warpedskydiver

Gee I wonder who has been asking to have me banned permanently? Hmmmm...

Gonna threaten to kill him? Gonna complain about me preemptively? Sheesh I wish people would quit making veiled statements and just say what they mean. Narci why don't you just not respond to anything I say ok?

Oh ok, well you can just give up your wallet and then be shot if that is what you prefer. And here I thought that if people were pointing a gun at me were planning to kill me. I forgot they were only asking for donations for a orphanage.

I hope you are insinuating that I am not a citizen of this country or that I don't deserve to live here... If that is the case please speak up.

Hey I am white, my family came here over 225years ago, if someone doesn't like the fact that I might be proud of my heritage they can go fuck themselves.

Btw I didn't say so before but I really hope your knee heals well and very soon

Hey alot of them are against it, that doesn't mean they will keep their word. I knew someone that was a male stripper, you would be amazed how many women are sucking and fucking at bacherlorette parties. Men...eh......who doesn't know they are dogs.

BTW the bulls antlers were so amazing that he was photgraphed by many many people, therefore identifying that particular elk was almost no effort.

That monster elk was shot on a game ranch and the photo was circulated and then the hunters were busted for trying to claim a record kill. I am kinda tired but I can get you the whole story tommorrow. Those two were scam artists.

Lieberman Warns Democrats: I May Join GOP NewsMax.com Wires Friday, Feb. 23, 2007 Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut fired a shot across the bow of the Senate's Democratic majority, warning them he may bolt the party and join the GOP if Congress votes to withhold funding for the war in Iraq. The move would give Republicans control of the Senate, since Democrats hold the majority by one vote. Lieberman, who calls himself an "independent Democrat," has been among the strongest supporters of the war on terror and President Bush's plan for a troop surge in Iraq. "I have no desire to change parties," Lieberman said in an interview published Thursday on politico.com. "If that ever happens, it is because I feel the majority of Democrats have gone in a direction that I don't feel comfortable with." Lieberman cited the upcoming showdown over new funding for the war could be a deciding factor that would lure him to the GOP. Several Democrats, led by Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy, have been agitating for a funding cut-off. "I hope we don't get to that point," he said. "That's about all I will say on it today. That would hurt." Lieberman's remarks echo earlier sentiments he expressed in an interview with Jeffrey Goldberg in the February edition of The New Yorker. The Senator told Goldberg that his allegiance to the Democratic Party is based in part on sentiment and should not be considered eternal. "A lot of Democrats are essentially pacifists and somewhat isolationists," he said, adding that he had problems with Sen. Ted Kennedy's proposal to deny President Bush funding for the troop surge, and with his fellow Connecticut Sen. Christopher Dodd's suggestion that Congress might cap the number of U.S. troops in Iraq. Asked if he would switch parties if Democrats cut off funding for the war, Lieberman responded: "That would be stunning to me. And very hurtful. And I'd be deeply affected by it. Let's put it that way." Though Lieberman has been loyal to his party, Senate Democrats are not reciprocating. The New Yorker reported that his Democratic colleagues "tend to indulge him, unless they are speaking to reporters off the record." Lieberman is well aware that only five Senate Democrats campaigned for him in last year's general election, which he won as an independent over Democratic and Republican rivals, largely because GOP voters crossed party lines to support him. Lieberman has already made clear that he will not necessarily support the next Democratic nominee for the White House. One Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Dodd, even campaigned for Lieberman's Democratic opponent Ned Lamont in the 2006 Senate race. Sen. Hillary Clinton, the party's frontrunner for 2008, actively fundraised for Lamont. Lieberman once described Dodd as his "best friend" in the Senate, but when asked by Goldberg if that was still the case, Lieberman said only: "I have so many good friends in the Senate. John McCain is a very good friend." In fact, most of Lieberman's closest friends in the Senate of late are Republicans, according to the New Yorker article. Lieberman acknowledges that at times he feels isolated, as a liberal on social policy and a conservative on defense. He told Goldberg that he was reading "America Alone" by conservative Mark Steyn, who argues that Europe is being overwhelmed culturally and demographically by Islam. "The thing I quote most from it is the power of demographics, in Europe particularly," Lieberman said. "But the other part is a kind of confirmation of what I know and what I've read elsewhere, which is that Islamist extremism has an ideology, and it's expansionist . . . We Americans will have ultimate responsibility for stopping this expansionism." Those feelings are related to Lieberman's reasons for standing by the President on Iraq, he said. "Why do I trust President Bush in spite of the mistakes that were made, consequential mistakes? Because having watched him, having talked to him, I believe that he understands the life-and-death struggle we are in with the most deadly and unconventional enemy, Islamic extremism. "And he has shown himself, notwithstanding all these mistakes, willing to go forward with what he believes is right for the security of the country, regardless of what it has done to his popularity."

they swell up, makes it still feel tight...or at least that's what I read

It goes to the skimask statement

Foreigners have unsteady legs on french soil...just ask any frenchmen.

Bill maybe there are SEVEN TIMES MORE CITIZENS THAN ILLEGALS! actually the ratio should be far higher according to your assertion

Thanks Mike, thats must have been in their "takin the piss" courses

Wasn't that a pickup from the guys he had just killed?

Did you realize he is only president until 2009?

Yeak try and catch a RPG with one stinkin tooth

Sad huh? mind your own business, get woken to a loud noise, try protecting your family, get shot by a cop on your property for no reason at all. I think this cop has some 'splainin to do. He needs to be fired at the very least, sure mistakes happen but covering something up by lying and you will be seeing a federal judge, from the defendants table.

This guy was a child during WWII I think Korea and Vietnam.

Steve it isn't nice to play with foreign troops food...you know that.

Yep...

I bet he doesn't owe beer.

Jim Brown OneNewsNow.com February 22, 2007 Illegal aliens are killing more Americans than the Iraq war, says a new report from Family Security Matters that estimates some 2,158 murders are committed every year by illegal aliens in the U.S. The group says that number is more than 15 percent of all the murders reported by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the U.S. and about three times the representation of illegal aliens in the general population. Mike Cutler, a former senior special agent with the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service (the former INS), is a fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies and an advisor to Family Security Matters (FSM). He says the high number of Americans being killed by illegal aliens is just part of the collateral damage that comes with tolerating illegal immigration. "The military actually called for the BORTAC team, ... the elite unit of the Border Patrol, to be detailed to Iraq to help to secure the Iraqi border," Cutler notes. "Now, if our military can understand that Iraq's security depends in measure on the ability to protect its border against insurgents and terrorists, then why isn't our country similarly protecting our own borders?" he asks. "We are not five and a half years, nearly, after 9/11, and yet our borders remain open," the Center for Immigration Studies fellow observes. "We have National Guardsmen assigned on the border, but it turns out they are unarmed," he points out. "Their rules of engagement are very simple: if armed intruders head your way, run in the other direction." This situation would "almost be comical if it wasn't so tragic," Cutler asserts. "If our borders are wide open, this means that drugs, criminals, and terrorists are entering our country just as easily as the dishwashers," he says. The report from FSM estimates that the 267,000 illegal aliens currently incarcerated in the nation are responsible for nearly 1,300,000 crimes, ranging from drug arrests to rape and murder. Such statistics, Cutler contends, debunk the claim that illegal immigration is a victimless crime. "Then we even have another problem," he adds, "and that's the Visa Waiver Program." The federal government's Visa Waiver Program enables nationals of certain countries to travel to the United States for tourism or business for stays of 90 days or less without obtaining a visa. According to the U.S. State Department website, the waiver program was established in 1986 with the objective of "eliminating unnecessary barriers to travel," stimulating America's tourism industry, and allowing the government to focus consular resources in other areas. Cutler says the U.S. retains the Visa Waiver Program because the nation's travel, tourism, and hospitality industries want America's borders wide open. In other words, the former INS official contends, the nation's security is being compromised in the name of trade.

I haven't suggested destroying any guns. However, following your analogy, maybe we should register guns (like planes) inspect them at regular intervals (like planes) put a tax on bullets (like aviation fuel is taxed) licence gun owners (like pilots) make gun owners pass a written, oral and practical test (like pilots) report all changes of ownership (like planes). Yes, maybe you had a good idea there, but it will never fly with the NRA. Ok but show me where in the constitution where it states we all have the right to fly or own a plane.