you see me starting a thread every 10 days about the drug laws in the US and how useless they are? I may participate in a discussion and give my opinion on stated goals and how they are being achieved. See any difference?
  15. SkyDekker
    As shown in the link above, that does not preclude the possibility of an AD.
  16. SkyDekker
    if a stranger came to you and said: "excuse me officer but did you holster your gun correctly?" You will respond how?
  17. SkyDekker
    Then obviously you didn't read the link I posted. It was a sherrif's holster and he was performing along department policy when the chain of events that led to the AD started....
  18. SkyDekker
    Leave a kid alone without a bowl of spaghetti and it will eventually cry.....I fail to see the difference.
  19. SkyDekker
    This incident happened in the past. None of us discussing it have the ability to go back and discus it with the detective. Unless you are privy to a special texan cop time machine......
  20. SkyDekker
    http://www.thegunzone.com/mos/ad.html That tells me not to trust a gun in a holster. Now I know you will say that there external factors (raid jacket) at play. How do I know that is not the case when the cop is standing at Starbucks and the gun in his holster is pointing at me..... An AD with a holstered gun isn't something that has never happened.....so it really isn't as laughable as you make it out to be....but then you just like going after kallend....
  21. SkyDekker
    It's not like it hasn't happened before. As a gun nut and a cop (or soon to be) I figured you would have known that....
  22. SkyDekker
    See, I asked you to go to the original post and reply.....I went back and quoted it for you: See, unformed was displaying trollish behaviour and I fed him. My apologies if you have a hard time understanding that.....
  23. SkyDekker
    If there is a law against it in another country...who are you to say that he did nothing wrong? Spitting out your gum on the sidewalk in Singapore is against the law. You can and will get punushed for it. I do't see anything wrong with it, certainly not to the extent they do in Singapore. Yet, when you live there you have to abide by those laws....even if I think there is nothing wrong with it. If I really object to it I could ban produvts from Singapore and not vists there. Your "crusade" against English gun laws is laughable. I could understand if you wanted to debate the reasoning behind the laws. But you have this habit of making up a reason and then trying to show how your made up reason isn't valid......
  24. SkyDekker
    And you care because?
  25. SkyDekker
    You can refuse to do your job if you think it is unsafe. Do you think taht is the same as refusing to do your job because you are striking, or the sqme as just not showing up and refusing to do your job that way? All three are very different. Yes you can label them all together in refusing to do your job and call them the same. That would be just as stupid as labeling soldiers in Iraq with murderers in the US cause both are killing people.