jakee

Members
  • Content

    24,960
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by jakee

  1. I'm sorry, they have to prove the driver did something intentional to show he was negligent? I think you need to double check what negligence means... Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  2. But by the same logic (and yes, I know, Godwin) he could argue that Germany should fly Swastikas over their War memorials and the Reichstag because their country called upon those men to go to war. And they did. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  3. Only the Mad Hatter would think that was an answer. But hey, that is your style. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  4. I know you do. That way you can dismiss anyone who disagrees with you without needing to think about their position. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  5. You've used the Romans quote many times. Whenever I've asked you what that means for people resisting against tyrannical governments you've never answered, you've only dodged. Feel free to put the record straight though - who was obeying God's authority under the Quisling and Vichy governments, collaborators or resistance fighters? If you choose not to though, your position is clear. There is plenty of information to show that resisting tyrannical governments is not in contradiction to the statements made in Romans. http://www.worldmag.com/2014/08/was_the_american_revolution_sinful The end point of that guy's article (which mostly consists of him making stuff up, by the way) is that the passage doesn't mean anything. Governments are God given, unless they're not and you should follow them, unless you shouldn't. So why bring it up at all? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  6. Only if you keep trying to dodge a simple question. Who was acting in accordance with God's law, collaborators or resistance? I'll point out that when it comes to US forces carrying out questionable orders you have absolutely no problem reading Romans in black and white. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  7. You've used the Romans quote many times. Whenever I've asked you what that means for people resisting against tyrannical governments you've never answered, you've only dodged. Feel free to put the record straight though - who was obeying God's authority under the Quisling and Vichy governments, collaborators or resistance fighters? If you choose not to though, your position is clear. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  8. It doesn't, and you know it doesn't. It does come from people who call university researchers and professors 'ivory tower intellectuals' who aren't in touch like Joe the Plumber is - as if they somehow don't live in the real world like everyone else. As if they somehow don't have to deal with mortgage payments, car loans, health insurance and school districts just like everyone else. As if the job of creating and conveying knowledge in their chosen field leaves no room left in their brains for understanding everyday life the way a good ol' blue collar working guy, or business owner, or CEO, or really anyone but an academic or liberal politician does. It's a prejudice that has real consequences. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  9. Yeah, Ron's quite fond of that one too. But he goes strangely quiet when you point out that it means, for instance, that Quislings and Vichy French were good Christians and resistance fighters were rebels against God. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  10. He may well be mentally ill. But premeditated murder alone doesn't prove that. Not by a long shot. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  11. Absolutely not. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  12. Yeah. Racism is a constant throughout human history. So how does recognising it constitute 'playing the race card' and how does ignoring it constitute seeing things clearly? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  13. What are gun grabbers, and why would they want to defend her? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  14. No, not as if you had the power singularly unify America. Why would I have meant that? It's a pretty childish way of reading my post. Thing is, unity vs division is a big theme of yours and last time I asked you what you would be willing to do to help bring about unity your answer was to vote for the most right wing candidates on the ballot. And I gotta tell ya that isn't going to help. So I was just wondering if you'd found a more grown up way of contributing to the solution since then. Guess not. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  15. How? In what way are your dealings with your countrymen helping to foster unity? How have you changed since the last time you didn't have any answer for that question? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  16. No, you're not interested in compromise, but you keep whining and bleating about how there's no unity. Which makes it seem like you're calling yourself a troll? At least that's honest for a change. So, if you're not willing to compromise in the name of unity, what is your plan? How are you going to help make it happen? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  17. Yeah that's what you asked, but it's not what either of them said. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  18. That's not important, is it? I have no role in uniting your country, and I'm not continuously lamenting it's discord. You are though. You call for unity, but you're not willing to compromise on anything in the name of unity, and you mock the people who aren't united with you instead of trying to persuade them of your cause. So tell me, where is unity going to come from? What is it that you are doing to try and foster unity? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  19. What do the people who aren't with you object to? you aren't willing to make one iota of compromise, you're more interested in belittling than convincing those you see as your oponents - where is it that you hope this unity will come from? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  20. For people like you to stop being so selfish? You talk and talk about unity but then you refuse point blank to compromise any tiny part of your own position. What makes you think there's a hope in hell of the whole country uniting behind you ideals? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  21. Yes. Fantasy. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  22. Do either the fat white cunt or the Oreo post here? I certainly hadn't noticed them. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  23. Oh, I agree. As long as it's nothing that wouldn't happen on a football field I don't see how the guy can possibly complain. Said no form of logic. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  24. Yeah, the thread shows exactly what happened. You used a grossly inaccurate number to try and support your argument and kept inisting it was correct despite clearly being shown otherwise by your own sources. It's just fascinating that you're unable to admit a clear mistake. Heck, you just tried to explain that your average figure was correct because you took the lowest number and added $5k to it. Even if you dropped maths before high school you must know that's not how you get an average number, so why keep arguing it is? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
  25. Hey, I've just remembered why this is so familiar. Thee was that time you claimed Obama enabled Ebola with an executive order opening the borders and it was total bollocks. You then spent several pages claiming you were right all along because Obama once said something completely different that vaguely related to borders. You seem to have a real problem understanding that when you say something it really does mean what you said. So another piece of advice - if you don't want to be held to the specifics of the things you say, don't be fucking specific. Because if you do and it's wrong, it's your fault. It's not the fault of the people reading it and taking your words at face value, it's not our job to be your mind readers. Do you want to have an ideagasm?