Channman

Wow, I am sure those idiots at CIA and FBI never thought of that.... So is your point then...Nobody knows who did it?

Well I'm no expert in these matters...but If a Hacker is able to gain access to the DNC and or RNC emails...or for that matter any email address with any criminal / political intent, is it not possible they are also able to use Malware that leaves a Russian Fingerprint? Doing so would help direct any investigation away from them and or slow down the process. Chicago Tribune has this article which provides additional insight between the Divisions between the CIA and FBI over motives. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-russian-election-tampering-cia-fbi-20161210-story.html

POLITICO had the following...it gives a different perspective if anyone is interested in a different perspective that might be outside the one they currently are holding onto. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/john-bolton-russia-hack-a-false-flag-232490

Was and still might be purchasing the EFD1000 Pro, but at a bit over $9,000.00 not including the cost of install would require me to consider selling one of two of my Para-motors. Which by the way I have one for sell...Flat Top Ninja with the Vittorazi Moster 185 motor and comes with the Air Trike, Luggage Bag, Sky Reserve, Side Bag, Strobes, Altimeter and a Sky CIMA K2 Wing, all at the low, low price of $8,000.00. This is a deal of a life time if you know someone who loves to fly. I have Roughly 14K in it. Thanks for the links. I posting the video as it give a little idea of what the Flat Top Paramotor Can Do...and the ladies are easy to the eyes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcR6xQ0Ohw8

G5...very nice, was not aware of it. Will give it serious consideration.

Looking to add a Dynon EFIS-D10A to the panel on my PA-24, Piper Comanche 180, which I need to confirm is covered under the STC. Has anyone gone through the FAA Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) process to install a Dynon in their aircraft and if so what was your experience in regards to the process. My hope is the FAA will within a few short years allow additional experimental aircraft avionics to be approved for Part 91 single engine piston aircraft. Many of the avionics used in experimental aircraft such as RV-6, 8, 10's are far more reliable than TSO avionics that are a hell of a lot more expensive and do not perform as well or hold up. https://www.google.com/search?q=Dynon+D10A+photo&biw=1368&bih=880&tbm=isch&imgil=nOA8Yk6NgcRuyM%253A%253Bv45IEGwBds3sUM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.dynonavionics.com%25252Fefis-d10a.php&source=iu&pf=m&fir=nOA8Yk6NgcRuyM%253A%252Cv45IEGwBds3sUM%252C_&usg=__atvrc9Uums_MPEMieEqAkmC9buE%3D&dpr=0.95&ved=0ahUKEwjpn5KvxeXQAhVG-mMKHZdoCEQQyjcIMw&ei=xtBJWOmkDcb0jwOX0aGgBA#imgrc=nOA8Yk6NgcRuyM%3A

One thing to see it on the news, but to see it up close like this video and having a sense of the fear on getting out safely make it more personal. Hopefully the rain heading that way will be helpful in getting this fire under control.

Hey, be careful..."$ trumps values" could be considered hate speech in this forum. But what about that video??

Does anyone have any idea the amount of money required to put one of these wings together. Not sure what one of those engines cost but my guess would be north of $8,000. each. Great Video

You might know the following but posting it for educational value. "In order to appreciate the reasons for the Electoral College, it is essential to understand its historical context and the problem that the Founding Fathers were trying to solve. They faced the difficult question of how to elect a president in a nation that: •was composed of thirteen large and small States jealous of their own rights and powers and suspicious of any central national government •contained only 4,000,000 people spread up and down a thousand miles of Atlantic seaboard barely connected by transportation or communication (so that national campaigns were impractical even if they had been thought desirable) •believed, under the influence of such British political thinkers as Henry St. John Bolingbroke, that political parties were mischievous if not downright evil, and •felt that gentlemen should not campaign for public office (The saying was "The office should seek the man, the man should not seek the office."). How, then, to choose a president without political parties, without national campaigns, and without upsetting the carefully designed balance between the presidency and the Congress on one hand and between the States and the federal government on the other?" http://uselectionatlas.org/INFORMATION/INFORMATION/electcollege_history.php

Michael Moore agrees with...a BIG FUCK YOU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKeYbEOSqYc

What an ASS HAT troll...move along

I said this bitch was coming. look at the electoral map. the system works exactly as designed and it works well. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal" The system designed to enshrine inequality certainly worked as designed. It was designed to ensure that some citizens are more equal than others when selecting the president. nope It was designed to ensure one small part of the country can not dictate to the rest of the country Get over it You lost 'Tyranny of the majority' and 'growth of factions' was the mindset behind enacting the Elector system for President. With that in mind, if the new Republican Senate wants to be Statesmen instead of politicians, they need to reenact the 60 vote rule that was altered by the Democratic Senate to stack the courts with their judges. Yeah, like that would ever happen. Probably not in my lifetime. Harry Reed set the standard...don't see why Republicans should do any different. What goes around, comes around.

I am just happy he doesn't represent me. I'm glad he doesn't represent you as well...God knows we don't need another pansy from outside interjecting themselves into American politics.

FREEDOM IS BACK IN STYLE!!!

It appears you need to find another talking point...DNC will contact you shortly with additional lies to spread. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html

Please show me one post I have made this year that I have supported Trump. I have made less than 10 posts on the Dork Zone in the entire 2016 year (most of the 10 are from today ... LOL). I have stayed away because I am so sick of the bullshit politics and so sick of the idiots who come here day after day to protect their beloved politicians. I might come back tonight after I finish throwing up after watching Part II in disgust at how corrupt the US government is. But rest assured I will be self-censoring myself from the Dork Zone in the coming days. I have better things to do with my time than to waste it arguing over corrupt criminal political parties than use violence to further their agendas. Not surprised you'd throw up watching the work of a self-confessed criminal (O'Keefe) who has been outed for doctoring evidence. And don't let the door hit you on the butt on your way out. You lefties crack me up...O'Keefe is a criminal...O'Keefe didn't record these guys admitting to criminal acts...this video was edited by the Russians. Yea, that's right the Russians...and that Putin fella, they the ones that done it. Everyone has know for many years that the Democratic party is unable to win elections without committing fraud...now that we have documented proof in emails and video the only thing you got is the videos where doctored. Liberalisms is truly a mental disorder.

WOW...I suppose some people will need to wear their Baby Panties so they don't wet themselves during the debate. I think one of the ways Trump could lose is if Clinton collapses on the stage and stops breathing and Trump rushes over to give her month to month. The out cry from the LEFT will be damning...look at that, he is sexually assaulting her, "sexist pig"!!...looked like he was giving her the tongue. If Clinton begins having a coughing fit and can't stop for several minutes...Lester Holt will be taken to the Wood Shed for not breaking and going to a commercial. Lester will be dealt with much like Matt Lauer who made a potential career suicide blunder by asking Hillary a real question...Damn that BASTARD. Lester's only hope is to say..."but the rule said No Brakes, was I suppose to brake the rules for her???" YES DAMNIT...there are two different standards, didn't you get the memo?"

I'm not a licensed Psychotherapist, so I'm not able to help you or others with voices and or visions going on in their minds and/or the lies they hold onto that gives them comfort. But as promised yesterday..."Jakee" I'm posting the MSNBC Video of the 2008 debate. The birther question comes up around 6:04 min. in the video timeline. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw2eVBMURVU TRUTH...most people can't handle the truth. Off to shoot approaches and a hold or two...back to my self imposed banning.

Politico had a column on the birther conspiracy back in Feb. 2008 as well as the Telegraph Tribune, if my memory is correct. My primary point is the Birther conspiracy started way before Trump entered into the controversy.

I'll link the video of the debate in the morning, working off an Apple computer and not very familiar with the technology at my finger tips...it's like wondering around in the DARK.

Well, there you go again with an elitist attitude... It's elitist to recognise spin from a biased webiste that works for a particular candidate? Man you must really love having the wool pulled over your eyes! So now you have a new claim? Dude, why would the right wing websites be jizzing themselves about a low level, immediately fired, Cinton campaign worker who forwarded a birther email if they had Clinton herself on tape talking about birtherism? http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/us/politics/15demdebate-transcript.html http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/26/us/politics/26text-debate.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 Here are the two MSNBC debates that took place in 2008. In the second one (purely a Clinton/Obama debate) they talk about nothing but healthcare for the first quarter of an hour. In the first one (Clinton/Edwards/Obama) they are asked about race at the beginning but Clinton says nothing derogatory, and absolutely nothing regarding birthplace or citizenship is even hinted at. So what the hell are you talking about? It appears your research skills are very POOR. Damn DUDE, you would think with all the technology available at your finger tips you could find your way in the Dark.

Well, there you go again with an elitist attitude...maybe MSNBC is more to you're liking. Maybe if you go back to a presidental debate between Clinton / Obama in 2008 you will find that is the time within 36 hours of the debate the Birther issue started. Trump jumped on the issue in 2011 three years later. To help you out...during the debate around 6:12 minutes into the debate it comes up.

Not disputing that, but that is different from Hillary or her campaign starting it. I linked it for you...seems all is well when the TRUTH comes out. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/16/hillary-clinton-campaign-manager-admits-birtherism-started/

Which is one of the strongest arguments for legalization. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIIFRBTOb1Y