TrophyHusband

the one on the right or the one on the left. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

thanks for the link. it looks like more than i'm willing to fuck with though. just kidding the bacon things sound great. i think i'll incorporate it into my green bean casserole recipe. http://www.kjandmegan.com/Green-Bean-Casserole.html "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

hey, i read the article, i'm just not going to follow the advice "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

thanks for the link. it looks like more than i'm willing to fuck with though. i think i might give dish a try and if it sucks then i'll just have to go cable. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

we already have a dvr, it's just full without very many shows recorded on it, plus i can only watch hd and whatever i have recorded on one tv. with dish, one dvr unit not only stores more recordings than i need, but one unit works two tv's. with this setup, i can record something and watch it in either the living room or the bedroom. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

you don't need gravy if you make these: http://www.kjandmegan.com/Bailey-s-Creamy-Goodness.html although it doesn't fit into your "healthy" criteria. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

how often and for how long? are we talking just a little while during the worst of the afternoon storms or is it every every time it clouds up on a summer afternoon and evening? i could deal with occasional interference, but i would really be pissed to lose my signal every day. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

we had dish for 4 years, but when we got to florida we got cable. it sucks. my dvr only works on one tv and the rest of the tvs only get channels 2-70 and they are standard def. my dvr has 16 show recorded on it and it is full. i want to go back to dish, but was told that it sucks here because the summer afternoon storm clouds and so thick that you lose signal a lot. looking around, i don't see many satellite dishes on houses at all, so its believable. is this really the case? "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

jelly of the month club "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

why in the world would you be curious about getting christmas off next year for a job that pays less than $9 and hour? it sounds like the people you work for suck too, but on these weekends and holidays you only have to go in for 40 minutes and you're bitching about it? stop with the "poor me can they really get away with this" attitude, or every job you have in life is going to suck. suck it up, don't complain, and do the best you can. in the meantime, put you're efforts into finding a better place to work. even in this economy you can find another job before the next holiday season. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

i'm also in the process of putting my recipes on my website. i almost always have my laptop in the kitchen anyway. here's just one: http://www.kjandmegan.com/Green-Bean-Casserole.html it is a hybrid of an alton brown recipe and the recipe from the can of french fried onion (or is it the cream of mushroom soup? i can't remember.) i made a couple minor changes such as well. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

I have one giant binder I filled with clear sheet protectors and dividers for recipes torn from a magazine, printed from the internet, or hand-written on a piece of paper. I love it, because we only save the ones that we love. Over the years, it has really filled up. Other than that, just Roy's Fish and Seafood.

Somebody loves LSU or the huskies, but i can't see where the huskies fit into a thread about the bcs. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

i let a girl shave my balls once back in the days when it was uncommon for guys or girls to be clean shaven so it was the complete job and not just knocking off a few day's growth. we had to use clippers at first before we could the bean bag them with the razor. somehow a little of my ballskin got caught in the clippers and got cut. it wasn't very deep, but it bled like hell. freaky little chick sucked on the cut intil it stopped bleeding. when it was my turn to groom her, i used the smallest guard there was and ever since then whenever my coin purse curlies get too long to just use a razor, i have that guard on the clippers. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

Absolutely we do... "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

i was just coming back to address this issue. lets forget about whether or not i believe they are guilty. would it be safe to assume that obama and holder have looked at the evidence and they are convinced of guilt? i think they have. if obama believes they are guilty of planning the attack, doesn't he have an obligation to put them in the venue that gives them the highest chances of both a fair trial and a conviction? do you he has done that? "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

This is shocking to hear from anyone who's ever taken an American high school civics course, much less an intelligent, educated person such as yourself. Thousands of criminal trials are held in the US every day, and some of them result in Not Guilty verdicts - not because of "technicalities", or "weak evidence", or "bleeding hearts", etc., but because sometimes people who are accused of wrong-doing really are not guilty. If you don't understand that most core principle of any legitimate system of laws, then there's no point to discussing it any further. If that becomes the acceptable standard, then 2 centuries of US veterans have fought, bled and died for nothing. i don't think its acceptable for a judge or a jury to judge before a trial, but private citizens are certainly entitled to make judgements before someone has been tried in court. if they get called for jury duty, they also have an obligation to say that they've already made up their mind. "innocent before proven guilty" applies to the courts, not private citizens. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

i'm trying to get a better understanding of things here, so my questions to you are simply our of curiosity. if you know the answers off the top of your head, great. if not, i don't expect you to do my homework for me. i thought that military tribunals had always been around. after a quick google search it appears that they were created by the bush administration. is this correct? what about them is unconstitutional? historically, how were people who committed acts of war against our country tried? with a quick google of detainment under the geneva convention i found this: "Article 118 of the Geneva Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Aug. 12, 1949, [1955] 6 U.S. T. 3316, 3406, T. I. A. S. No. 3364 (“Prisoners of war shall be released and repatriated without delay after the cessation of active hostilities”). See also Article 20 of the Hague Convention (II) on Laws and Customs of War on Land, July 29, 1899, 32 Stat. 1817 (as soon as possible after “conclusion of peace”); Hague Convention (IV), supra, Oct. 18, 1907, 36 Stat. 2301(“conclusion of peace” (Art. 20)); Geneva Convention, supra, July 27, 1929, 47 Stat. 2055 (repatriation should be accomplished with the least possible delay after conclusion of peace (Art. 75)); Praust, Judicial Power to Determine the Status and Rights of Persons Detained without Trial, 44 Harv. Int’l L. J. 503, 510—511 (2003) (prisoners of war “can be detained during an armed conflict, but the detaining country must release and repatriate them ‘without delay after the cessation of active hostilities,’ unless they are being lawfully prosecuted or have been lawfully convicted of crimes and are serving sentences” (citing Arts. 118, 85, 99, 119, 129, Geneva Convention (III), 6 T. I .A. S., at 3384, 3392, 3406, 3418))." clearly we can keep these guys as long as there are hostilities*, but i think we are all on the same page in wanting the hostilities to end long before these guys die. that being the case, they have to be tried and convicted in order to ensure they never go free. is criminal court the only way we can do this? are there other world courts that re an option. *we can argue endlessly over what constitutes "hostilities", but do we really need to get into that? probably not. finally, how do you try someone when some of the evidence or methods for collecting the evidence are classified? does the decision have to be made to either declassify it or just not present it, or are there other options? "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

If they get off "using" our system, meaning if they get off due to us not using our system, right? The error is not the defendant's, it's ours. but where is the error? i think the error would be in deciding to try them in criminal court. when they were detained and the evidence was collected, the thought didn't even cross their minds that this should be treated as a criminal case and everything should be handled as such. there was no reason to think that. you and i might disagree where the error occurred, but we do agree that the error is ours. this doesn't mean that these guys should ever walk free. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

That attitude prevails by conservatives thinking their guy was perfect and they can't understand all the hooplah. Anything Obama does to rectify America's acts to the world are appreciated by the world, considered slanderous to conservative Americans. The world has put the Bush Admin on trial over the last decade, cleaning up yet anothe rof his messes is just that, nothing hidden. this is not the proper avenue to take reguarding bush or the views of the rest of the world. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

Can you read or do you not want to see... I asked you if they were proven to be innocent due to overwhealming evidence that somebody else did it (wink wink, think NEOCON adgenda!), would you still want them killed? Have you chosen the Judgment before the trial? is that what you believe in? they say they did it but where is the real evidence? sorry, i didn't read your post correctly, my bad. if there's overwhelming evidence that they are innocent, then of course i don't want them to be found guilty. i just don't believe that to be the case. so yes, i have chosen judgement before the trial. as far as your scenario, the "NEOCON agenda" thing is just rediculous conspiracy theory bullshit. is it possible that these guys said "hey, let's claim reponsibility for this so we can become martyrs when the us executes us"? i suppose, be i doubt it. i can't answer the question of where the real evidence is, but i believe there is some. the reason is that obama must believe there's real evidence. otherwise he wouldn't have holder virtually guarenteeing a conviction. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

i do not want the people who committed an act of war against our country to walk. call it what you want. justice, revenge, national security interest, whatever. these guys did it. we know they did it. even if they get off using our legal system, they are still guilty. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

this has trouble written all over it. first of all, i think the intention here is to put the bush administration on trial. many on the left want to see this, but it is being done at the risk of either letting these guys walk or making a mockery of our legal system. if we are going to put them through our legal justice system, we have to follow the law. this means that if the the charges should be dropped, then we have to drop the charges. the rules for what evidence is allowed must be followed, etc. they also need to have an impartial jury. they need to get a fair trial. this is where you can shed some light on this andy. how do they get a fair trial? how do they find an impartial jury? if a judge should throw this case out for whatever reason, how does he do that? if he doesn't do what he's legally obligated to do, the whole trial becomes a farce. if he does throw it out, his life is in immediate danger. i just hope that there is enough legally* obtained evidence to convict these guys. *reguardless of whether or not it was "legal" at the time, i highly doubt any information gathered under "inhanced interigation techniques" will be allowed. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

i got it when i had some lypomas removed too, but that time it was without versed. it was right before the last election and they wrote political stuff about the candidate i was against on my back and ass. they gave me too much that time though. joe (my anestetist) was trying to talk to me on the way back to the or and i knew it, but there was no way i could even respond. i was just a puddle enjoying the view-sound-feel. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com

try to find your own personal anesthetist. one of the crna's at our last duty station was a good friend of mine. we did a lot of drinking together. he wwas the coolest morman i ever met (it was funny when the missionaries showed up at his house once on poker night). anyway, one of the surgeons who was stationed there took a fetus in fetu out of my arm once with only a local and told him that i was a huge vagina and sweated and cried the whole time so he gave me ketamine. find a crna that will give you ketamine. oh, and they dipped my balls in some sort of blue dye and wrote shit on my thighs with sharpie and took cell phone pics and sent them to my wife. "Your scrotum is quite nice" - Skymama www.kjandmegan.com