jakee
-
Content
24,924 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74 -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by jakee
-
Tit for tat would imply there are equal misdeeds going in both directions. There are not. Donald Trump has wrought much evil, both at a personal level and to the country as a whole. Obama and Biden haven't. Yes, it's so unreasonable of liberals not to simply believe you when you say Biden and Obama are evil without any examples or evidence. Clearly, this is their problem and not yours.
-
People on here aren’t senior party officials making speeches to kids. Hell, if a Democrat said that at a school event in Florida DeSantis would have a bill banning it ready to go tomorrow.
-
Which is absolutely not a good thing. However, if/when the war is won Ukraine is already facing a staggeringly massive cleanup of Russian minefields, booby traps and unexploded munitions. The Khakovka dam sabotage alone has swept tens of thousands of Russian mines from somewhat known and bounded minefields to absolutely anywhere across half of southern Ukraine. While it’s never going to be good to add to that, the cost/benefit analysis of what weapons Ukraine uses against invading forces on their own soil is theirs to make, and not automatically a war crime.
-
Tell me which bit of the rest of my post you didn’t understand and I’ll gladly explain it to you.
-
Remember when the House Oversight Committee said they had a whistleblower ready to talk about Biden’s illicit Chinese money, but went missing? Turns out he went missing because he was arrested then skipped bail for being an unregistered foreign agent for China who tried to convince a Trump campaign official to publicly support certain Chinese policies. Oh, and an unauthorised conflict zone arms dealer and Iranian oil smuggler, but who’s counting? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-66160979
-
What the right wing media (and Russia friendly/conspiracy theorist media) is missing is that she said ‘potentially’ a war crime. Any conversation about Russian use of cluster bombs is clearly in the context of them indiscriminately targeting civilian, urban, residential, populated areas with them. That is what makes it a war crime. Using them against legitimate military targets (despite almost the entire rest of the world banning them) is not.
-
The whole point he’s trying to make is quite odd. Ask any archaeologist if they’re more interested in a) finding out how the people they dig up lived their lives or b) counting male and female skeletons, and what do we think they’re going to say?
-
.
-
The God business is good business!
-
Where does what stop? A handful of people saying silly things? That never stops. So….? By the way, here is an actual Twitter quote the author of your article chose to repost in support of his point: “It took 43 presidents to make us stand tall and 1 black guy to unravel it all.” Where does that kind of blatant racism stop???
-
If all you care about is the scoreboard, why do you keep lying about how the points were scored? Why does the truth scare you so much?
-
Well, this is fun… Russia has planted suspected explosives on Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant roofs, says Zelenskiy Ukraine has been increasingly warning that Russia is planning to blow up parts of the Zaporizhzhia plant, and have been evacuating most remaining workers. It now seems like they’re making physical preparations for a false flag attack to make it look like Ukrainian shelling. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/05/russia-has-planted-suspected-explosives-on-zaporizhzhia-nuclear-plant-roofs-says-zelenskiy
-
I was talking about the first European settlers in the 1600s
-
Not the first settlers. That’s not true.
-
But it also happens to be corrupt.
-
You remember that we've already covered how that article doesn't support your statement at all? That despite your feelings about Harry Reid, he did not make it possible for the Republicans to force through their SC Justice nominees? That the fact is the Republicans changed the rules? You remember any of that at all, or are you too busy being butt hurt about whatever it is republican snowflakes are supposed to be scared of today?
-
Are you still insisting that the current Supreme Court makeup was made possible by Harry Reid because it feels right to you? Are you also not a supporter of the laws in Texas, Florida and elsewhere that forbid teaching accurate race relations history because some butt hurt white students might get their precious feelings hurt?
-
Where he had obviously been promoted previously, despite being the same person he was when he worked with you. How is that possible?
-
There’s an easy thing for you to do here - say how you know the black woman was promoted for affirmative action reasons. Without that the only rational conclusion is that you’re just assuming.
-
Is Harvard the only school that operates that way? Obviously not. How many schools need to have white privilege baked into their admissions system before you concede that the university system as a whole has a problem with white privilege? After all, you can keep looking at every individual school and say 'meritorious black candidates can just go somewhere else' but when you examine them all together there comes a point you can't squeeze all the meritorious candidates into the number of schools which admit on merit.
-
Interesting thought, Airdvr. Hey Airdvr, would you like to offer a counter? Riiiiight.
-
If winning is all you care about, why do you feel the need to lie about how it was done?
-
Why do you think it benefits you to pretend to be that obtuse? It is crystal clear that Joe is calling him a hypocrite. The two words may start with the same letter but they sure as hell don’t mean the same thing.
-
Those are the depths you have to sink to to support your argument here? “The Democrats did it first, 60 years ago”? And you seriously think that helps your cause?
-
I shouldn’t have said the whole of his Presidency, that was wrong. Shit - you see how easy that was? Why don’t you try it? But your conclusion is, once again, utterly absurd. Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland may be the most prominent casualty of the GOP-controlled Senate’s election-year resistance on the federal judiciary — but the pace of overall judicial confirmations under Mitch McConnell is on track to become the slowest in more than 60 years. https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/mitch-mcconnell-judges-225455
