SkyDekker

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    21,691

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96

  • Feedback

    0%

  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. SkyDekker
    If you left your gun in your front yard overnight and somebody took it to rob a corner store, you do not think you should bare any responsibility?
  2. SkyDekker
    Can't be much of a country club if the houses around it are only $400,000. Average home in Toronto now tops $1,000,000. Homes backing onto private golf courses start at around $3,000,000 if you would like a fixer-upper.
  3. SkyDekker
    Just goes to show that having guns easily obtainable might be an issue. In countries where obtaining guns is harder, fewer mass shootings take place.
  4. SkyDekker
    Yawn............ If there wasn't more to it, and the officer got pissed off and acted that way, he should be out of a job. BUT, you or I have no idea what led up to this. I've been in enough messed up situations to withhold judgment unless I have ALL information. In your judgement, at what point in the video was the situation de-escalated enough to turn your back on the subject?
  5. SkyDekker
    Yes It took a gun to stop a nut I thought guns were inanimate objects who didn't do anything by themselves?
  6. SkyDekker
    I see a title about supposed "secret White House visits", with an article which then goes on to explain these vists were logged and weren't secret. But now I am supposed to use this article as "evidence" that Stewart was/is an Obama mouthpiece/puppet? From what I have seen from Stewart is he takes on both sides. If you believe he takes issue with one side more than the other, than there are other possible reasons than Stewart being biased. Amazing though how a comedy show has more effect than anything else.
  7. SkyDekker
    In what you post it clearly states he has "attacked" Obama as well. Wouldn't that prove Fox News wrong? Did you read all of wat you posted/linked to, or did you pull a rushmc?
  8. SkyDekker
    Yes, though will be harder to do, since many more people will be able to "afford" to run for President. I agree with Sanders in the point that an oligarchy is a problem, and the US is most certainly heading in that direction, if not already there.
  9. SkyDekker
    Trump isn't in an presidential election right now. He is trying to be elected by the party to be allowed to run in the presidential campaign.
  10. SkyDekker
    This is such a stupid argument. Every law out there gets broken, that isn't a reason not to have laws. Stupid is as stupid does I know what you are, but what am I.
  11. SkyDekker

    Hitchbot

    SkyDekker replied to mpohl's topic in Speakers Corner

    If it wasn't for Europeans, you would be sleeping in a tent, sticking feathers in your hair.
  12. SkyDekker
    This is such a stupid argument. Every law out there gets broken, that isn't a reason not to have laws.
  13. SkyDekker
    I am pretty sure the Donald wouldn't be able to distinguish a Columbian from a Mexican anyways.
  14. SkyDekker
    That's it. I am calling a Trump vs. Clinton race with Trump winning. Probably Trump/Cruz...cause he sounds sort of Latin and yet may not be a rapist.
  15. SkyDekker
    There is a fix. There just isn't an easy or palatable fix.
  16. SkyDekker
    Right next to the rule that says one person shouldn't post with two seperate accounts Regulator. You have proof he has two accounts? You have proof there is no rule for snitching? I just re read the forum rules, and there is no requirement to tattle anywhere in them.
  17. SkyDekker
    Rush, when you read that sentence does it make sense to you?
  18. SkyDekker
    Right next to the rule that says one person shouldn't post with two seperate accounts Regulator. You have proof he has two accounts? You have proof there is no rule for snitching?
  19. SkyDekker
    You still haven't shown how PP is making a profit from the "selling of body parts". The fact that in one year $85 million in excess revenue was recorded, doesn't mean that they made a profit off "selling baby parts". Further, since a NP has relatively tight restrictions on how this revenue has to be allocated, it is a good thing for them to have excess revenue. If PP kept running a defecit, they would likely come to the government asking for more money. Would you prefer that? Let's see where the goal posts of outrage get moved to now.
  20. SkyDekker
    That still doesn't mean that the exess revenue came from the "selling of body parts". Plus, a not for profit can have revenues in excess of expenses. It would seem you do not have a very strong understanding of this subject matter and are just outraged based on an emotional reaction and your dislike of abortions. I know I know No one knows as much a (you think) you do Funny how a NFP needs money when they are operating with 85 million of revenue but I realize NO ONE is a smart ah (you think) you are Don't have to be very smart to realize your grasp on the subject matter is limited and your outrage is purely driven by emotion.
  21. SkyDekker
    That still doesn't mean that the exess revenue came from the "selling of body parts". Plus, a not for profit can have revenues in excess of expenses. It would seem you do not have a very strong understanding of this subject matter and are just outraged based on an emotional reaction and your dislike of abortions.
  22. SkyDekker
    You are wrong on all 4 counts Prove it. Start with the profit they are making on "selling baby parts". What is the cost of these "baby parts" and what is the revenue they get from them? See the post above If PP is making 85 million of income over expenses, why would they have to sell anything? The gov gives them millions a year You can honestly say they keep money seperate??? Wanna buy a bridge? That wasn't the question. Show some evidence that they are selling organs at a profit.
  23. SkyDekker
    Right next to the rule that says one person shouldn't post with two seperate accounts Regulator.
  24. SkyDekker
    You are wrong on all 4 counts Prove it. Start with the profit they are making on "selling baby parts". What is the cost of these "baby parts" and what is the revenue they get from them?
  25. SkyDekker
    To kill some to save some you mean I could share your outrage if Planned Parenthood was the decision maker with regards to the abortion, but that isn't the case.