warpedskydiver

That's how i judge good film though, whether it be gratuitous gory violence or the psychological kind, if it grosses you out or makes you feel wierd then surely it's had its desired cinemagraphic effect? (is cinemagraphic a word? I've had four after work beers and i can't be sure ) hmmmm I guess so but I am not sure, yes I think that was the directors intent however those of us who are kind of analytical may not react in that way. I have never been bothered by gore and violence except for to get really pissed off when it is real, and perpetrated on an innocent. I must be damaged goods huh?

is a 26 year difference bad? and no not in DOG YEARS

I honestly don't see how anyone can have a reaction to a movie that was violent, yet the violence was not REAL Saving Private Ryan may be an exclusion, as the violence was not real, but was actually based on fact...and that may have really bothered some Veterans I guess a rape on film although not real, can trigger reactions from an actual rape victim as well.

For anyone to think that ANY type of communications have not been monitored for the last 30 years is simply ridiculous. Want to make a bet that even encryption software that purports to be uncrackable is easily ready by the NSA and others? Has anyone here not heard of Echelon and Carnivore? geez even at a lower level there is CALEA these things have been out in the open for quite a while, but yet have been ignored unless they can be attributed to the EVIL BUSH administration in the media.

2-40rd mags clipped together

gee could the reason they appear similar be because all three religions: Judaism, Christiantity, and Islam are actually from the same stem religion?

Find 5 hotties to keep on a "friends" basis I will translate that for you: that means five women screwing you on a regular basis without bitching or asking for your money

We DO just have the continent of America! Actually we have two they are called north and south remarkably

Damn too bad you don't want to be free

You just summed it up. Plus, if he's a true Texan then he probably has a healthy dose of southern hospitality too. I love the whole southern gentleman thing. Yep I just love when southern women say "Y'all can fuck me" hehehehe

Renee if he was a dog he would be sniffing your behind...he wants to date you...DOH!

OMFG not again...read above you man Theres alot of conspiracy theorists and stuctural engineers in this thread.... Seems like quite a few intelligent people can be way wrong at times

bullets will kill when not fired in enough vertical angle. fire a bullet 45 degrees and all you get is small artillery...(MAX RANGE) it will most likely kill at that angle I saw the mythbusters episode and they accounted for the vert angle.Quote dead is not equal to dead eh?

Park Service Bans Climbing of Utah Arches Wednesday, May 10, 2006 3:26 PM EDT The Associated Press By PAUL FOY SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Climber Dean Potter scaled Delicate Arch, the soaring desert symbol of southern Utah. Now, the National Park Service wants to make sure he doesn't do it again. Arches National Park on Tuesday announced a tightening of its rules on climbing after Potter announced with photographs and video that he made an unassisted climb of the arch just after daybreak Sunday. Arches Park Superintendent Laura Joss said she reported Potter's climb to the Interior Department's chief lawyers, and park rangers were investigating whether Potter did any damage to the arch. Joss said she was rewriting the rules to ban climbing of any named arches or natural bridges in the park. The new rules took effect Tuesday and were posted prominently on the park's Web site, www.nps.gov/arch. Potter said he will not violate them. Potter said he didn't know of any other climber going to the top, but didn't take credit for a first ascent. "I would think somebody a hundred years ago figured out a way to get up, maybe with ladders and rope," said Potter, a 34-year-old professional climber. "It's only 70 feet tall." Michael Fatali, an artist from Springdale, Utah, was convicted in 2002 of setting two fires under the arch at night and banned for two years from Arches and Canyonlands national parks. Fatali lit the fires in aluminum baking pans but the heat from the fires scorched the sandstone under the arch. To settle the misdemeanor case, Fatali paid $10,900 in restitution and completed 150 hours of community service. Quote While I think this guy didn't really do anything wrong, I can certainly see why they would ban climbing named arches. I wonder how long it will take for some POS to go there and drive protection into the rock

I tried the sleeping in a naked woman option... Boy was she angry

Where the heck is Lawrocket and Bluto?

and doing so is a Federal Offense thats just sick...in order for me to leave my neighborhood to go hunting I am legally required to have to jump my fence and go through the easement and across the barbed wire fence through a car dealership in order to avoid going within 100 feet of a school instead of getting in my car and driving up from the end of my dead end street.

that was pretty cool

http://www.brl.ntt.co.jp/people/hara/fly.swf

No this is a FEDERAL LAW that's really bad it was passed in 1998

Never heard of them.

what is wrong with my tattoo?

Wow. How unusual. You've started a thread without saying how much someone needs to be shot. The Day is not over yet don't worry

Don't you have someone else to bother? Or did they all run themselves off a cliff like lemmings in order to escape your verbal wrath?