SkyDekker

Members
  • Content

    21,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96
  • Feedback

    0%
  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. Anybody willing to look at this situation objectively has to come to that same conclusion. This is a huge national security issue for the US. You have a president who is bleeding money and who is going to have to renew $400 million worth of debt that he has personally guaranteed. This is the exact scenario why companies doe credit checks. This is why intelligence agencies do credit checks. Do people really think Trump under any other circumstance would even be able to get a security clearance based on this? Daddy gave him $400 million and he blew it. Hollywood gave him hundreds of millions and he blew it. Now the American tax-payer is giving him money while proclaiming how smart he is.....Basically you're his daddy.....
  2. Maybe. You seem very scared of strong, capable women.
  3. The election was 4 years ago.
  4. This is Trump’s biggest opportunity to show how the NYT is fake news. All he has to do is release his tax returns and show what they are reporting is false.
  5. Looks like your boys didn’t really show up. What happened?
  6. Hard to believe that in 2020 developed countries are still politically and judicially being shaped by whether or not a woman should be allowed to make a decision regarding their own body. Of course all while loudly proclaiming how backwards islamic countries are......
  7. lol Yes because clearly people would be terrified of upsetting him.
  8. Fair enough, wrong wording on my end. But I think you know what I was alluding to.
  9. There sort of is. Back to the legislative branch.
  10. Actually. The article is more about getting Republican controlled states to assign electors not necessarily guided by popular vote. This paragraph sums it up: We are accustomed to choosing electors by popular vote, but nothing in the Constitution says it has to be that way. Article II provides that each state shall appoint electors “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.” Since the late 19th century, every state has ceded the decision to its voters. Even so, the Supreme Court affirmed in Bush v. Gore that a state “can take back the power to appoint electors.” How and when a state might do so has not been tested for well over a century.
  11. If anybody wants to read something scary...... https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/11/what-if-trump-refuses-concede/616424/
  12. Yeah but the video is really good, why can't you just say it is really good......
  13. Now what if 5 other already agree. And those 6 combined were placed while the administrations where in place with a minority of the popular vote.
  14. So your argument is that because politicians flip they have a clear mandate because the population must have flipped as well?
  15. Yes, they voted against that, but now supposedly agree and provide a mandate.....
  16. Agreed. But that is because there was an absolute unwillingness to cooperate to get your society healthcare. You would think that if your political system can push through or withhold SC justices on purely political basis, they can work together to provide decent health care for your society.
  17. Yes, wanting to get your society healthcare and join the rest of the developed world is indeed the same......
  18. I did, I quoted your prediction when I made my prediction. It is right there, in one post. Just scroll up and look at it. Really isn't very difficult.
  19. No. I have already stated that I believe Republicans and their followers to stand for nothing, other than the pursuit of power.
  20. Look at comment from you I quoted when I made my prediction.
  21. He has been in the media saying how he knows more than the generals...