SkyDekker

Members
  • Content

    21,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96
  • Feedback

    0%
  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. No, we won't. If his GPA is high, then clearly they are false and the university increased his marks. They knew this kenyan muslim without a birth certificate was going to be president of the US. The liberal media and puppet masters had already decided so.
  2. Pretty clear it is a statement regarding the question, not an answer to the question. Question is also stupid enough that even somebody without combat experience can answer it.
  3. Wanting and not having an objection to something are not the same thing.
  4. We just went from training to battle situations. Apples and oranges are not thesame. If people jumped with 2 AADs and 2 reserves for fear of losing one in their next parachute allotment, you might have something of a point.
  5. He had significant mental issues. Significant enough to have been hospitalized in a closed mental facilities for more than a week. He was known to be suicidal and was known to have violent tendencies. I don't want to blame the object at all. I want to know why a person with known mental issues and known suicidal tendencies was allowed to own and operate the object. I don't have the answer to mental illness. I do believe that allowing mental patient access to firearms is not the right thing to do.
  6. he highlighted US vs Miller as: Hence I asked if the ruling also explained what would be appropriate.
  7. Like I said. Self preservation in stead of the greater good. Everybody wants cuts, nobody wants cuts that affect them. (On point (4), if you have to waste munition to keep the same level, could you not do with a cut? Hence, wouldn't you be better off not to waste the ammo, and get less next year, since you already have too much of it anyways?)
  8. Because it would be the right thing to do. Specially if after you had a chance to do the right thing you go on a website and tell everybody they should do the right thing.
  9. Does it highlight what they consider to be appropriate?
  10. FAA has them in the same category, take it up with them. I asked a question, he gave an answer. You are making no sense.
  11. We already know that, try and keep up. So after that, most sane people would like to find out why he had legal access to guns.
  12. Sounds like thereis enough confusion about whether the order is lawful or not. Enough for somebody so concerned about cutting waste to take a stand on the issue. However, you took the easy way out and didn't even try to take a stand. Self preservation in stead of thinking about the greater good. Brings us back to what exactly the problem is. Nobody wants to take action when it affects them.
  13. That's the thing. They didn't try to remove them from a suicidal loonie. The main question is why they didn't.
  14. Fuck me, like talking to a wall.... In your first scenario, the one that is supposed to be me. Are expenditures curtailed? NO I said both need to happen. This time I highlighted it, just in case you missed it the previous 10 times or so. If a usefull skill was learned, it wouldn't be overly wastefull. Did you communicate to your superiors that the acquired skill could have been attained more efficiently? If nobody ever does, how do you expect anything to change?
  15. Do you think US citizens should be allowed to own nuclear weapons? It's a silly question I know, but it also shows that most people are in agreement with restrictions on "miltary-type weapon". The rest is just arguing over where that restriction should be. Personally I think the restriction should be on weapons that could affect countries outside the US without direct aim. Nuclear and chemical out, anything else should be allowed.
  16. Correct Ok, if you say so. I wouldn't consider a powered parachute a plane, but whatever blows your hair back. You and Normiss should get together and argue if firearms = guns.
  17. Then there you have it DaVinci. case now closed.
  18. I am trying to reconcile your two statements. the one you use against interlocks, and then the one you use in favour of windshield wipers. They appear to be at odds with eachother. Your answer: you want interlocks. You want to try again?
  19. They are considered to be in the same category as powered parachutes. Would you consider a powered parachute the same as a plane?
  20. I didn't say remove, I said harder to have access to.
  21. In post #135 of this thread you state:
  22. You had a choice between using your time on the range usefull, or to "fuck around"; your post displays the decision you made. Sure. My point all along has been that both need to happen. Changing the order doesn't change that fact. (more to the point, since americans and politicians will never be able to agree on which expenditures to scrap, taxes will have to rise even more. In plain english, if you sit around waiting for expenditures to be lowered, you (as a country) are fucked.)
  23. I see that giving you the benefit of the doubt was misplaced then
  24. Well Mr DaVinci, I am sure many are happy to see you have been an active part of the wastefull spending of American tax dollars. In very many words you said: Do as I say, but not as I do. Interestingly enough, that is exactly the problem the US is facing. There should be a law requiring a balanced budget, including a required portion of outstanding debt. Then taxes need to be raised and expenditures lowered to meet the requirements of that law.
  25. It was his point with me giving him the benefit of the doubt