SkyDekker

The HOOHA act is no joke. Republicans are serious hardworking politicians.

I expect him to be as serious as Republican lawmakers in the US

Yeah totally: SCOTT SIMON, HOST: There's fresh scrutiny on Hunter Biden, the president's son, as he is under investigation. Part of that investigation appears to center on emails that showed up on a notorious laptop that was publicized before the 2020 election and then dismissed by much of the news media. Many of these emails have now been authenticated. NPR's David Folkenflik joins us now. David, thanks so much for being with us. DAVID FOLKENFLIK, BYLINE: Pleasure. SIMON: And what have we learned so far? FOLKENFLIK: We've learned a bunch more detail about Hunter Biden's vision to help a Ukrainian natural gas company called Burisma handle bad press in the U.S. and some other ramifications here although he didn't register as a lobbyist. We also learned about a Chinese energy company presumably with links to the Chinese communist government that made Hunter Biden seven figures in a short amount of time. To be clear, Hunter Biden has not been charged with any wrongdoing on this. He's said in the past that he's done stupid things but nothing illegal. SIMON: How did that information surface? FOLKENFLIK: Mostly through new reporting. You got to start with revelations in a book last fall by Politico's Ben Schreckinger and more recently in articles in The New York Times and The Washington Post. Much of these reports appear to center on materials related to the federal investigation of Hunter Biden. And there are a lot of witnesses and a lot of lawyers who have been asked about some of those Hunter Biden emails and correspondence and documents between him and some of his associates. SIMON: The New York Post broke this story just weeks before the 2020 election. Remind us of what ensued then. FOLKENFLIK: So The New York Post presented this story as a bombshell, and it said the emails were a smoking gun showing effectively Hunter Biden's corruption and suggesting much the same about candidate Joe Biden. Yet, its scoops were based on emails that could not at the time be independently authenticated, on a laptop that had not been positively identified as belonging to Hunter Biden, which was said to be abandoned at a repair shop. The laptop was provided, it's worth remembering, by President Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, to The New York Post. That's a tabloid owned by Rupert Murdoch, a political ally of Donald Trump. And I think it's also worth noting, Murdoch's Wall Street Journal and Fox News had reporters who had the same material. They passed on the story concerned about how authentic it might be. SIMON: Hmm. Are conservative critics of the president correct, though, in saying that in retrospect, the media was just too deferential to the Bidens? FOLKENFLIK: Maybe. I do think you have to understand the context of the moment. Think of what happened in 2016. You had the Russian involvement in the leaking of hacked emails from Hillary Clinton and the Democrats, and that caused incredible havoc during the election season. And think, too, a bit later of the so-called Steele dossier that attracted a ton of press coverage. It was posted in full by BuzzFeed News, and it turned out that contained a lot of misinformation not about Hillary Clinton and Democrats, but about the conduct of Donald Trump. SIMON: Hmm. Does that let off the media too easily? You wrote at the time that the mainstream press was right to be wary of the reporting at The New York Post. FOLKENFLIK: And I still think so. I don't think it lets them off too easily. I do think, though, there are two important points I want to make here. First, let's acknowledge social media's role. A number of platforms tamped down on sharing of the Post's story. In the case of Twitter, not only did they try to block sharing of it, they suspended The New York Post's actual Twitter account for sharing its own article. That was a wild overreach, and even Twitter had to acknowledge that. And then there was this cohort of paid pundits - 50 former national security officials, many of them appearing frequently in mainstream media outlets - who came together for a statement saying that this surfacing of the laptop bore all the hallmarks of a Russian misinformation campaign. And they pointed to the Russia's hacking of emails back in 2016, and their claims were not sufficiently and rigorously enough tested and questioned. I will go back to what I wrote at the time. None of the criticism from conservatives to do this seeming expose on Hunter Biden should force reporters to accept The New York Post's claims as true without additional reporting and additional verification. SIMON: And there are now Republicans and conservatives who say what we do know now, in their mind, demonstrates corruption by a sitting president. FOLKENFLIK: You know, from the evidence we have now - and that's important to note, the timing - President Joe Biden's actions have not been shown to be corrupt. What has been shown is a seeming tolerance for close family members - Hunter Biden, the president's brother - who are willing to trade on the family name in a way that seems, if not corrupt, untoward. And there is now more heft to a storyline that we already knew a lot about and yet remains one we're still pursuing. SIMON: NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik, thanks so much. FOLKENFLIK: You bet. https://www.npr.org/2022/04/09/1091859822/more-details-emerge-in-federal-investigation-into-hunter-biden

Sure and both the snippets and the rest of the article imply a lot of correlations, but don't provide any facts around causation. If you think it does, please provide snippets that contains facts establishing how American at one point trusted NPR and how that trust has been lost directly caused by actions NPS has taken.

Why are you triggered when asked about institutional bias when you post an article positing about an "unspoken consensus"? Why are you so fragile that when I post that I trolling, you are accusing me of calling you names? Do I think there is some bias within NPR, yes I do. Have you posted any facts, no you haven't.

Why do you have a preoccupation with trolling?

Your "family" has a tradition of sucking foreskin off penises of boys under 18....not sure you really get to take the moral high ground.

I seem to remember a war being fought because people didn't like longstanding tradition.

He is complaining about institutional bias, something you don't think exists. Oops, forgot, you don't have consistency in principles.

The US is an incredible example of how spending can lead to outstanding results! For instance the US spends about $840,000,000,000 annually on their military and their leaders are so incredibly advanced, they proudly post pictures of their acquired expertise!

I mean that is why Brent won't vote for Trump, he is a lefty like Pol Pot.

You are just jealous you can't pay for gas.

Well, if it wasn't for taxes Truth Social would be performing better.

How could I be triggered if you think too much is never enough?

If you think about it, you have men, you have women, and you have religion. If you look at it, you have more than the men, you have more than the women. You have such power.

oh lol, I thought you guys had money. Sorry.

So you were trolling. Got it. I don't know what you meant, considering you'll say anything to get a reaction.

Staunch Conservatives generally don't want progress, so I am not surprised that even back then they supported this.

None of that is in your youtube video. Also you earlier said that trans-women are women. Do you have a problem with being unable to not lie?

So you triggered two tax events while you are at the absolute height of your tax bracket to shield future tax obligations when you will most likely be in a lower tax bracket because you are afraid of what Democrats may do in the future. I mean you must have had some numbers and scenarios run to see how this would be financially beneficial. I would love to know what the assumptions were to make this make sense?

Why would you think that?

Regardless of motivation and consequence, it shows that people at the highest level of government thought there might be potential legal issues. Why else provide a pardon if a president couldn't have done anything illegal to begin with.

Which is why Ford sacrificed his election to give him a pardon.

US is incapable of solvin’ even the sollest smallest problem. The simplest of problems, we can no longer solve. We can’t do anything. We are an institute in a powerful death penalty. They want you to say what they want you, what they want to have you say. And we’re not gonna let that happen. You’re going to say as you want and you’re going to believe, and you’re going to believe in God. You’re gonna believe in God because God is here and God is watching. But, If you think about it, you have men, you have women, and you have religion. If you look at it, you have more than the men, you have more than the women. You have such power.

Insurance also wasn't part of your MBA, was it. Did you seek any advice, preferably from a fee based advisor, or did you concoct this brilliant scheme all by yourself?